On January 10, at a hearing between Djokovic and the Australian Border Agency, the court ruled in favor of Djokovic on the grounds that the Australian Border Agency had not complied with the time agreement.
Just as Djokovic's family and fans were celebrating the victory and Djokovic was returning to training on the pitch, local media broke the news that the Australian government was investigating whether Djokovic's entry materials were fake.
Indeed, this farce is like a suspense blockbuster, reversing and reversing and reversing. Just after the dust has fallen, leaving a suspicious fragment, which is extremely frightening.
Question 1: 14 days before arriving in Australia, did Djokovic travel to other places?
In the entry information form, Djokovic clearly fills in: he has not traveled anywhere in the 14 days before entering the country.
But from the information of the social platform, he was in Belgrade, Serbia, on December 25, in Spain on January 2, and in Dubai on January 4.
Many fans may argue that what others have written, written purely clerical errors, etc., and feel that it is a trivial matter. But don't forget, clearly state in the entry information form: "Filling in incorrect or misleading information is a serious crime and may be subject to civil penalties." The maximum penalty for such violations can be up to one year.
Therefore, if the Australian government really investigates this matter, this farce is likely to be reversed.
Doubt 2: On December 16, did Deyo have a second infection with the new crown?
After winning the case, Deyo's mother declared: "This is the most important victory of Deyo's career, more important than any grand slam!" ”
On the evening of January 10, when Deyo's family held a press conference, the third brother was asked whether Deyo was infected with the new crown on December 16, and he replied: "The whole process is public and legal. But then when asked why he was still attending public events after being infected with the new crown, the third brother directly called off the press conference.
First of all, on December 16, djokovic did not disclose the news publicly, which is understandable. But what is incomprehensible is that on December 17 and December 18, they participated in public events without wearing masks, and one of them was a teenager.
On a moral level, this is not something Djokovic can do.
But if there is no infection, then who is lying?