Yun Daiying
(June 13, 1925)
In the past few days, I have found many foreign slaves' arguments, who speak completely from the side of the interests of foreigners and try their best to ease the tide of this time. One only had to flip through the June 11 China Evening News to reveal three absurd claims.
The first is the cheeky Jiang Kanghu's "narrowing the scope" and "discussing things on the facts." How to narrow down and deal with things? Naturally, Mr. Jiang means that if the Indian catch kills people, he only needs to ask the Indian catch, and if the foreigner kills the Chinese he only needs to pay fifty yuan per person according to the concession's routine, only in this way can He achieve Mr. Jiang's goal of "expecting to be fast". Tell Mr. Jiang that apart from imperialist lackeys like you who have this kind of thinking, our ideas are the opposite of yours. We want to expand the scope and absolutely oppose only discussing things on the spot, and we are preparing for a long-term struggle, and we do not have the mentality of "expecting it sooner". In order to prevent the occurrence of similar incidents in the future, we must withdraw the triage hall and cancel the consular jurisdiction, so that we will punish the murderer and compensate twice, and we must also punish the country concerned with serious punishment, so that they will not dare to be unscrupulous in the future. The so-called matter-of-fact discussion is the nonsense of treating the head with headaches, treating the feet with pain, and finding the most convenient way to perfunctory face. We must demand a fundamental solution, and we must take advantage of the great pain of this Chinese, strive to awaken everyone, and seek a long-term struggle for a fundamental solution. All arguments that the scope of the scope should be narrowed to a speedy end are the general foreign slaves helping the imperialists to reduce their responsibilities, and the people must not be deceived by them. If Mr. Jiang had listened to this and thought that this was a propaganda of red-sidedness and caused disputes between the country and the world, it would be better for him to study more communist theories and international realities, so naturally there would be less senseless terror, and he would not be able to open his mouth to this kind of ignorant talk in the future.
The second is the gentle Shanghai air of Liang Qichao, Fan Yuanlian, and so on, and Liang Qichao and others are so detached from the matter and put forward such things as "hoping that both sides should pay attention", which has fully expressed their lack of popularity. They have said a lot of "friendship consultations", "sympathetic understanding", "harmony between the two sides" and other nonsense, do they want to take this to the outsiders? Outsiders would never take their words into account; imagine the heat of this killing Chinese? This kind of outgoing traitor is condemned. They went so far as to say that "the situation in China is different from that of decades ago,...... In the event that outsiders could freely punish twenty years ago, it is now impossible not to ask the opinions of China, which have local relations, and the public opinion of the whole country. "It's really meaty! Twenty years ago, when Chinese did not know how to resist the incident of the free punishment of outsiders, Liang Qichao and others would not even need to issue such a declaration of easing the air! We absolutely oppose all attempts to ease the air in Shanghai, and we hope that the air in Shanghai and even in the whole country will be more tense, because on weekdays everyone does not pay attention to the necessity of abolishing unequal treaties, and only after this incident can the air in Shanghai and the whole country become more tense day by day, can everyone truly realize that unequal treaties must be abolished, and only then can everyone have the determination to abolish unequal treaties. Don't listen to such foreign slave traitors liang Qichao and other words, and prolong the fate of unequal treaties for decades.
The third is the most absurd study of Chen Tingrui's legal issues. I felt numb when I listened to what people were talking about in the middle of such cases, and One of Chen Jun's remarks was particularly disgusting for three days. Chen Jun taught us that we must sue the British court in China for the two matters of punishment and compensation, so he advocated the preparation of a considerable amount of money and the appointment of "Anglo-American" lawyers to "test their fairness in the court of the so-called civilized country." This kind of foreign slave's brain and voice actually had the Shanghai Student Union and the Eastern Wu Law Students Association attaching such importance to him, which really surprised me endlessly. Is the court of civilization fair enough to test him this time? We have not been slaves to the country, we have already been slaves to the country, and we should still strive to break the fate of our slaves; why should we not appeal to the strength of the people and the public opinion of the world for such a tragic killing, and we must also ask the lawyers of the enemy country and appeal to the court of the enemy country for an unknowable victory or defeat? Lawyers always help the robbers of the ruling class, and they do not approve of the "illegal" May Thirtieth Incident in their hearts, and they also want to shed blood on the martyrs in the May Thirtieth Incident to violate the police law, (many newspaper reporters say that the sins of students do not lead to death, they are all based on the law, affirming the crimes of students, but they think that the death penalties are too heavy!) Alas, the martyrs who shed blood died and knew the souls of this generation! How could such a man also make him express his opinion on the events of the May Thirtieth Revolution? Naturally I know that such people are opposed to all revolutionary action. But let me ask you, assuming that, according to his claims, the results of the experiments still prove that the courts of the "civilized country" are not fair, and what is the high opinion of these lawyers? alas! Civilized? The massacre on the main road, the looting and occupation of Shanghai University and other places, the capture and release of guns in Caojiadu and other places, the faces of bandits and robbers have been completely exposed to all people with eyes! Only you lawyers have no long eyes, and you can say such ignorant words!
Published in Nationalities Daily, No. 4
Signature: Dai Ying
