During the Soviet-German War, Stalin forced Churchill to go to Moscow to explain the opening of the Second Front as early as possible by the Allies. But in 1944, when the Allies were preparing to carry out the landing operation in France to open a second battlefield, the contradiction of who would be the commander-in-chief of the Allied forces was placed in front of Churchill. Fortunately, Churchill would be very observant, and after meeting with US President Roosevelt, he very happily agreed to make Eisenhower commander-in-chief of the Allied European Theater of Operations. So, Eisenhower is not in the front of the list in terms of qualifications or military achievements, what ability does he have to take on this important position?
<h1 class= "pgc-h-arrow-right" > experience is more important than experience, and planning is more important than implementation. Although Eisenhower came to the top, he had connections and the ability to grasp the big picture that others could not match</h1>
In the workplace, company owners are accustomed to valuing experience and experience and placing diplomas on the back burner. On the battlefield, too, Eisenhower's success as Allied commander-in-chief had an important bearing on his rich experience.
First of all, Eisenhower always had noble people to help him throughout his life. While studying, he met his good friend Hazellet, and with his encouragement, he was admitted to the Military Academy at West Point and went on to pursue a career in the military. In 1922, he was transferred to the hands of Major General Connor, where he mainly collected information on the European theater of World War I, and was appreciated by General Pershing. In 1933, he served as MacArthur's internal staff officer to learn more about the Pacific Theater. These connections and rich experience paved the way for him to advance.
Second, after the outbreak of World War II, Eisenhower's excellent staff work experience was valued by Marshall, and he became the first person in the United States to grasp the situation in the European theater. After the outbreak of World War II, the US military needed to grasp the war situation in the European theater and the Soviet-German battlefield, because Eisenhower was responsible for collecting European intelligence more than a decade ago, this advantage made him a fish in the water, quickly entered the situation.
Third, the U.S. landings in North Africa and the Allied landings in Sicily both demonstrated Eisenhower's command skills and accumulated experience for the Normandy landings. On November 8, 1942, Eisenhower commanded U.S. troops to land in North Africa, his first command of operations, and he succeeded. Immediately after that, on July 9, 1943, he successfully commanded the United States, Britain, France and Canada to land in Sicily, fully demonstrating his command ability and excellent coordination ability to the world.
Therefore, with experience and experience, and most importantly, having already commanded the Allies, it seemed natural for Eisenhower to serve as commander of the Allied forces in the European Theater.
<h1 class= "pgc-h-arrow-right" > strength is more important than slogans, and winning is more important than status. The Normandy landings, the U.S. army dominated the force, although the British army was the home battle, Churchill showed super tolerance and courage, becoming a strong backing for Eisenhower</h1>
Although Eisenhower was 82 days away from the Normandy landings on orders from the Allied commander-in-chief, he was also underwhelmed. In front of him, several thorny issues lay in front of him. The first is the question of the commander. The main combat force for the Normandy landings was the Americans, followed by the British. But montgomery, the commander of the British army, was in full swing because he defeated Rommel in North Africa, and Montgomery was slightly better than him in terms of seniority and military achievements.
Another problem is the landing operation, the command and coordination of the army, navy and air force, especially the large number of landing troops, close to 2.8 million people, in Churchill's words, this is the largest command operation, the power and responsibility is also large.
But Eisenhower was very good at taking advantage of his staff background, and he went out of his way to report military information to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in order to win his support. This move made Churchill very happy and appreciative, in Churchill's heart, there is such an American general willing to communicate with him, it is also good to grasp the whole war situation, from Eisenhower to get first-hand information is much faster than the British report, why not enjoy it?
Looking at the Normandy landings, Churchill's support for Eisenhower was unprecedented and unique. Churchill once told him in person that if the landing failed, not only would it be Eisenhower who would suffer the loss, but he himself would also be prepared to step down. When Eisenhower proposed that the British Air Force should also be placed under his unified control, he was opposed by the British Strategic Air Force Commander Harris, who sought help from Churchill.
As far as Churchill is concerned, the US military can cross the ocean to come to Britain, but also to liberate Europe, the British army can also make some sacrifices, it is Churchill's generosity that made him more praise than Roosevelt after the war.
