Meaning = meaning + meaning (Zou Xiaohui proposed this large string formula that seems simple on the surface but is quite rich in connotation).
The unified popularization of meaning, intention, and object-based expression is popularized into popular common sense; the unified professional expression based on literature becomes the subject knowledge, professional terms and field paradigms. -Zou Xiaohui made this statement today thanks to the three basic categories of material and italian literature of Rongzhixue and its highly generalized effect on phenomenal information.
It is better to speak than to speak of words
2009-12 | conference-paper
Included in "Century Dialogue- A Multi-angle Study of Chinese Character Standard and Word Standard"
description
"It's better to talk than to be word-based"
Zou Xiaohui, Zou Shunpeng
Institute of Higher Education, China University of Geosciences (Beijing).
Abstract: This paper reviews several "basic" transformations in Chinese language research, and believes that this is the logical starting point for predecessors to explore the construction of Chinese theoretical systems. If one must choose between words, then Zhao Yuanren's assertion that "character is the central theme in Chinese's mind" and Xu Tongjun's assertion that "'word' cannot represent 'word' but become a basic structural unit of Chinese" have all chosen characters. Previously, others chose words (Ma Jianzhong 1898), sentences (Lai Kam Hee 1924), and phrases (Zhu Dexi 1982). Why? Didn't zhao and Xu, the two linguistics professors, understand the common sense meanings of words and words? Apparently not. They made these assertions on the basis of academic intuition. Is there an academic meaning behind their academic intuition? This is the question and reflection raised by the author. This paper analyzes the academic meanings of words and words from two levels and multiple perspectives, such as macroscopic classes and microscopic examples, and finds that common sense terms are often the causes of non-academic controversies. This study adopts the combination of historical theory and academic classification methods, and through the two-eight classification of the two subsystems of "language" and "character", highlights the characteristics of "overlapping" syllables, characters and words, and concludes that "Chinese is the canonical system of group character idioms". Lu Jianming and Feng Zhiwei both said that if the word standard was replaced by a morpheme standard, no one would oppose the word standard anymore. Therefore, in order to avoid the non-academic controversy caused by the formulation of the character standard, it is better to say that words are the basic structural units of the Chinese language than words, so that we can concentrate on the relationship between characters (Zhou Shangzhi), the relationship between words (Pan Wenguo), the relationship between words and languages (Zou Xiaohui) and the relationship between several sets of terms and their relationships (this is one of the efforts to try to unify understanding within the character standard). Keywords: general linguistics, formal informatics, Chinese formalization, logical starting point of Chinese language studies, character standard, speech standard
2009-12 (Shanghai: The First International Symposium on the Theory and Teaching of Chinese Uniqueness Proceedings: 2013-1-1 Peking University Press: Century Dialogue: Multi-angle Research on Chinese Character And Word Standard Paperback)