How the act of the vertical middle finger is replaced by the growth of the middle finger

Squinting has fermented until now, and the original condemned object has unconsciously occupied the moral high ground, while the originally insulted group is standing at the low point of morality.

How did things come to this? Looking back, it was clear that everything was normal and correct, but starting with this woman's video, things went in a strange direction.

The humiliated take the initiative, while the victims pale around arguing that we don't discriminate in appearance.

Is this familiar? If you can't figure it out, then the accusations against the victim in a rape case won't remind you of something.

In this video, the protagonist portrays himself as a poor and innocent worker. Even if the black material is pulled out later, it will not change the impact of this video on the direction of the whole thing.

So what did she do so that things became a separate thing, and it didn't matter if it all worked out, it was a completely different thing?

The first point: I just look like this.

This is one of the cores of the whole text, she uses a me-like look, to replace the whole event from a deliberate act of the day after tomorrow to a natural force majeure factor; to completely strip away her own subjective will; to directly transform her active behavior into a passive behavior that has nothing to do with her own will, and first cut herself off from the abuser.

This is the first step in defending oneself for innocence, which is colloquially speaking, it is to throw the pot.

Often used to say to rapists when defending themselves, "She seduced me"; domestic offenders defend themselves with "it's all his fault"

Wait a minute.

And this kind of retreat is also often used in the first step of PUA, do you think some people have begun to think that this will become an attack on appearance?

The second point: growing up like this is not worthy of Chinese?

This sentence directly changes the nature of the whole event. Directly replaces people's targets.

Is it not worthy to be Chinese when you grow up like this? The paradox of this sentence is the question of whether there is a correlation between looks and nationality.

However, China's laws, humanities, and ethics have not set appearance as a necessary condition for obtaining nationality, and it is the United States that sets these as necessary conditions. So this is a question sentence with a clear answer, and no one will answer yes.

But is the controversy over this matter the relationship between looks and nationality? No, the key point of contention is whether looks represent Chinese.

Isn't her behavior "To look like this is not worthy of being a Chinese?" It's "I'll just use this look to represent Chinese."

This woman replaces the word "represent" with "do," not only putting herself on a moral high ground, but also replacing the fundamental position of our anger.

The reason for all the anger of being discriminated against changed from "we were inexplicably represented by this ugly person" to "discrimination against small eyes"

So we become a bunch of unreasonable troublemakers with facial discrimination, and then we start to jump out and try to mix up the problem in various ways, and then turn the non-existent thing of "the representative of the Chinese looks like this" and "this is the aesthetic of the Chinese" into an established fact, and they try to tell the lie 100 times and then make it a reality.

Except for those big vs who seem to be blackening themselves and seem to want to end this matter, I have not seen a public opinion that equates small eyes with insults.

Third point: complicity

It was the most important thing she had twisted, though she only mentioned it slightly. But if a sentence that I am just a part-time worker can make her withdraw from the whole body, then those who say in court, "I don't know, I just helped him bring a cargo" and "it's not what I mean, the leader let me do it" will not be sentenced.

Their sentence is enough to show that "I am just a hit worker" is not enough to cut her off from the mastermind behind her. From the moment they signed the labor contract, they were in the same group. Judging from the black material that was pulled out of the back, she was probably not only aware of it, but also one of the pushers.

This woman so lightly said her behavior of "I will use my appearance to represent Chinese" as "growing up like this can not be done Chinese? ”

You see all the factors are the same, everything is normal, but the whole thing is replaced with a completely unrelated thing.

Some people who still have rubbing heat and ill-intentions are still shouting "Are the little eyes not worthy to be Chinese?" ”

When you encounter this kind of goods, don't argue with him, and directly retort: "What? Does a small eye represent the whole Chinese? "Three squirrel models on the line."