This article was first published in "Tianya Current Affairs", and the number of the main authorized push
It is a book written by Wu Zhou Kulai Junchen, a book dedicated to how to fabricate charges and frame and kill people. When zhou xing, a cool official, was dying, he read this book and sighed to himself that he was willing to die; Di Renjie, the prime minister of a generation, read this book in a cold sweat, but did not dare to cry out injustice; Empress Wu Zetian faced this book and sighed: Such a clever heart, it may not be too late.
To this day, the book is also regarded as the crowning work of conspiracy science.
To be honest, in the 4 years since Trump was elected us president, there has been a lot less public knowledge active on the Internet, but with Biden's rise to power, public knowledge has begun to be active again.
In just a few short months, Hu Xijin, Jin Canrong, and Chen Pingren have been systematically smeared, and yesterday I saw an article smearing Hu Xijin in the group.
We put a mosaic on the name and author, not for fear of offending people, but because we didn't want to add "fans" to him.
When I saw this article, the number of clicks has reached 67,000, there are 133 likes, more than 3,000 likes, and more than 2,300 are looking at this article, and this data is not low.
This article is a typical well-known way of writing.
Below we will expose to you their silly and sweet methods.
Some time ago, the boiling noise on the Internet was: There are rumors that Hu Xijin has a son abroad.
This man has brought this matter out again to talk about it.
See what he said?
The man wrote in the article: "The question of whether Lao Hu has a son abroad has always been very vague. Many people have clearly confirmed that Lao Hu has a son abroad, and Lao Hu himself has repeatedly denied it in the face of reporters, but only said that he has a daughter and wants to have a son. ”
Do you see the doorway to this way of writing?
Yes, its "doorway" is: this kind of writing, Hu Xijin can never "falsify".
Why?
Because this person did not say who Hu Xijin's son was, there was no name, no photo, and no date of birth.
If Hu Xijin wants to prove that he has no illegitimate children, then he must prove that all the men in Canada who meet the conditions have to prove that the DNA of those men has nothing to do with Hu Xijin.
Obviously, Hu Xijin has no way to do this.
Without this, Hu Xijin would have no way to prove that he was telling a lie.
Since those people are convinced that Hu Xijin has a son abroad, they must have seen it and must have detailed information, so why don't they publish the address, name, and photo of Hu Xijin's son?
Because the rumors were punctured - as long as Hu Xijin found his "son" and made a DNA comparison, the truth was immediately revealed.
This is the first known method of rumor-mongering: it creates rumors that make you never be able to falsify them.
If you just say such a paragraph, you may be able to fool some stupid white sweets and hate the Kuomintang, but it is not easy to be convincing, because Hu Xijin has publicly stated on the Internet before this: he only has one daughter and no son.
Therefore, this public knowledge also said this paragraph: "I think that there was an official in the southwest who also denied that he had a son, and as a result, a son suddenly appeared a few years later, which is the usual trick of big people, so it is understandable that others have doubts about Lao Hu." ”
What is the purpose of his words?
It is to tell everyone that Hu Xijin's words are not credible, and there is also a precedent of "saying that he has no son, and the result is a son" in the past, so as to prove that his inference is reasonable.
If it is only so, I am afraid that people who are slightly smarter will not be deceived, so he said another paragraph: "Wang Yajun mentioned the problem of Lao Hu's foreign sons on Weibo, if Lao Hu really has no sons abroad, Lao Hu can directly accuse Wang Yajun of spreading rumors, which is the most powerful rebuttal, but Lao Hu just avoided this problem, which is really not in line with normal thinking habits, and it is even more suspicious." ”
This passage is very powerful, and people with a slightly lower IQ will have questions: "Yes, if this person is a rumor Hu Xijin, why doesn't Hu Xijin refute it?" Why not sue him? This shows that Hu Xijin did have a son. ”
That's where his "cleverness" lies.
However, I would like to ask: Who is Wang Yajun? How big is the character? Is it necessary for Hu Xijin to respond individually?
If Hu Xijin responded to Wang Yajun, there would immediately be Li Yajun, Hu Yajun, Zhao Yajun...
Does Hu Xijin have to respond constantly?
Just like when I write an article, I will be insulted every time I write an article, but most of the time, I can't take it seriously: I like to scold people so much, if I "calculate" with them, then I will not do anything for a day.
This is the second known method: you do not have the energy to refute the rumors one by one, and you do not have the energy to use legal means to protect your reputation.
For this kind of public knowledge, you have one sentence: Since you said that Lao Hu had a son abroad, then you came up with evidence?
