Immediately comment | the pot of paper checking, don't let Zhai Tianlin carry it alone

The Paper's special commentator Lu Jingwat

We often refer to "business ethics", and some business itself is a deviation from ethics, such as the false fire of the paper check.

The education chain is no small matter, for any college student, the importance and necessity of thesis check is self-evident. The breadth of people involved and the critical significance of its significance determine the nature of its differentiation from other services. The paper check itself has a strong public service attribute, which should have humane, standardized and reasonable standards. But nowadays, the paper check is not only expensive, but also very messy.

The first to eat are some students with general family conditions and poor living expenses. Because CNKI does not provide testing services for individuals, the number of checks provided by the school is very limited, students often have to go to Taobao and other platforms to buy weight check services, merchants sit on the ground to start, check a heavy often hundreds or even thousands of yuan, to borrow the words of one of my classmates, "More sad than writing a paper, is that the paper is written well but there is no money to check the weight."

In addition, these so-called double-check services carry a great risk of leaking privacy and the content of the paper. Many merchants in the platform are a collection of ghostwriting papers, weight checking, weight reduction in one, the reason why they can "mass-produce" papers, in addition to having a strong "washing" skills, or because they have a large number of paper resources in their hands. Your hard-earned graduation thesis is likely to be "purged" by them for a wave to help others get their degrees.

There are also many merchants who have the phenomenon of pit deception, and the check report provided is not from CNKI, which has a large error, which also "harms" many students.

Scary? Checking the graduation thesis is a requirement of the school and the country, and it is also the proper meaning of guiding students to follow the academic bottom line and academic norms, which is beyond reproach. But the question is that such a key link in the education chain is now so many risks and loopholes in terms of operation and privacy, and students have to bear it themselves.

What is even more absurd is that since CNKI's rehash service is only for institutions, the CNKI paper rehab service sold online can be said to be all illegal. For example, students at one school recently found that their school-provided double-check account had been stolen and hung as a commodity on an e-commerce platform for sale. Who is condoning such a violation?

There is no fear because of the huge demand, and the first thing that should be reflected is CNKI itself. If the personal weight check service can be appropriately opened at a specific time, or cooperate with the school to give the school more free check places, or make flexible adjustments to increase the number of checks for some students with special needs as appropriate, maybe everything will be different.

Fundamentally, as an enterprise that should have provided public services, CNKI did not provide better paper review services for everyone, reflecting its lack of public service awareness and service capabilities.

A monopoly is a reality, but it cannot become a "shop bully", otherwise it is not only a departure from the original intention of the enterprise, the disruption of the education ecology, and students and schools will also vote with their feet. Of course, in this process, can the school also be more considerate of students, take the initiative, and strive to fight for and provide better checking support for students?

In the past few days, many students have once again denounced Zhai Tianlin's "doctor" on the Internet because of the troubles caused by the paper check, but after venting, the focus of the problem cannot be deviated - to extinguish the false fire of the paper check, it is necessary to purify the market ecology; to put an end to the violation of the paper check, the platform must strengthen supervision, strike hard, and hit the head.

While safeguarding its own rights and interests, should CNKI also have a little more sense of responsibility and consider more for the student group that has no income?

Editor-in-Charge: Li Qinyu