For a long time, the aesthetics of science and technology has been regarded as China's three major "evaluation institutions" with zealer and aibu, and has many fans and fans on the Internet, including NaYan himself, who also has a high reputation on the Internet.
The greater the reputation, the greater the controversy, especially its relationship with mobile phone manufacturers is often attacked by netizens, and the voice of "just rice" is endless. On the evening of March 21, Na Yan officially explained the development status of scientific and technological aesthetics, business scope, media content and so on. But the most important thing is that Nayan explained their team's relationship with Xiaomi.
To interject, "China's three major evaluation institutions" is just the opinion of netizens. Otherwise, where do we put the China Mobile Communications Research Institute and the Thiel Laboratory? This is a digression.
First of all, Nayan released a major data, in 2019, the evaluation video content accounted for 3.4% of all video content of the scientific and technological aesthetics team, and the evaluation content accounted for 0.9% of all content. None of this matters.
Secondly, Na Yan frankly believes that as a commercial organization, it will definitely collect money. He has explained and emphasized this issue many times in the past. Scientific and technological aesthetics already has relevant content of doubts, and everyone is interested in seeing it for themselves.
The point came, and Na yan officially responded. There are two companies under his name, one is "Harbin Daoli District Nayan Science and Technology Aesthetic Design Studio" and the other is "Harbin Stroll Shepherd Technology Co., Ltd." Among them, related to Zhang Peng's investment is the latter Ramskin Company, and Xiaomi is regarded by many netizens as Xiaomi's "investment" in the aesthetics of science and technology because it invested in the "Beijing Legend Geek Management Consulting Co., Ltd." founded by Zhang Peng.
Na Yan borrowed the logic of netizens "A invests in B, B invests in C, which is equal to A invests in C", and also lists other companies that have an "investment" relationship with scientific and technological aesthetics, including bat three giants, today's headlines, Samsung and Huawei. Na Yan even used Tianyan to find that there seemed to be an "investment" relationship between Huawei and Xiaomi.
It has to be said that due to the lack of knowledge of enterprises and equity by most people, the false logic of "A invests in B, B invests in C, which is equal to A invests in C". All in all, Na Yan finally responded to the relationship between scientific and technological aesthetics and xiaomi in a ridiculous way: as of March 2020, the investment, shareholding, holding, operation and online transmission of the xiaomi system of [scientific and technological aesthetics] have nothing to do with each other.
Finally, Na Yan also hopes to become a shareholder of Xiaomi Group next week by buying Xiaomi shares.