The scientific and technological aesthetics is suspected of brushing amount fraud, and the person in charge Na Yan admitted that the data of the "brushing list" is true
Regarding the fact that the industry's non-well-known WeChat "technology aesthetics" was exposed to fake brush traffic, you will see the following in this article, including its person in charge Na Yan personally acknowledged the list data.
"Scientific and technological aesthetics" was exposed to the cause of brush fraud
Is the published data true?
How much "technological aesthetics" brushes?
How does "tech aesthetics" match loyal users?
Where does the "aesthetics of science and technology" go after the brushing fraud incident?
This article is 3210 words, it takes about 8 minutes to read
"Scientific and technological aesthetics" was exposed to the cause of WeChat brush volume fraud
Hello everyone, I am Na Yan, the person in charge of the technology WeChat "Science and Technology Aesthetics".
Many friends should know the news of the crazy circle of friends in these two days: on September 28, the number of articles read by the WeChat public account dropped seriously, it is said that it was because Tencent modified the data interface, resulting in the failure of the brushing fraud tool, and some of the weChat large numbers noted leaked out of the fox tail.
Tencent officials listed several public accounts suspected of brushing, some of which were lying guns.
Many public accounts on the 27th and 28th have changed dramatically in the two days, making people have to be suspicious.
Some media also listed many suspected "traffic decline lists". At first, I didn't care, the list was too long, hundreds of accounts, well-known unheard of.
However, that changed later
A large number of netizens on Weibo said:
Thanks to us for believing in you so much, your "scientific and technological aesthetics" is actually fake?
Even some of my old friends cared about me and said:
That rock, has it been experiencing economic difficulties recently?
My classmates came and quietly asked me:
Have you been unwell lately and want to leave more money for your family?
Another friend firmly supported me and said:
That rock don't be afraid, brush a little amount, who doesn't brush ah?
The old king next door, who had not spoken for a long time, also came over and said:
Then big brother, you can rest assured, after the family affairs will be handed over to me, right?
I say:
Look at my mouth shape
g-u-n ！
Suddenly the world was scornful of "technological aesthetics" and I was puzzled
A confused face
After driving away the old queen, I quickly went to see this "fake brushing list"
To be precise, the "fake brush volume list" should have been originally called the "traffic decline list" The original text of the list is relatively long, there are hundreds of good, we only intercept a small paragraph. It doesn't matter if you don't look, take a look
I rub, our "scientific aesthetics" is finally on the list, and it is still at the top. Yellow on the bottom
How I turned yellow
The onlookers said one after another: Liars, stinky face
Fans of "scientific and technological aesthetics" are heartbroken: I can't imagine that your thick eyebrows and big eyes have also betrayed the revolution
Scared I quickly went to verify the data, so this "traffic drop list" is also the "fake brush list" data transmitted on the Internet is real?
Is the traffic drop list data real and credible?
There are many old fans of "technological aesthetics" who firmly stand on our side, leave messages to support us, and seriously question the authenticity of this list data.
The list shows that the average number of reads of "technological aesthetics" on the 28th is 37,000, far lower than the usual 50,000-60,000. All of a sudden, it dropped by 40%! This comparison is obviously the amount of brushing.
As the operator of the "science and technology aesthetics" WeChat, after carefully verifying the list data, I must explain the authenticity of the data of the list to everyone. I'm sorry that I didn't take this list seriously at the beginning, and I didn't explain it clearly to everyone at the first time.
Na Yan hereby apologetically acknowledges:
The amount of "scientific and technological aesthetics" read by the "Counterfeit Brush Volume List" is real
The onlookers again said:
Dare to admit the amount of counterfeit brushing in public? We also respect you as a man.
If you are not in a hurry to leave, please allow me to say a few more words before scolding.
We found the source of the list and carefully read the list description. There is a large paragraph in detail in the original list explaining that this data is not the basis of "falsification" but only lists the traffic changes in two days, please identify yourself.
And the more important information is below:
The list maker clearly told the reader that the data statistics time of this list was 12 noon on the 29th, that is, the next day.
Most of the students who disseminated this list did not have time to bring these explanations with them, and usually only showed the list to everyone.
In this way, what the onlookers see is not the "traffic decline list" containing rigorous explanations, but the "brush volume fraud list"
Wait a minute
Friends who are familiar with "scientific and technological aesthetics" know that in the past three years, we have published articles every day at 23:59, which means that the data in the list is the average reading volume of "scientific and technological aesthetics" 37,000 is counted in 12 hours, and this data is indeed no problem.
But I am personally accustomed to counting the average reading volume of an official account, which usually waits until 24 hours or 48 hours later. So what is the amount of reading of "technological aesthetics" after 24 hours?
Special note 28 released 1 article that is not usually involved: cars, and in the headlines, the overall decline in reading is actually expected.
The list counts 12 hours of reading and concludes
"Aesthetics of Science and Technology" on the 28th half day than the 27th full day the average reading volume decreased by 40%
After we counted the number of readings for 24 hours, we found.
"Aesthetics of Technology" on the 28th day decreased by 16% compared to the 27th all day, and the average reading volume dropped by 16%
Let's look at the data on the new list, which is similar to what we did, down about 15 percent.
In the picture above, the 23rd did not publish an article that day, not because the brushing tool failed that day, nor because it was asleep, but to participate in the Xiaomi 5s conference and make a Xiaomi 5s evaluation video. Later, we will draw a Xiaomi Mi 5s from WeChat users to send out.
