laitimes

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

Strictly speaking, Xu Jie took advantage of Jiajing's jealous psychology to frame Yan Shifan for "traffic and rebellion", and finally eliminated Yan Shifan.

This means is absolutely "nonsense" and is not honorable. But Yan Shifan's death was absolutely unjust.

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

The Jiajing Dynasty was a period of elite people, and the cabinet of the Jiajing Dynasty can be called the peak of the Ming Dynasty's power and wisdom. Jiajing did not go to the court for 20 years, asking for immortals, but holding the Tao Te Ching in one hand and the pestle in the other, firmly controlling the authority.

Jiajing put the cabinet in front of the stage and hid himself behind. But not giving a clear perversion to anything, not taking a stand means not taking responsibility. Everything is guessed by the cabinet elites, so such a leader is very difficult to serve.

Anyone he pushes to the front of the stage is dangerous. However, Yan Song was pushed to the front of the stage by Jiajing for 20 years, but he turned his hand into a cloud and overturned his hand into rain, and his most important think tank was Yan Shifan.

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

Yan Shifan's psychology towards Jiajing can be described as thorough to the limit. Not only can he fulfill his heart, but he can also use Jiajing's psychology to kidnap Jiajing through Jiajing's vanity, face, death and inconceivility, and other weaknesses, so as to complete his father and son.

Xu Jie attached himself to Yan Song for 20 years and endured for 20 years. He was actually doing one thing, that is, learning Yan Song's model of Yan Shifan, letting Yan Song and Yan Shifan relax their defenses against it, penetrating Jiajing's heart, looking for opportunities, and "using the other way to give back to the other body" to eradicate Yan Song's father and son.

Therefore, Xu Jie's means of eradicating Yan Shifan were the same as the way Yan Song and Yan Shifan eradicated Xia Yan, Shen Lian, Yang Jisheng and others, conspiracy, thick blackness, and no glory to speak of.

In the 41st year of Jiajing (1562), when Yushi Zou Yinglong accused Yan Song's father and son, in fact, Jiajing also knew that someone had to bear the blame for the situation of heavenly anger and resentment. But he is still inseparable from the father and son. Therefore, Yan Song retired, and Yan Shifan was assigned to Leizhou. This is Jiajing's explanation to the public, and the matter ends here, which is jiajing's bottom line.

However, many people can't understand this relationship, and they all think that if they want to beat up the falling water dogs, Yan Song Yan Shifan has lost his position, and they must be prevented from resurgence, and they must be killed.

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

In the 43rd year of Jiajing (1564), Yushi Linrun, who patrolled the river, sued Yan Shifan and Luo Wenlong for snaring The Great Thief of Jiangyang, privately using illegal vehicles, slandering the imperial court, and secretly storing soldiers.

Yan Shifan was actually "doing business", but he broke a Jiajing bottom line, that is, Yan Shifan's people were not allowed to contact the sword soldiers, so Yan Shifan was arrested and tried. However, Huang Guangsheng and others began to overturn the cases of Shen Lian, Yang Jisheng and others who were overthrown by Yan Song Yan Shifan, and each crime was conclusive and the evidence was sufficient.

However, only two people could understand it, and the more so, the more Yan Shifan could not die. One is Yan Shifan himself, and the other is Xu Jie.

People were killed by Yan Shifan, but the orders were given by Jiajing. Suing Yan Shifan is equivalent to suing Jiajing. Even if he knew that Shen Lian and Yang Jisheng had been wronged, he could not admit that he was wronged by Yan Shifan's persecution of Shen Lian and Yang Jisheng, and wouldn't that be equivalent to telling the people of the world that he was faint, appointed adulterers, and killed Zhongliang?

Therefore, this evidence of guilt cannot require Yan Shifan's life, but on the contrary, it will take the lives of Huang Guangsheng and others. Political struggles are often like this, there is no right or wrong, only gains and losses. A stick can't kill, just don't do it, otherwise it will be counterproductive.

Therefore, after Xu Jie saw this, he immediately stopped Huang Guangsheng and others, and the evidence of these reversals of the case absolutely could not be presented. It can only strengthen the evidence of crimes such as "traffic robbery, conspiracy and rebellion". More critically, Xu Jie also fabricated that Yan Shifan occupied a piece of land with royal strength in his hometown in Jiangxi.

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

This "unwarranted" evidence immediately pierced Jiajing's heart. Yan Shifan, what exactly do you want to do? Want to rebel and usurp power? Can't wait a minute, kill, have to kill.

Without Yan Shifan, Yan Song, who is more than 80 years old, is even less likely to have the opportunity to turn over. Xu Jie finally became the first assistant to the cabinet. Without Yan Song and Yan Shifan's constraints, Xu Jie began to rectify and began to restore the economic order of Daming.

——Fried rice original debut, welcome to pay attention to or spit -

Why do some people say that the murder of Yan Song's son Yan Shifan was an unjust case?

Read on