The virtual world is the projection and reproduction of the real world.
The reason why keyboard men criticize the anonymous online world is largely because of their extreme attitude, stupid judgment, narrow cognition and contempt for truth, goodness and beauty. There is no framework of truth in unverified or never-confirmed events, which gives keyboard warriors a stage to exert their skills. They vent their grievances to the fullest, mercilessly insult those they despise, and unrestrainedly denigrate those who have nothing to do with them.
In them, there is no shadow of civilization, no warmth between people, no point of putting oneself in their place or feeling empathy. The darkness released by these people is the negative energy that they have accumulated for a long time and cannot be released.
For a healthy adult, soothing emotions in a reasonable way is a proper ability. But the keyboard men themselves have no barriers to build with knowledge, so that a little fictional remark can successfully capture them; they do not use reason to fight the power of lies, so that a little inflammatory words can arouse their appetite; their emotions are impatient and urgent, so that the slightest wind and shadow can make them trapped in it.
Therefore, the civilized society that the rational and the brave have worked so hard to create is always poked in the hole by these ignorant and cowardly, and even eaten back.
Watching this movie thought of the ZJ case. Because there is no evidence, no one can blame either side. But what we can see is that one side has made a lot of profits, and the other side has suffered and ruined a lifetime. If this is the reward of good and good and evil, it can also be regarded as the victory of truth over evil. If this is the result of a group of people who follow the trend of insults without knowing it, then everyone is to blame.
Although the little girl in the movie is the initiator, she has not been blamed and punished in any way, and even the male protagonist has been persecuted to this point and still treats her gently. In Orphans' Grudge, I discussed topics like "the evil of children."
If the life of man is compared to the history of human development, then the infancy period is equivalent to the stage of human beings' emergence. At that time, human beings were in a period of obscurantism, still using force to solve problems, had no sense of morality, and willfully handled things according to their natural mood preferences. If you say that humans in this period don't understand anything, so it's understandable that they kill people and set fires, I can't agree.
A child who lives in the same world as an adult, enjoys the same resources and services, and is treated even better than an adult, then according to the principle of reciprocity of rights and duties, the child should also bear the corresponding obligations, at least to abide by the norms of this world. If a child can make mistakes because of his young age and do not bear the corresponding consequences, then is it not ridiculous that any person with deficiencies can use his own deficiencies as an excuse to make mistakes, and even some adults can go to the hospital to prescribe a certificate of mental illness as soon as they make a mistake.
Moreover, minors have guardians, so doesn't the guardian's responsibility not need to be fulfilled when minors make mistakes? Just like someone has a dog that bites someone else, can't saying "the dog is careless" avoid the guilt of the dog owner's dereliction of duty?
Therefore, I suggest lowering the age at which minors bear legal responsibility, and the sooner they understand the law, the more they can abide by the law. Blind indulgence and disregard will only cause greater harm to society. What's more, we have seen the great impact of the words and deeds of minors on adults, and we only hope that everyone is equal before the law.
In a sparsely populated town, interpersonal relationships build an invisible wall. This wall is unstable, and it changes with people's relationships and perceptions of each other. It can trap a person in a safe area, or it can force an insider away. Everyone tries to cater to others for safety to avoid being isolated. The smaller and more enclosed the place, the more so.
A large place is sustained by institutions rather than interpersonal relationships, so there will be more just laws and morals to maintain order. Small places can only rely on knowing the roots to maintain the need for safety, rely on people-to-people news to integrate into the collective, and rely on the minority to obey the majority to ensure normal operation.
In this environment, the truth is not the most important, people think that the truth is; reason is not the most important, and being consistent with everyone is the basis for settling down. There are no scientific values to judge here, so this relationship built on hypocrisy is fragile, and it can be easily broken by lies and frames.
There is no open space for discussion, so no one dares to raise objections easily, and the power of authority cannot be shaken. Courage is not allowed, and when all are cowards, the victims are like trapped beasts, with no chance of survival.
"Hunting" is the behavior of the strong against the weak, and it can also be the behavior of a group of people against a person. It is the most primitive human activity, but also the most barbaric human activity. Irrational, unmerciful, bloody and cruel. What triggers "hunting" is man's deep-rooted prejudice, airtight ignorance, and unthinking follow-up. When a boy grows into a man, he is supposed to go on a "hunt" that symbolizes bravery and wisdom, but ironically, the bigger the man, the more he goes in the opposite direction.