laitimes

Ryzen™ 6000 performance doubling suspected cheat AMD: Optimized well

At the just held CES 2022 exhibition, AMD released a new generation of Ryzen™ 6000 series standard voltage and low-power processors, corresponding to the 6000H and 6000U series, the new generation of Ryzen™ 6000 mobile processors using a 6nm process, the architecture upgrade to Zen 3+, which makes its energy efficiency has been comprehensively improved.

Ryzen™ 6000 performance doubling suspected cheat AMD: Optimized well

According to amD's official PPT, the 6000U series for thin and light notebooks has improved significantly, such as the Ryzen 7 6800U compared to the Ryzen 7 5800U, the performance is increased by 70%-130%, and the maximum improvement is doubled.

However, for the data given on the official PPT, many netizens found that AMD is catty in the test, because the test results are the results under different TDP, such as the Ryzen 7 5800U is 15W TDP, and the Ryzen 7 6800U is 28W TDP, and the final performance output of different TDP for mobile-grade processors is completely different. Comparing the 15W processor with the 28W processor, the performance double is not a strange thing, which makes netizens feel that AMD is cheating and deceiving users.

However, in response, AMD official response is, "we can not strip this comparison from the context, AMD has done a lot of work on the Ryzen 6000 processor, of which the CPU core alone has more than 50 optimizations, so the processor TDP can be increased to 28W, while not affecting the temperature, noise and other parameters of the system, which is one of the main advances of the new processor." ”

That is to say, comparing the results with different TDP tests, AMD does not think that this is cheating, but the results of the optimization of the Ryzen 6000 series in many aspects. The redesigned Ryzen™ 6000 series processors can make fuller use of the increased TDP for energy efficiency optimization, which is actually an advance in AMD.

I don't know what everyone thinks about this? Feel free to leave a comment in the comments section below.

(7847834)

Read on