It has been two years since the finale of "Your Turn", and the official has launched a special chapter and theatrical version again.
How popular was this show back then? It is no exaggeration to say that almost everywhere there is a discussion, and the big boss touches the heart of every audience.
However, the closer to the ending, the more the reputation declines, until the big boss is revealed, and the bad reviews are even more overwhelming. For a time, the web page about "Your Turn" was filled with the word "rotten tail".
Today's audience is not casually perfunctory!
But the strange thing is that the audience that had a vibrant word and showed that they had a feud with the play and the screenwriter once again gathered in the comment area of the special article.
As a "brain-burning" drama, the audience must not lack of smart people, otherwise they can't even keep up with the plot. But after seeing the comment area of the special article, I didn't know what "outrageous" was.
Because no one translates the introduction into Chinese, so that the audience skips the introduction directly, and after watching it, the conclusion is summed up as - what is this all about?
Compared with the special parts of other dramas in the past, this special part is indeed not excellent, but it should be said clearly, this is the parallel world of the drama version of "Your Turn", and it is the beginning of the theater version, otherwise why are the people who were killed in the play alive here, so how can the plot that obviously contradicts the drama version come to "repeat it"?
Although the theatrical version and the special part are released on the same day, the theater version can only be seen in Japan, whether it is good or bad is still too early to say, and it is too much to give a bad review without reading it.
Regarding the "bad tail", in fact, it is more than this drama. In recent years, I can always see netizens discussing which work is bad from time to time, and some people are justified in saying it, but I suspect that most of the audience is actually just following the trend.
Sometimes I really want to ask them, have you really seen it? Is there really a serious look? Do you really understand? How many times fast to see?
Regardless of whether the work is "rotten", the film and television works in recent years are full of novel adaptations, and completely original scripts are very few, and sometimes even adaptations will overturn.
What is adaptation is to make reasonable arrangements on the basis of a work, fill in loopholes, and try to be as close to perfection as possible, rather than randomly adding settings and adding loopholes on the basis of loopholes!
Maybe I haven't seen enough works, and I've never seen a work that is completely flawless. Compared with the "screenwriters" who will only adapt, I appreciate those screenwriters who dare to create, without trying which will have good works, how to learn from experience without failure?
For some reason, many film and television dramas we can not watch from the formal channels, to put it bluntly, most of the audience is actually "eating white food", but it is such an audience, but it is good to accuse this accusation every day, but few people have thought, no one has ever told you to watch!
Some dramas will be broadcast in several seasons, it is normal for the quality to decline, and it is very common for the audience to abandon the drama in the middle, but even if the drama is abandoned, every season, people have to step on it once, this behavior as a normal person is really understanding incompetent...
Sometimes, many viewers don't really care about what the work is meant to express, let alone the quality, and the reason they are forced to watch it is simple - because everyone around them is watching.
Yes, "because everyone around you is watching", if you don't look, when others discuss, you can only smirk on the side and can't participate. What does it matter? But it cannot be denied that this kind of thing that only a child cares about will also bother an adult.
The funniest thing I've ever heard is that a person who hasn't seen a Marvel movie said that he was moved to cry when he watched Avengers 4. Almost no character is known, can you really understand the story and the motivation of the character's behavior? I don't know, I just think it's ridiculous.
The quality of the work is indeed a good point of discussion, but many times, because an actor is not good, it is not his favorite, to sentence a work to death, is it really good?
In addition to talking about "rotten tails", the most complained about was the acting skills of Nishino Nanase, the actor of Kuroshima.
Does her acting skills suck? It's not really good, but it's not so bad. In a country that can tolerate "zero acting" star practitioners, this is unbearable?
Good works are indispensable, but qualified audiences are also indispensable. Discussion is OK, but at least to a degree.