If you disregard the bottom line just because it is "passive scolding", then you do not deserve the word "hanzi". Even if you insist that this is a bloody man, I am afraid that it can only be regarded as a Reckless Man of the Li Kui style.
Inadvertently brushed up on the netizen Shi Daojunyan's article "Want to know the truth about Jin Jun's intimidation?" Out of curiosity, I clicked in and looked at it.
"Active scolding" and "passive scolding"
After watching it, I was a little shocked and a little ashamed. A few days ago, I just posted an article expressing admiration for Jin Jun as a man, but I didn't expect to be punched in the face by him today.
At that time, I said this in "The non-famous poet Jin Jun is a man, but he can't carry the banner of "reforming poetry"":
What is even more rare is that in the face of ridicule, although he will also regurgitate and belittle the other party, it is different from the trolls and levers in my impression. He is pertinent in expounding his point of view, he is reasoning, not like a troll and a lever, rolling and messing around. This is the most commendable, so I respect him as a man. ”
However, in the face of reality, in the face of the "truth of Jin Jun's intimidation", I must admit my one-sidedness and ignorance, and at the same time apologize to some netizens who have been mistakenly injured because of this: I was sloppy, I was wrong!
Now, I formally update my point of view: the non-famous poet Jin Jun can neither carry the banner of "poetic reform" nor the word "Hanzi".
Before I respected him as a man, it was because I didn't know him comprehensively enough, but I just looked through some of his micro-headlines, and I agreed with some of his views, plus I saw many netizens besieging him, but I didn't see him have any excessive and out-of-the-ordinary rebuttal remarks. Therefore, it is believed that he really has the heart and tolerance of the people of a great country, as he said, and admiration arises spontaneously.
Jin Jun's micro-headlines
It wasn't until I saw the article on Shi Daojunyan today that I learned "the truth about Jin Jun's intimidation": it turned out that the non-famous poet Jin Jun only spat out fragrant aroma in the comments, and exported dirty, which was no different from the troll in my mind.
When I saw this truth, my previous good feelings for Jin Jun suddenly disappeared. However, judging from the meaning of the poem Daojun's text, Jin Jun's "intimidation" was forced out of helplessness and was "self-defense and counterattack-style scolding", which was a bit unjust.
But I don't think so. Judging from Jin Jun's "intimidating" remarks published by Shi Daojunyan, although he is "passive scolding", his viciousness and indecency are far more than "active scolding".
Moreover, those so-called "active scolding" are, in my opinion, just very common ridicule, not even insults, at best, yin and yang. For such comments, I believe that most people will only retort to each other, and people who are more generous will laugh.
However, the "passive scolding" of the non-famous poet Jin Jun is simply incomprehensible, and it seems that his irritated and angry expression can be seen across the screen. This has a little bit of the temperament and bosom of a Shandong Hanzi, and it is completely a small belly chicken intestine of a woman who complains in a boudoir.
I think this may be related to his understanding of poetry, because he has said more than once that "poetry should be directly lyrical to the chest", and the shrew scolding street can best reflect the expression of "straight lyrical chest". So, Jin Jun's "passive scolding" is actually writing poetry?
Jin Jun's "passive scolding"
Otherwise, could it be that Jin Jun's flaunted "should have the mind and tolerance of the people of a big country" is only aimed at "active scolding"? Although "active scolding" is wrong first, it is "more wrong", but should "passive scolding" give up the bottom line and reduce its self-worth to the extent that it is no different from the troll? This is something I don't agree with, legitimate defense and "excessive" it, not to mention that people's "active scolding" is not called insults, but it is just sarcasm.
In addition, I have seen Jin Jun's personal homepage that he has sued some "active scolding", and I don't know what the current progress is. At that time, I admired and approved of his move, because taking some unscrupulous trolls who were keen on insults, insults, and personal attacks to court could play an exemplary role.
But now, I would like to remind Jin Jun, while you hate other people's bad breath, have you forgotten that you did not brush your teeth? If you sue on the grounds of verbal abuse, can others sue you for the same reasons?
Also, a little digression. I would like to say sorry to the contemporary poet King Yingshi in passing, because before I satirized him in "After Reading the Introduction of the Contemporary Poetry King, I just want to say: Your Circle is Really Confident", thinking that he is arrogant and arrogant. However, then I saw that some netizens said that the "king of poetry" was just a joke and did not have to be taken seriously. I listened to him and paid attention to him.
Interesting contemporary poet king
Through observation in recent days, I found that the contemporary poet Wang Yingshi is really a more interesting person, and his poems are also well written, rich in imagery and profound in meaning. I now believe that his self-proclaimed "King of Poetry" is just a joke, and even if it is not, then he also has a certain arrogant capital. Instead, some "poets" whose names look modest seem arrogant and arrogant.
Finally, I should also thank the netizen Dr. Shidao Junyan. Because it was he who made me see the "truth about Jin Jun's intimidation", and thus realized my mistakes, and no road went to the black.