After smearing Hu Xijin with an "overseas son" who is difficult to prove the truth, he began another "performance", saying: "Wang Yajun expressed that he fully supported Hu Xijin's initiative, as long as Old Hu let his son go to the battlefield, he was willing to donate three months' salary. ”
Why did he say this?
Because a few days ago China announced that in the Sino-Indian border conflict last year, 1 person in China was seriously injured and 4 people were killed, and some people said on the Internet that they did not want to fight and did not want to be soldiers, so Hu Xijin angrily rebuked those people and said: "If you don't want to fight, get out!" Commander Qi Fabao roared angrily at the distant border. I think that if the motherland needs it, men should live and die like them. ”
Then, what did the "troll" named Wang Yajun do?
He said something like this: "... If Hu Xijin's son goes to war after graduating from abroad, I will donate three months' salary! If Jin Canrong's son comes back from Canada and goes to the front line, I will donate 5 months' salary..."
You can see it.
This person is a typical "troll".
Their logic is ugly: what you support, you have to "lead by example."
The police are dangerous, you support the police, you must let your son become a policeman, otherwise what you say is a lie, that is, unpatriotic; firefighters are dangerous, you support firefighters, you must let your son become a firefighter, otherwise what you say is a lie, that is, unpatriotic; being a soldier is dangerous, you support soldiers not to be afraid of sacrifice and dare to fight, you must let your son become a soldier, otherwise what you say is a lie, that is, unpatriotic...
Isn't it ridiculous that you say this logic?
Don't say that Hu Xijin does not have a son, even if Hu Xijin has a son, there is no need to let his son become a soldier to prove his patriotism: everyone's ability is different, serving the country may not necessarily be able to become a soldier, there are many ways - you have achievements in science and technology, that is also to serve the country; if you contribute politically, then you also serve the country; if you contribute to the economy, it is also to serve the country...
You have to let a scientist give up his research and take up a gun to fight, you have to let a soldier with only a junior high school education to engage in nuclear physics, you have to let a designer farm...
Is this the right thing to do?
The son of Jin Canrong studied international politics, and you have to ask the son of others to become a soldier.
Then he also said "donate 5 months' salary" in a big way, which is really incomprehensible.
Therefore, this is the third known method: stirring up wild entanglements.
Every time I write, there are trolls spraying me, and most of the time I don't pay attention to them, but sometimes when I am upset, I will scold the trolls in the background to ease the mood.
Hu Xijin is also a person, when he is in a bad mood, when he sees those cool words, it is naturally impossible to control his emotions every time. Therefore, Hu Xijin made a response: "You also deserve to say this about Old Hu? Lao Hu has been in the army for 11 years, and after being a journalist, he has experienced two wars and heard the chirping of bullets in his ears. You bloody snob who is not even as good as a eunuch, but wants to prove that you are still quite noble! ”
This is good, immediately let the public know catch a chance.
He said, "... Lao Hu, however, was gently placed by Wang Yajun in the middle of the cave, and turned into anger with a kind of annoyance that had never appeared before, and rebuked Wang Yajun. ”
Is it strange to see this well-known logic?
How would I react if I intimidated someone I didn't like and I ran to the Internet and sincerely voiced that a female member of his family had an indescribable relationship with her pet?
If he doesn't respond, it's acquiescence; if he's in a hurry, it's poking at his sore spot.
I don't know if that's the way it is.
I really hope that the public can give me an answer, otherwise my heart will not be happy.
This is the fourth known method: I can talk nonsense, but you must not resist, otherwise you will be weak-minded.
Do you think that's the end of it?
Hu Xijin is a person within the system, and normal people must of course maintain the system.
After all, eating in a bowl like Yuanyuan looking into the pot, and scolding niang when eating, ordinary people can't reach such a skeletal realm.
As a result, it became a "feminine slave knee" in the mouth of the public.
On the contrary, Wang Yajun, who has been spreading rumors and nonsense all day, has become a "fighter" who "thinks independently" and dares to speak out.
Let's see, in a short article, how many techniques are used in this public knowledge?
In fact, there are far more well-known techniques than the above.
For example, there is also a kind called "taking meaning out of context".
Do you remember that some time ago there was a public knowledge of smearing Jin Canrong?
The cause of the incident was that Jin Canrong held a big wedding in Beijing for his son who had studied in the United States.
