Whether effort is important or talent is important, there is still no answer to this topic. Some people think that hard work is important, after all, diligence can make up for clumsiness, and talent can also be considered important, after all, genius is to look at the 1% talent. There is no shortage of talented and hard-working players in the NBA, but more people believe that talent is much more important than hard work. Especially looking at the achievements of these 5 people, you can understand whether talent is important or hard work is important.
Chamberlain's private life was a mess, and his affair was widely circulated in the NBA. Others are very disciplined, he is just finishing the game, in the NBA he really did not care on the track and field field. But Chamberlain is also in the top 10 of history, 100 points in a single game, various records to get soft, his talent is enough to make himself willful, his career and hard work have nothing to do with the word.
Barkley has always been gluttonous, and his weight has always been overweight. He has little resistance to sweets, and donuts are his favorite. But Barkley was just as successful, he was the shortest rebounding king in history, and he also won the MVP, as a big forward, he is also in the top 5 of history. Being able to take an MVP in the Jordan era is his confidence, and if there is a championship, the historical status will be much higher.
Rodman only started basketball at the age of 19, entered the NBA has always been a problem teenager, and was one of the team's thugs during the Pistons period. Rodman is also constantly lace, even going to gamble the night before the game and continue the game the next day. It is such a problem player, that is 7 consecutive years to win the rebounding king, he is Jordan's second triple crown absolute hero, he is also recognized as the strongest rebounder in history.
Finally, there is O'Neal, who is completely gamer attitude to playing the NBA. He often finds reasons to take turns, and his weight is also uncontrolled, or he is lazy in training, for which Kobe Bryant has also had a conflict with him. As a result, O'Neill still dominated the three-second zone, completed the domineering triple crown, destroyed all opponents under the basket, and he was the low beast. But if he tries, the first person in history may be him.
It can be seen that talent is indeed more important than hard work, hard work determines the lower limit, talent determines the upper limit, and some people even rely on talent to play and be as successful. But anyone who can become a historical superstar in the NBA is a talent, do you agree with this view?