Ma Yun has said a lot, now analyze three of his views and see how ridiculous! This analysis has no meaning of "falling into a well", only the willingness to look at it objectively.
Logic one: 996. I think it is a great blessing to have the opportunity to get a high salary in a company that can 996!
Ma Yun should not understand the origin of May Day International Labor Day. On May 1, 1886, hundreds of thousands of workers in the United States and Canada participated in mass strikes and demonstrations demanding improvement of working conditions and the introduction of an 8-hour working day, which was brutally suppressed. That is to say, the 8-hour working day is the struggle between the working class and the capitalists, which is exchanged for blood. At present, both the evil capitalism and our socialist countries have been established at the legislative level. I don't know if Ma Yun has seriously read "Capital", capitalists originally wanted to squeeze the absolute surplus value of workers by extending the working time, but more than 100 years ago they found that it did not work, so they changed to squeezing the relative surplus value of the working class, that is, by improving labor productivity. As a 21st century China, it is a big step backwards to "encourage" the 12-hour work system (Ma Yun's class will not think it is a regression, they are not as good as the capitalists of more than 150 years ago). Of course, it is their own business to have more than 8 hours in themselves, because they are shareholders and completely voluntary, and cannot be asked of others;
Logic two: Taobao sells counterfeit and shoddy products and has nothing to do with Taobao, because Taobao itself does not produce counterfeit and shoddy!
Too many fake and shoddy on Taobao is already a well-known thing, just as Ma Yun believes, fake and shoddy originally exists, it exists! However, Taobao did not do its duty to block these products, in fact, it provided a large platform for counterfeiting and shoddy, which greatly promoted the circulation of counterfeit and shoddy products, "the crime is unforgivable".
Logic three: Alipay's high interest comes from the customer's high risk, because people in the financial industry understand a truth, that is, risk and return are complementary.
Ma Yun's speech contradicts himself. Through big data analysis, Alipay has successfully controlled the risk, or controllable risk, which is the value of Alipay! That is, there is a relatively stable bad debt rate! Why did the ant say that it can be listed? It is related to the controllability of risks! If the risk is uncontrollable, then listing is completely harmful. Since the risk is controllable, why do you have to charge such a high interest rate? So much so that it becomes a money-making machine? Isn't it universally accessible to the people? That interest is comparable to the bank to match the risk and return. On the one hand, the reason for charging high interest is that there is a high risk; on the other hand, telling others that through "high technology", the risk of ants is not large, or even no risk.
The above three points, is there no big problem with Ma Yun's logic?