This was given the opportunity by some public knowledge, and they sent a screenshot saying: Jin Canrong opposed sending his children out to study abroad, but as a result, he sent his own children out to study abroad. Sure enough, anti-American is work, and going to the United States is life.
So, has Jin Canrong ever said this?
Jin Canrong's original words were: "When I was a child, junior high school and high school sent his children to study, he did not adapt to that situation at all, and then he spent money on his old nose, the family was also broken, the two sides were separated, and the children were harmed, so I was quite opposed to sending the children out." ”
People say very clearly that he is only opposed to sending children from junior high school and high school to the United States to study, and he is not opposed to sending children with college or higher degrees to the United States to study!
Junior high school students, high school students have not yet formed their own outlook on life, values and world view, you send him out is likely to harm the child, many of our children go abroad to come back to the high-handed and even their parents are looking down, feel that they are not a character! However, college students are different, college students have formed their own outlook on life, values and world view, he has a relatively strong ability to identify, not easy to be "brainwashed".
The United States disgusts us all day long, and we naturally have to disgust him, is there a problem with Commissar Kim's "anti-Americanism"?
No problem at all.
I have also seen many videos of Commissar Kim, and what people say is very good, all of them are reasonable, and there is no nonsense.
Can't anti-Americans let their children study in the United States?
The United States is not a country with pus on its head and sores on the soles of its feet, it is a big country with its own characteristics, for example, the science and technology of the United States is very advanced, I oppose it, but I go to learn its advanced things, and then come back to serve my own country, is there a problem? Those who have read my articles also know that I have written articles many times mentioning that China and the United States are both great countries, and the fight was originally for peace!
Jin Canrong's son studied international political science, and after studying in the United States, he learned more about American politics, and then brought the knowledge he learned to China, so that we have a deeper understanding of American politics and formulate more appropriate countermeasures.
There is also a kind of called "nonsense".
Everyone may have seen it in the past few days, and some public knowledge has begun to focus on Professor Chen Ping again.
Chen Ping said that Chen Ping has a large villa in the United States.
Let's not say whether there is one or not, and if there is, what is the problem?
Professor Chen Ping has lived in the United States for many years and studied the United States for many years, is there a problem with a house in the United States? Do you have to sleep on the street? Do people have problems with large villas? Who says patriotic people can't live better?
Is there an inevitable relationship between anti-Americanism and living in the United States and owning a place of residence?
However, they use this way to smear Professor Chen Ping, which is not called "nonsense"?
However, this kind of nonsense can still attract some people's attention.
In addition, there is another known method called "moral kidnapping".
In addition to Hu Xijin, Jin Canrong, and Chen Pingren, who were known to have been "besieged" by various means and in an organized manner, a few years ago, the famous physicist Yang Zhenning was also besieged by some well-known people.
In the 1950s, Yang Zhenning and R.L. Mills collaborated to propose a non-Abel gauge field theory; in 1956, he and Li Zhengdao collaborated to propose the law of non-conservation of cosmology in weak interactions; did a lot of pioneering work in particle physics and statistical physics, proposed the Young-Baxter equation, opened up a new direction for the study of quantum integrable systems and multibody problems, etc.
He made landmark contributions in the fields of particle physics, statistical mechanics and condensed matter physics, and was the winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics.
In 2003, he returned to Beijing to settle down.
In February 2017, he renounced his foreign nationality to become a Chinese citizen and officially became an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
What a good thing it is for a person who has made such a great contribution in the field of physics to give up his foreign nationality and return to China to serve the country.
As a result, some well-known people continue to use his 54-year-old wife on the Internet (in 2004, 28-year-old Weng Fan married 82-year-old Yang Zhenning), all kinds of rumors and smears.
Old husband and young wife, is there a problem? This is a symbol of male charm, and the envy of many people has gone to [teeth]
In this world, there is more love across ages, Yang Zhenning has neither violated Weng Fan's wishes nor the law, why can't they be together?
However, those people continue to hype this problem, and their purpose is nothing more than to guide everyone to the moral level, so as to completely stink Yang Zhenning and hinder the progress and development of Chinese physics.
How bad do you say these people are?
There is status and learning, see the problem can not be asked indissipity to solve the way, like to stand on the high side of the criticism of others good debate and combat. These are the three common characteristics that I have summarized, but there is a saying in the Analects: "Aspiration to the Tao, according to virtue, according to benevolence, and to travel in art!" ", the things that are keen to indulge and repeatedly play with are the least important in the eyes of the ancients, and I hope that these intellectuals will learn the correct way of mind of the ancients and be an intellectual who is beneficial to the people.