Finally, to sum up, the original planned statistical time of the "fake brushing list" on the Internet was:
0:00 on the 28th – 12:00 on the 29th, including 36 hours of reading.
Many public accounts, including "Science and Technology Aesthetics", are due to the time of posting:
28th 23:59 - 29th 12:00, only 12 hours of reading.
Personally, I feel that the reading volume of "technological aesthetics" in 12 hours is 40% lower than the average reading volume of the past week is not normal, it should be 50% lower
Obviously, if it is those WeChat signals posted at 0 o'clock on the 28th, you can get the most statistical time. To our kind of public account that publishes articles every day in the middle of the night is more miserable.
I hope that more public accounts on the "fake brush list" can look at their own posting time. The original author's article leaves room for manoeuvre, with many explanations and explanations, but if you only look at the "list", it is obvious that the accounts on the "fake brush list" are fake.
Someone asked: Even if there is nothing wrong with your traffic all day on the 28th, maybe it is all brushed out?
Well, the amount of net legend brush is very easy, so I went to a treasure to search for it, and sure enough, it was very cheap, cheap, ah...
As long as a few hundred pieces are so easy to get 100,000+ readings? Then what do we work so WeChat every day, it's too stupid.
However, I heard that the amount of brush is easy to see, so I quickly asked a seller. The main question is not safe to brush the amount of security, will it be officially seen, will not collect money and do not brush the amount.
The owner didn't want to talk to me much and threw me a picture.
The boss said: We are professional brush volume, please do not question our ability and professional ethics
This boss is very crisp, said that he can brush, but the time is not guaranteed, just after the article to wait for a while to start brushing.
Oh, it seems that their brush volume is not omnipotent, come out to brush to be professional a little good, you so we brush up easy to show the stuffing ah.
Then come back and look at the brush volume characteristics of "technological aesthetics"
Take, for example, the article sent by "Aesthetics of Science" last night, which was sent at 23:59. There is a process of sending, after all the fans, it usually takes a few minutes, usually around 0:5 can be sent.
Note that within a few tens of minutes of just sending WeChat, those brushing tools are not used, so it is most intuitive to look at a WeChat signal brush without brushing data, just look at the data volume growth of the previous hour.
The reading volume in the upper left corner and the corresponding time in the lower right corner
The above is a screenshot of the data in the background of "technological aesthetics", but this screenshot may also be fake PS, so what to do?
Welcome to the public account of "Science and Technology Aesthetics" (WeChat kejimx), see how our reading volume changes every minute, and witness how we "brush volume".
How does "tech aesthetics" match up to loyal users?
Many users have left messages in the background saying, why don't you answer the questions we ask. There are also readers who leave messages every day, but they have never been selected, are you worthy of us loyal users?
Sorry to disappoint everyone
Let's take a look at the difference between us and some of the same suspected large brushes.
Some accounts have high reading and likes for articles, but comments have low or zero likes. It seems that something is wrong, and what is wrong, I don't know, everyone judges for themselves.
"Scientific and technological aesthetics" of the public number, the number of article likes is not too high, but the number of likes of reader comments is not bad, indicating that everyone is still discussing quite warmly, of course, each WeChat graphic text only has hundreds of thousands of messages, and those thousands of likes are still not comparable.
Here we have to say sorry to you again, because the public account background message can only show 50, recently upgraded to 100, so many people's messages every day can not let everyone see.
In the near future, we will do similar forum facilities in WeChat to let everyone's messages be displayed.
After this incident, we fully realized that it is a very inappropriate thing for "scientific and technological aesthetics" to send WeChat at 23:59 every day, when many people are sleeping, and the next morning everyone goes to see other people's WeChat articles, and various traffic statistics are also suffered.
Na Yan's last words every night are: Good night everyone, rest early.
Onlookers have said: every day at 12 o'clock to read the article, but also early rest a fart ah (lift the table)
(╯‵□′)╯︵┻━┻
After the "scientific aesthetics" brush volume counterfeit time. We have decided to advance the "Science and Technology Aesthetics" WeChat push time by 30 minutes to 23:30 from October 2, 2016, so that everyone can go to bed early!
Onlookers have expressed their gratitude for the counterfeit brushing incident! Finally able to go to bed early.
NAYAN: I'm talking about trying
Onlookers: Kill you as much as possible
Finally, something serious
First of all, I would like to thank Tencent for providing such a beautiful platform as WeChat, so that we can publish "technology aesthetics" articles in the middle of the night every day.
Second, thanks to Tencent for blocking the brush volume counterfeiting tool this time, so that more valuable WeChat accounts can get due respect.
Third thanks to the new list, there are very detailed statistics, so that everyone can objectively understand the WeChat traffic data.
Fourth, thanks to the author of the "traffic decline list", although the "scientific and technological aesthetics" has been scolded a lot, it also makes us pay more attention to traffic, and I only hope that the author will write the statistical time clearly in the future.
In addition we are recruiting female anchors and programmers
Featured recent articles:
Hammer T3/T3L unveiled, white body is really handsome!
Samsung issued a Note7 security statement, CCTV said no sincerity!
Baidu said that the US group is a rogue, what do you think?
BT Paradise Webmaster caught Next guess who it will be?
Xiaomi Mi 5s and Plus Reviews Compare One Plus 3 Fast Experience
Business cooperation [email protected]