"Director Please Advise" aims to explore and cultivate some cutting-edge directors, and through the films brought by directors, "professional" producers, screenwriters, etc. can communicate, point out problems, and help improve. However, after the release of the first program, there were two biggest problems: 1. The performances of Actors Niu Junfeng, Zhu Zhixin, and Liu Shuyi were more exciting than the director's works; 2. The host Ke Lancheng was decorated, and most of the time he only broadcast advertisements to announce the number of votes for the film.
I believe that many viewers watch "Director Please Advise" in order to enjoy the films brought by these cutting-edge directors and enjoy the wonderful performances brought by some of the actors. However, after the first two films "Nezha Noisy Sea" and "Nezha" were presented, the performances of actors Niu Junfeng and Zhu Zhixin added color to the film, while the directing ability of directors Xiang Guoqiang and Bao Bell suffered great controversy.
The movie "Nezha Noisy Sea" really makes most viewers not understand what it is talking about and what the values it conveys are. Producer Fang Li did not understand, actor Li Chengru criticized him for not innovating, blinding a good actor like Niu Junfeng. I believe that most viewers also agree with Fang Li and Li Chengru's views.
Niu Junfeng's performance alone supported the whole movie, if it were not for the success of Niu Junfeng's performance, it would be able to attract the audience to follow his emotions, I believe that the audience and the audience in front of the screen would not insist on watching this film that is only ten minutes.
When the director Bao Bell is a newcomer, the actor Zhu Zhixin is a newcomer. When Bao Bell and Zhu Zhixin join forces to bring this "Nezha", which newcomer will be recognized? The "professional" people at the scene of "Director Please Take Place" gave the judgment: both people liked it.
Hao Lei and Chen Zhixi spoke highly of Bao Bell, and Fang Li and Yu Entai gave high recognition to newcomer actor Zhu Zhixin. Li Chengru, who has always been "willing" to criticize traffic stars and young actors, has reserved his views on Zhu Zhixin, but is more inclined to praise Liu Shuyi. Every "professional" person's evaluation of the director and the actor is inconsistent, which is why the show has been "fighting with each other".
Controversy and quarrel are inevitable, and it is possible that the greater the controversy and the greater the quarrel, the greater the contribution to the ratings of "Director Ask advice". But too much controversy and too long quarrels will make this variety show lose its original intention. Cultivating new directors, encouraging new directors, and allowing new directors to make better movies in the future is the purpose of the show. But for the general audience, the director comes up with a good work, the actor comes up with a good performance, and the "professional" person gives good advice, which is what I want to see the most.
In addition to the presentation of directors, actors and "professionals" in the show, actress Ke Lan crossed over to be the host this time, but her performance in the first episode of the show was not as wonderful as her acting skills. Whether a show is good or not, the role of the host is very large, if Ke Lan can reasonably mediate, string, and connect in the comments of these "professional" people, perhaps this variety show will look better.
Just reading advertisements and reading out the rules of the game, what is the significance of Ke Lan crossing over to be the host? Of course, it may also be that Curran's hosting content is a lot, but it was cut off later. What do you think of this show, welcome to the comments section to discuss.