Man is made by Nüwa and Fuxi, man is changed by monkeys, man enters the earth from outside the earth, man is a plant evolution, etc. There are actually too many claims about the emergence of human beings. However, most are "hypotheses" or "theories" or "theories." There is no definitive account of how this man came to be. In recent years, although scientists have been "tracing" the origin of human beings, there is no "specific" conclusion.
Therefore, many people are "controversial" in the two directions of ape evolution and extraterrestrial civilization. The theory of ape evolution is equivalent to having the support of "Darwinian evolution". The claim of extraterrestrial civilization is that human beings have not discovered anything for the time being, so to say that the product of extraterrestrial civilization is also a "hypothetical" explanation, and we will analyze it below.
Could humanity be a product of extraterrestrial civilizations?
First of all, we can make it clear that extraterrestrial civilizations have not yet been found, including the possibility of extraterrestrial civilizations on celestial bodies such as Mars. But when humans use probes to explore, we don't seem to have found anything. At best, it means that there is water under Mars. Indeed, as long as there is water, it means that there is a great possibility of life. However, this is only a preliminary judgment and is not supported by practical evidence.
Therefore, whether Mars has life or not is also a speculative statement. The only problem that can be pointed out that humans may be the product of extraterrestrial life is that some scientists believe that there are space rocks that may carry chemicals into the earth, and then life forms appear on the earth. Is it possible, it is indeed so possible. But the most critical point is in "extraterrestrial life".
If we do not find "extraterrestrial life" and everything is "speculative", then there is no way to explain the problem of the relationship between human beings and the products of extraterrestrial civilization. Science is about empirical evidence, not speculative claims. So will humanity be a product of extraterrestrial civilization? At least in modern science, this problem cannot be proved. Unless some evidence can be found in the future, it will always be a "dead proposition".
That man evolved from an ape?
Judging from the scientific exploration, the proponents of "Darwin's theory of evolution" are the majority. Humans are believed to be the product of biological evolution, and that humans share a common ancestor with modern apes. According to the fossil material of ancient apes and ancient humans that have been discovered, the earliest humans may have appeared 3 million or 4 million years ago. In this theory, the origin of human beings is roughly divided into three stages, the ancient ape stage, the human and ape stage, and the stage of people who can make tools.
Humans are certainly in this last stage, and the earliest genus of humans emerged from the end of the transition from ape to man. So from this theoretical basis, we are apes. This is also measured according to Darwin's theory of biological evolution. At least, from the existing exploration situation, this is how it evolved. Moreover, scientists have also found that modern humans are still evolving and have not stopped.
In 2020, the news that humans are still evolving is causing a sensation. Scientists have found an increase since the late 19th century when an artery remains in the forearm, which usually disappears about 8 weeks after birth in humans. Around the 1880s, this occurred at 10 percent; however, in the 20th century, the incidence rose to 30 percent. Therefore, from the actual observation data, human evolution has not stopped.
This seems to have "hit" the evolutionary theory again. Therefore, most people support "Darwinian evolution", and many scientists also believe that it has obvious accuracy. However, the theory is still theory, and there is no specific evidence to prove that his theory is completely correct. So here too, I will refer to it. However, it is emphasized here that the existing universal understanding in the scientific community is that "human beings evolved".
Was the first man on earth a man or a woman?
If we look at it according to the theory of evolution, the emergence of human beings may not be one by one. It may have been a co-evolution of a "large group" in which humans could reproduce. Therefore, there are men and women, if there is a single group, a single man or woman, there may be no chance of continuation. Therefore, men and women may appear together. However, the answer to whether the first true male or female is still "unknown" is still "unknown".
The scientific community has not explained it, but as long as the question of human origin is found, it is possible to find the answer. Just as we said that there is a chicken and an egg problem, the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has released a research result specifically to explain.
Researcher Yin Zongjun believes that if the animal is likened to a chicken, the complex embryonic development process is to hatch the eggs of the chick, which bridges the gap between the animal's single-cell ancestor and the animal's multicellular ancestor. The discovery of the fossilized pitcher ball just shows that the "egg" that hatched the animal 'chicken' appeared 610 million years ago.
So, according to evolution, if we find the most "initial" apes, we may find whether males or females appear first, which is the general situation.