As a basic right enjoyed by rural residents, the problems of over-occupation, abuse and idleness have been alleviated under the situation of shortage of homestead resources and the strict control of rural self-built houses by the state. At the same time, in order to maximize the use value of homestead land, the state has been committed to promoting the deepening and reform of the basic system in the past two years, and through the implementation of a series of reform measures such as the separation of the three rights, voluntary paid withdrawal, and the registration of the right to use, farmers have become more aware of the importance of homestead land.
As we all know, the allocation and use of homestead land must strictly comply with the basic principle of "one household and one house", that is, each rural family is allowed to own only one homestead, or the total area of multiple homesteads does not exceed the local standards for the use of homestead area. However, for a long time, the chaos of rural over-occupation of homestead land has emerged in an endless stream, and the problem of "one family and multiple houses" caused by over-occupation of area has not only caused a serious waste of resources, but also hindered the long-term sustainable development of the rural economy and urbanization construction.
Therefore, the state has ordered all localities to further strengthen the management of homesteads, strictly implement the basic principle of "one household and one house", and carry out centralized rectification of the problem of "one family and many houses" formed by many factors such as over-occupying the area and the purchase of other people's homesteads, and resolutely put an end to similar problems from continuing to appear more and more intense! It is reported that the disposal measures taken against multiple houses include the collection of tax on the over-occupation of homestead land, rectification within the time limit, and collective compulsory recovery of the excess area, etc., but the farmers have quite complained.
Some farmers have questioned why people in the city can have more than one apartment per household, but farmers need to follow the principle of "one household and one house". On the issue of "one family and many houses", an expert and scholar (Professor Cai Jiming of Tsinghua University) recently stood up to speak for the peasants and put forward the statement that "one household and one house" seems reasonable, but in fact it is not reasonable. He pointed out that most of the houses of the people in the city are still built on the arable land used for agricultural use in the past, so why do the people and farmers in the city have two sets of standards in parallel? This is extremely unreasonable.
Professor Cai Jiming believes that both urban and rural people have the right and freedom to pursue a better and happier life! But why can't rural families be allowed to enjoy the basic rights and interests of two sets of homestead houses? If this injustice is so unjust, should this restriction be lifted and farmers granted the right to use multiple homesteads? Xiaobian and Professor Cai have the same view, although a family and a house have played a role in protecting cultivated land resources to a certain extent, the housing needs of new sub-families are often difficult to meet at this stage.
However, from the perspective of basic needs and the level of the country, one family and more houses are not feasible in the countryside! Once "one family and multiple houses" is allowed, more farmers will choose to occupy arable land as homesteads in order to meet the temporary demand for land use, affecting grain production and endangering national food security. Moreover, once this phenomenon forms a vicious circle, it will be very difficult to end, and if the state forcibly takes back in the name of "one household and one house", it will inevitably cause greater contradictions! Therefore, it is not advisable to have more than one house!
Therefore, the best solution for a multi-family home is to allow each household to keep only one homestead, and the excess or over-occupied parts are collectively recycled and then distributed to farmers who do not yet have homesteads and rural families who have newly divided households to solve their most basic housing needs. It should be noted, however, that it does not apply to multi-homesteads that are caused by inheritance or legal buying and selling within the collective.
Finally, what Xiaobian wants to discuss with you is that for a multi-family house obtained through legal channels, do you have any better handling suggestions? In the face of such a shortage of homestead resources, how to punish unprovoked waste? Everyone is welcome to actively share their views.