First of all, to say something that seems to be irrelevant but is actually related, those who are arrogant and domineering but "lazy" to come up with evidence, please automatically skip my article. If you want to argue, you can come up with evidence, and don't blurt out words like "frog at the bottom of the well" without moving.
Times have changed, and the days when the West could question Chinese history and China could not question Western history have long since passed.
In addition, a small reminder to Western advocates (referred to as "Western blowers" in this article) my first girlfriend was Russian (although I can only say that she was young and ignorant at the time), and later I had a French girlfriend
When I took the screenshot, I found that I had typed a lot of French wrong
So if you feel like you have more "international outlook" than I do, I'm too lazy to refute it.
Okay, let's get down to business.
Alexander the Great was undoubtedly one of the greatest emperors in Western history, perhaps juxtaposed with only the Roman Empire. I don't want to discuss whether Alexander really exists, just through the Network of various West blowing articles, to show you the violations.
First of all, let's take a look at this account, with this string of titles and 870,000 followers, I believe that no one can say that she has insufficient IQ, right?
This is the evaluation of Alexander the Great by this Xi chui, "shocking the ancient and modern" and "far better than Xiang Yu".
Alexander the Great's achievements are actually not much troublesome, because a little bit of historical common sense knows that what unified Greece, what defeated Persia, what hit India, and even some people put out bold words, fortunately Alexander was lost, otherwise China would also speak Greek.
This is an excerpt from the article of this Nishibuki reporter. Notice the time of Alexander's birth,
And this is the data that is publicly available on the Internet. That is to say, when this Xibu reporter was bragging, he actually couldn't wait to blow it without even understanding it. So in a hurry?
Noticing this figure, the Nishibuki reporter believes that Alexander's army had 20,000 infantry and 5,000 cavalry.
This is the data I found in another Nishibuki article. Interestingly, most articles on the Internet believe that the number of infantry should be thirty thousand. Excuse me, before you advocate, can you first unify the data? Even if I want to believe, who should I believe?
If you have read my article yesterday about Herodotus's History, you will know that according to the History, the Persian army was as high as 5.3 million at the time of the Persian War, and one million left after a hundred years? And this is still a local battle, oh, the army should be more.
During the Greek-Persian War, the Greeks could kill thousands in three hundred, and Alexander naturally could not be too weak, defeating one million with thirty thousand!
I believe that XiFuri will definitely say that in ancient China, there were also many examples of battles in which the weak won the strong!
Yes, yes, China also has many examples of the weak winning the strong. For example, the Battle of Guandu, the Battle of Chibi, the Battle of Shuishui and even the Battle of Salhu are among the classics. However, it should be noted that all of China's examples of defeating the strong with the weak have occurred under the premise of favorable times, places, and people, and they have all won by means of strategy, not face-to-head confrontation.
Alexander, on the other hand, was in a Macedonian phalanx frontal to harden Persia! Well, so to speak, the Pressure Mountain Emperor is really a god and a man.
But a little bit of detail, and always feel that something is wrong. Regardless of the time, in terms of geography, Alexander is the attacking party, Persia is the defensive side, and on the people, some people say that Persia is a backward slave country. I can only hehe. Persia is a slave country, isn't Macedonia? Isn't it ridiculous to take this to prove that Alexander deserves to win?
And many people have not noticed that, strictly speaking, Macedonia is not Greek! Neither Athens nor Sparta, the two leaders of Greece, recognized Macedonia as Greek! In fact, to this day, Macedonia is only partly in Greece. That is to say, for the "democratic" Greeks, there was no difference between Persia and Macedonia!
That is to say, the time and place are favorable, and the people are not on Alexander's side, so why should he win? The only explanation is that Persia was too weak.
Let's look back at the most bizarre account of Alexander the Great. Alexander's Kingdom of Macedonia actually had only 30,000 or 40,000 troops, and the Greek city-states that had defeated 5.3 million persian troops had at least hundreds of thousands of armies according to Herodotus.
Notice that the climax is coming, how many armies did Alexander have after he conquered Greece? A, more than thirty thousand. How many armies did Alexander have after defeating Persia, more than thirty thousand! How many troops did Alexander have left after he hit India? More than 30,000!
That is to say, Alexander conquered thousands of miles, and the army had almost no losses!
We all know that the important reason for Cao Cao's defeat in the Battle of Chibi was the disobedience of the water and soil, and we could not imagine that our Alexander the Great was indeed the son of God, and the army did not lose anything because of this problem!
As for what would happen to Alexander if he came to China, I did not answer. However, I found on the Internet the number of armies of various countries during the Warring States period. Pick a few weak chickens to give you examples.
Even if the Song Kingdom did not enter the army, there were 150,000. Note that this is not the kind of slave of the conquered peoples who have been forcibly integrated in Persia, but a legitimate "national" army.
Faced with such a number, how do you let Alexander play? By blowing?