The third round of the cba league Jiangsu home to meet Tianjin team, although Jiangsu team through extra time to 98-92 victory over Tianjin team, but the referee's blow penalty during the game, caused serious dissatisfaction of the general manager of Jiangsu team: because of the key moment to make obvious wrong judgments and missed judgments that were unfavorable to Jiangsu team, it was not the first time. In the first round of the game, because of the obvious omission of the key moment, the Jiangsu team lost to the Zhejiang team 96-97. Although the referee's report after the game admitted that Jiangsu should get a free throw opportunity at the last minute, the result of the game could not be changed, and Jiangsu suffered a black opening.
In the third round of the match against Tianjin, the referee made another unfavorable wrong decision against Jiangsu team, especially the technical foul on Shi Hongfei, which caused serious dissatisfaction among fans and Jiangsu team. At that time, Shi Hongfei had physical contact with Liu Shuai of Tianjin team in the process of possession of the ball, and the basketball touched Liu Shuai out of bounds, but the referee directly gave the ball to Tianjin team. Shi Hongfei was a little excited, and argued with the referee, asking the referee to look back. At this moment, the referee at the far end ran over and gave Shi Hongfei a technical foul.
Realistically speaking, the authority of the referee on the field must be respected, and if the player and the referee argue excessively, it is no problem to be blown off for technical fouls. However, the reason why the penalty caused the fans to discuss and the dissatisfaction of the Jiangsu team was that the referee who communicated with Shi Hongfei did not give a technical foul, which meant that he did not believe that the authority of his referee was provoked. However, the referee at the far end ran over to steal the scene and gave Shi Hongfei a technical foul, which is really incomprehensible: such a judgment is obviously unreasonable, whether a referee is provoked, does another referee need to judge?
Trick 1: Make protest calls publicly! After the game, a video of Shi Linjie, the general manager of the Jiangsu team, calling a leader of the CBA was circulated on the Internet. On the phone, Shi Linjie was very emotional and expressed his serious dissatisfaction with the referee.
Trick 2: Ironic announcement! This is perhaps the most black humor in the history of the CBA. This announcement may continue to be mentioned in the future: ... Although the challenge was successful, he was sentenced to technical fouls for not having the right expression when applying for the video replay challenge... Therefore, the club decided to give a serious warning to the player Shi Hongfei, and imposed a penalty of suspension of training for one day, ordering him to seriously reflect and be sure to do a good job in expression management in future games.
Trick 3: Social Media Spit! It seems that the real grievances of General Manager Shi Linjie have reached the extreme, and after the above 2 protests, he still can't calm his mood, so he complained on his personal social media: Severely criticize Shi Hongfei! Challenge video playback Please pay attention to the emoticon! Next time better get down on your knees and say!
Public protest calls + ironic announcements + social media complaints, Shi Linjie's 3 consecutive moves, but also caused heated discussion among fans. Some fans said: Shi Linjie's 3 consecutive moves are too amateurish, there are opinions on the judgment, and they can appeal through the formal process, so why put these things in front of the public? This will seriously affect the image of CBA! My personal opinion is that maybe he doesn't want to use the power of public opinion, but sometimes other methods may not work, or they may not have any effect at all.
Can't stand the CBA referee? Surely, otherwise Slynjie would not have taken such a radical approach, but is it really only the referee who makes Slynjie intolerable? But in any case, Shi Linjie's way of handling it, it is inevitable to be punished. The CBA official announced the punishment for Shi Linjie this evening: notification of criticism, 1 game suspension, and a fine of 50,000 yuan! In response, the Jiangsu team responded: it is the right to communicate disputes and impose penalties, and the club will continue to file a complaint!
It seems that Shi Linjie is going to be on the bar this time! I hope that through this incident, it can play a positive role in promoting the referee's blowing level and fairness. For Yao Ming's basketball reform, I think the first thing that needs to be reformed is the referee.