Over the years, actor-based reality shows have really been too hot.
The two variety shows of "Actors Please Take Place" and "I Am an Actor" will be on many hot searches every time they are broadcast.
Through these two programs, many excellent actors have also been trained.
But then again, with good actors, can the film and television drama industry get better?
Of course not, in addition to good actors, you also need good directors and good teams around you.
Only when the level of all departments is improved can we create higher quality film and television dramas.
Now there is such a reality show about director competition.
The name of the show is "Director Please Advise".
A total of 16 directors are gathered in the show, many of whom are new directors, and of course, cross-border.
For example, Han Xue, who is very familiar to everyone, is a singer and an actor, Liang Long, the lead singer of second-hand roses, and Wu Zhenyu, an actor who has made many movies, and so on.
In addition to the very strong lineup of directors, the four producers are also quite big names.
They are Wang Jing, Hao Lei, Fang Li, and Chen Zhixi.
Of course, in order to make the program more professional and more interesting, the program team also specially invited a team of film critics (professional film critics).
In general, this show is divided into five major teams, namely the director team of the competition, as well as the producer team, the film reviewer team, the actor team, and the audience team.
After the first episode of the show aired, the popularity and ratings were really very high.
However, in general, the main reason why the first episode of the show can catch fire is that it is lively.
In simple terms, it is all kinds of arguments and quarrels between the five teams, and the public is justified and the wife is justified.
Obviously, it is a variety show, and the audience is stunned to see the feeling of "palace fight drama".
A total of four directors' works were broadcast in this episode.
Among them, two of the most quarrelsome, one is Bi Zhifei's adaptation of "Spring in a New Town".
The other is liang long's adaptation of "Crazy Aliens" that we want to talk about this time.
To tell the truth, Liang Long's luck is very good, and he has already communicated with Pan Binlong before he plays.
Many directors such as Cai Kangyong and Bao Bell could not find anyone when choosing actors.
Liang Long has not yet begun to have The good actor Da Pan to help, it can be said that it is really like a tiger.
Needless to say, how good Pan Binlong's acting skills are.
Since Tai Pan can win the overall championship of "I Am an Actor", this is enough to prove everything.
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, if it weren't for The Big Pan, Liang Long, a script that is very abstract, can't be expressed in words, and doesn't show its face, really can't find an actor.
Liang Long's work this time is somewhat embarrassing, because he is the only one of the four works to be suspended.
When the work was called suspended, the audience could be said to be noisy.
Host Curran first asked the audience why they pressed the pause button.
At the time, an audience member said, "Because I didn't see clearly what the director was trying to say from beginning to end, I couldn't grasp the information he gave me."
After the audience finished speaking, Curran began to ask for the opinions of professional film critics.
A film critic named Wei Xiao said, "I just like it, there is no way, communication does not have to use language, beauty, not necessarily force, loneliness, not necessarily sadness, Liang Dao's things are worth pondering, I understand in a sense, some friends may have resistance or strangeness, but it is good, this is the truth."
Zhang Feibei said, "I especially like it, I think the sense of relaxation of Teacher Pan Binlong's performance, as well as the absurd way of expression in the video, makes you feel unobtrusive."
Yuan Zizi also said that he liked this work very much, and said that Liang Long was very surprised by a rock singer who came to be the director.
The professional film critic named DiBai said it a little unacceptably, she said, "This film is about the story of an outlier, this film is also an outlier, but when I see the public's attitude towards this outlier, I feel more sad and more absurd."
Of course, there is also this professional film critic, who directly tells the audience that they should vote after watching it.
I believe that many viewers have an illusion after watching the comments of these film critics, that is, the vast majority of film critics support Liang Long's film.
In other words, the film was suspended entirely because the audience didn't know how to appreciate it.
However, is this really the case?
Is Liang Long's adaptation of "Crazy Alien" really that good? In fact, we were all deceived by the program team.
Have you found a problem, we saw that the positive interview is buggy.
The program team only interviewed film critics who liked the film and audiences who did not like the film.
I don't know if the program team interviewed it this way at the time, or whether it was deliberately edited in the later stage.
