Recently, the dispute between the famous car critic No. 38 and the Citroën employee elephant can be described as intensifying, and many melon-eating masses are also relishing it, so the author will take you back to the past.
First of all, it was the No. 38 car review on November 8 on the platform to understand the car emperor released a video of the evaluation of Versailles C5 X, after many car critics have been a compliment to Versailles, and No. 38 has done the opposite, attacked it, there are some subjective judgments in the video content, and some problems have caused some netizens to criticize. (For details, you can go to see the original video)
In particular, it attracted the attention of Citroën employee elephants, so it also updated a series of frequencies in the understanding of chedi, and the video content was in the official activities of Citroën, together with several car review engineers, several questions about the 38th evaluation of Versailles were judged, which caused a lot of heat.
Then released a second video, from the owner's point of view to evaluate Versailles, the video content directly attacked the No. 38 double standard problem, the heat continued to rise.
As soon as these two videos were released, they caused a lot of fierce discussion among car friends. Go to the original post to comment, output personal opinions, of course, there may be a water army.
However, the elephant was after all an unknown small self-media person before, and it would be uncomfortable to shake the tree, which also suffered from a wave of 38 fans or the output of the keyboard man standing on the opposite side, but there were also many car owners who stood on the side of the elephant, after all, there were many French car owners. Therefore, the third video was released, and the video content is mainly that the elephant hopes to make a big thing small, a small thing, and not to cause controversy.
But The 38th could not hold back, and it was also the next line. Decided to respond positively to this matter. So a video response was posted on a certain station.
The video content is also subjective output, saying that it is responsible for its own conclusions. Elephants were invited to Beijing for a standoff, so much so that many Fans No. 38 said bluntly in the Elephant Comments Section: "If you have the ability, you will go to Beijing, and if you don't go, you will instigate" statements.
Then 10 questions were answered, positively responding to the points of contention in this farce.
As soon as this video was sent out, the emperor who understood the car was beaten in the face, the law blow of the glass heart, the law black of the villain's victory, and even some of the day blows that came down, chaotic into a pot of porridge.
As a result, the elephant continued to use this wave of heat to publish videos and refuse to rub the title of the traffic. Reminiscent of the response video released on the 38th.
On November 20, Elephant continued to release a video with content also in the Versailles review of connotation 38.
On November 25, before the 38th, the video mentioned that he wanted to buy a Versailles, which was also true. A Versailles C5X was mentioned. Respond with real action to the attacks of these keyboard men.
And since November 28, he has been shouting at the elephants, hoping that they can come to Beijing to face 38 himself on versailles.
The elephant side only responded to the video after a wave of heat fermentation on November 29.
During this period, the elephant has not responded positively, but only replied to private messages from fans. Saying that the work was too busy and there was no time, and after sending a small video on the front of the 38th, the elephant claimed to be the itinerary code belt *, normal later Beijing.
Possibly under the constant pressure of the 38th, the elephant responded positively on December 9, taking the staff as a base point, hoping to resolve the incident, and it can be understood that it admitted, but the video content was difficult to say, and there was no positive response to the previous actions.
Coincidentally, on the day of the 38th, it directly attacked Versailles for having an accelerated jitter problem. And released a long video on the 10th to raise the heat of the problem to another level, the spearhead pointed directly at the company behind Versailles. The long video content is mainly in response to the elephant confession video, word by word dissecting the logical loopholes of the elephant's speech.
At present, the elephant has not responded positively to this matter after the recognition video.
The 38th is for the Versailles accelerated jitter problem, go to the 4S shop for inspection, maintenance, and even ask the manufacturer engineer to further check. I hope to solve my problem as a Vermeer racing owner and reasonably protect my rights and interests from an official point of view.
At the same time, the No. 38 car review updated a period of Versailles versus Star Yue L evaluation, but also in a positive response to some comments that Versailles should benchmark SUV models, while still in the video content, shouting elephants, hoping that it will come to Beijing to solve the problem in person.
On the 16th, the 38th sent a video response to why the manufacturer test video was released before. Because the elephant understood the car emperor to reply to the riders, said that the Versailles acceleration jitter was detected by technical experts, the data was normal, and also mentioned a mouth, and the owner measured it face to face.
After the video was broadcast, the elephant side took the video and released it, the content is to tell a Versailles racing owner who is not familiar with the Versailles automatic locking function, saying that the online content is not necessarily true, I hope you have the ability to distinguish. There may be a response from the side to the purpose of No. 38.
At present, the incident is still further escalating, how this farce should end, the author does not know, but we should still uphold, do not know the whole picture, do not comment on the attitude, ideal view of this incident.