<h1 class = "pgc-h-arrow-right" > character is more important than ability, and the mind is more important than battle achievements. Eisenhower was on a peril, and although Montgomery and de Gaulle were skeptical of him, he gave a satisfactory answer with a landing victory</h1>
As we all know, many of the U.S. generals who participated in World War II were world celebrities, MacArthur, Patton, Bradley, Nimitz, etc., and only Eisenhower was re-elected as president for two consecutive terms. Is he more capable and skilled than other generals? Neither. His success lies in his character and mind.
In "The Great Storm of Normandy", there are two scenes where when Montgomery learns that Eisenhower is commander-in-chief of the Allied forces, he runs to Churchill and questions why he didn't let him be the head? When Montgomery arrogantly came to the Allied command, Eisenhower showed a very modest but unassuming demeanor, and on various occasions he was very respectful of letting Montgomery express his opinion first, a kind of mentality that ordinary people could not do.
Another shot is that Britain, Canada, and other European countries were willing to work with the Allies to fight the Germans, but de Gaulle was not optimistic about the Allied landings because of Eisenhower's disagreement over the Handling of the Vichy regime in France and de Gaulle. When the two of them met, de Gaulle also arrogantly threw him aside, and also pointed out to his face that the Overlord plan would not succeed. Eisenhower patiently explained the result, and then solemnly stated that even if the Free French Front did not support it, the Allies would liberate France.
If the above two examples are differences in personal political opinions, then Eisenhower delayed the landing time again and again because of weather problems in order to sacrifice a few few soldiers, and did not finally issue orders until a few hours before the landing. And when it was predicted that the paratroopers parachuted in behind enemy lines might lose seventy percent, Eisenhower personally rushed to the place of departure to say goodbye to them one by one, and even the soldiers did not believe that a supreme general with 2.8 million men would come to send them off. Eventually, when the casualty rate of Allied soldiers landing in the airborne ground was less than 20%, Eisenhower breathed a sigh of relief.
From Eisenhower, we seem to learn a lot, not necessarily to be very ostentatious, but very much need wisdom; to do things do not have to be comprehensive, but need to be refined.
For more information, please pay attention to what the island owner said, and readers who like this article should like, collect and share it!
#pgc-card .pgc-card-href { text-decoration: none; outline: none; display: block; width: 100%; height: 100%; } #pgc-card .pgc-card-href:hover { text-decoration: none; } /*pc 样式*/ .pgc-card { box-sizing: border-box; height: 164px; border: 1px solid #e8e8e8; position: relative; padding: 20px 94px 12px 180px; overflow: hidden; } .pgc-card::after { content: " "; display: block; border-left: 1px solid #e8e8e8; height: 120px; position: absolute; right: 76px; top: 20px; } .pgc-cover { position: absolute; width: 162px; height: 162px; top: 0; left: 0; background-size: cover; } .pgc-content { overflow: hidden; position: relative; top: 50%; -webkit-transform: translateY(-50%); transform: translateY(-50%); } .pgc-content-title { font-size: 18px; color: #222; line-height: 1; font-weight: bold; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap; } .pgc-content-desc { font-size: 14px; color: #444; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; padding-top: 9px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 1.2em; display: -webkit-inline-box; -webkit-line-clamp: 2; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; } .pgc-content-price { font-size: 22px; color: #f85959; padding-top: 18px; line-height: 1em; } .pgc-card-buy { width: 75px; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 50px; color: #406599; font-size: 14px; text-align: center; } .pgc-buy-text { padding-top: 10px; } .pgc-icon-buy { height: 23px; width: 20px; display: inline-block; background: url(https://lf1-cdn-tos.bytescm.com/obj/cdn-static-resource/pgc/v2/pgc_tpl/static/image/commodity_buy_f2b4d1a.png); }
Genuine World War II those things comic book full set (1 + 2 war legend + 3 land and sea battle) Huang classmate comics World War II history history history reading primary school students extracurricular reading world war TWO those things world war II full history comic book picture book ¥38 purchase
References: The Complete History of World War II, The Storm of World War II, The Great Storm of Normandy
Wonderful recommendation: During the Soviet-Finnish War, the Soviet army wanted to use the new T-34 tank for testing, why did it not achieve it?
In the Soviet-German War, why did the Soviet Army establish the Guards? Who is more effective than the German SS
The Allied landings in Normandy in World War II, why Rommel was not confident, there was a group of soldiers under his command