Anyway, the audience in front of the TV set was finally presented with such a picture of a "mass movie group" vs. a "professional film group".
Don't you suspect that this is a trap for the program group?
To put it simply, the program team is using editing to lead the battle.
In fact, everyone only needs to watch the final vote to understand all this, to put it bluntly, we have all been deceived by the program group.
Each director's film will be suspended as long as it is less than 120 votes, Liang Long is 119 votes, of which the public attendance rate is 45%, and the professional attendance rate is 58%.
There were a total of 200 public viewing groups and 50 professional film team members.
According to the above ratio, 110 people in the live audience pressed the pause button, while 21 of the professional film critics pressed the pause button.
To put it bluntly, in the two teams of "mass movie group" and "professional film group", almost half of the people pressed the pause button.
However, the program group must choose what they don't like in the "mass movie group" and choose the one they like in the "professional film group" to interview.
Doesn't this prove that the program team is deliberately doing things?
For the audience in front of the TV, subconsciously they will feel that the film critics are more professional.
When you see that all the professional film critics are blowing this film well, they will naturally feel that the suspension is a matter for the live audience.
In fact, this is purely the program team deliberately throwing the pot to the audience, so that the audience became the evil person who suspended Liang Long's film.
As a program group, it is fairer to interview supporters and opponents in the "professional film group" and the "mass movie group" respectively.
Only in this way can the positive film be broadcast without causing misunderstanding.
Originally, half of the people in the two teams did not like it, but the program group had to cut it into the opposite, which was really embarrassing.
In addition to the "mass viewing group" and "professional film group", it can be seen from the choice of four producers that we were indeed deceived by the program group.
This time Liang Long was playing against Bi Zhifei, and judging from the number of votes, Liang Long lost to Bi Zhifei.
However, judging from the reputation of the two works, Liang Long is obviously better than Bi Zhifei.
After everyone argued, two female producers, Chen Zhixi and Hao Lei, expressed their support for Liang Long.
According to the rules of the program, if there are three producers supporting at the same time, then Liang Long can turn the tables.
However, the two male producers, Wang Jing and Fang Li, did not use the opportunity to flip The Plate for Liang Long.
Of course, they didn't just not use the flip opportunity against Liang Long, but they also didn't choose Bi Zhifei.
Honestly, isn't that obvious enough?
There are four producers in total, two who support Liang Long and two who do not support, isn't this also a 50% probability?
The comprehensive producer team, film critic team, and audience team analyzed it, and to put it bluntly, half of the people in the audience did not like his film.
Seeing this, everyone still wants to say that Liang Long's film is really good?
On this stage of filmmaking competition, Fang Li said that Liang Long is not a movie at all, at best a short video.
Because this is just a silent image, it does not conform to the market positioning of the film.
However, Hao Lei said that this can be called a movie, and she likes it very much.
From the perspective of the audience, what I want to say is, whether Liang Long's film is a movie or a short video, does it matter?
I want to ask you the simplest question, when you see a movie like this in a movie theater, how many minutes can you hold out?
Do you dare to guarantee that your two-hour movie will not leave the scene early?
If you see such a short video on your phone, it is even more impossible to last more than 30 seconds and slip away.
Simply speaking of this film, it is indeed meaningful, and there are many things that can be pondered in the content.
However, then again, what kind of film does not have positive energy that is worth thinking about?
Not to mention the directors of these professional films, even if ordinary people are allowed to be directors, everyone knows that they need to be meaningful.
The director who won the variety show "Director Please Advise" still has to make a movie, and the final face is still the audience.
If the audience doesn't like to watch it, it's just a movie that loses money.
Of course, Chen Zhixi also said that she would invest money in such a film, and she also recognized the loss of money, because it was meaningful.
In fact, I also agree with this point, after all, what kind of movies should exist, and the film market should be full of flowers.
However, under the format of the show "Director Please Advise", I don't think there is any problem with the audience.
Because of Liang Long's film, the whole audience is about to turn the sky upside down, so, from the perspective of the audience, do you think his film is good? Will you watch?