After Iran's retaliation, Israel is even more crazy! The follow-up may lead to greater conflicts!

On July 31 this year, Hamas's Politburo leader Haniyeh suffered a tragedy in Tehran, the capital of Iran, and the news of his death spread rapidly, instantly igniting the already volatile Middle East situation. This sudden turn of events not only deepened the hatred of Hamas and Iran against Israel, but also drew United States into this complex regional dispute. At that time, Hamas and Iran directly accused Israel of being behind it, revealed the shadow of the United States government behind it, and vowed to make Israel pay a heavy price.

Time passed quietly, but the flame of revenge was not extinguished. As we celebrate the National Day holiday, the skies of the Middle East are once again red by the flames of war. On October 1, Iran finally retaliated by pouring an unprecedented "missile rain" on Israel.

Iran claimed that 200 missiles pierced the sky like sharp swords and aimed directly at three major military bases around Tel Aviv in Israel. The IRGC also announced that its missiles accurately hit Israel's military strategic points, including air force and radar bases, and that even in the face of Israel's most advanced defense systems, the missile's missiles still hit 90 percent. At the same time, Iran warned Israel not to act rashly, or face devastating consequences. Israel, for its part, tried to downplay the impact of the attack, claiming that 90 percent of the missiles were successfully intercepted.

It is worth noting that Iran showed a high degree of restraint and precision in this attack. Instead of indiscriminately attacking civilians, they targeted Israel's military installations. This strategy not only reduces civilian casualties, but also highlights Iran's calmness and determination in military operations.

Israel's actions, by contrast, appear cruel and unjustified. On the same night as Iran launched the attack, Israeli ground forces carried out a brutal massacre of the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis, killing at least 32 innocent people. This act once again exposes Israel's double standards and moral degradation in its treatment of civilians.

In addition, looking at Iran's retaliation this time, many people have questioned: First, if Iran really wants to be ruthless, why not choose to act in the direction of the Golan Heights to further increase the effectiveness of retaliation? Second, why did Iran immediately emphasize that it had no intention of starting a war after retaliation, which is quite a bit of a stop, and is this a show and deliberately creating a fake revenge?

In fact, Iran's retaliation against Israel is by no means a bluff. Behind this is the delicate balance and profound consideration of Iran in the complex geopolitical landscape.

First, Iran's failure to escalate the conflict in the Golan Heights is not a matter of inadequacy, but a deliberate strategic choice. The Golan Heights are a sensitive zone, and any aggressive action could trigger the trigger for a full-scale war, something Iran does not want to afford. Iran is well aware that once a full-scale war breaks out, it will not only be mired in a quagmire, but also more likely to attract the full suppression of the US-Israel alliance and endanger the foundation of national security. Moreover, Iran does not want to risk itself and use itself as a detonator to detonate a full-scale war. Therefore, Iran's retaliation, although fierce, has always maintained a "limited" restraint, aimed at deterring Israel while preventing the situation from spiraling out of control.

Second, the rapid cooling of Iran's retaliation is not a show, but a clear signal to the international community: Iran has no intention of provoking a full-scale war, but its determination to defend its national interests is unshakable. This strategy not only demonstrates Iran's tough posture, but also gains more diplomatic space and public opinion support in the international arena. In fact, Iran has signaled through diplomatic channels before retaliating, and it is likely that it has carried out necessary communication with United States and other major powers to ensure the "controllability" of its actions. United States' early warning and preparedness are clear evidence of the subtle interaction between the two sides.

In addition, Iran's retaliation is not only a response to Israel's provocations, but also closely related to its domestic politics. Against the backdrop of growing domestic challenges, the Iranian government urgently needs external actions to unite the people and demonstrate the determination and strategic vision of the leadership. So this is a political declaration to the Iranian people, aiming to strengthen domestic unity and enhance the prestige of the government.

Therefore, there can be no doubt that Iran's retaliation against Israel was a well-planned "real retaliation."

Regarding Iran's actions, the statements of various countries are also quite meaningful.

United States President Joe Biden quickly stated that on the surface he was a firm supporter of Israel, but in fact he was another rash step into the complex situation in the Middle East. He said he had instructed the U.S. military to "actively support Israel's defenses" and downplay the effectiveness of Iran's attacks, a political and diplomatic routine that could hardly conceal the underlying intention behind it — to further engage in the Middle East. Harris's rhetoric is even more vivid in the United States's partiality, and her unwavering support for Israel is almost blind, while turning a blind eye to the suffering of the Palestinian people. European Commission Vice President Josep Borrell condemned Iran in the strongest terms. He posted at X: "A dangerous cycle of revenge runs the risk of getting out of control. An immediate ceasefire is needed in the Middle East. "Such empty appeals will do little to ease tensions in the Middle East.

However, regardless of the international community's statement, the missile attack by Iran is undoubtedly a powerful challenge to Israel and United States' Middle East policy. It proves that Israel's air defense system is not impregnable and exposes Israel's vulnerability in strategic depth. And with the tacit approval of Iraq, the only way for Iran's missiles and armed drones, Israel's situation is even worse.

Although Israel has released cruel words, according to CCTV News on October 3, local time on October 2, an anonymous Israel official revealed to the media that Israel will carry out major retaliatory actions against Iran in the next few days. But in any case, Iran's actions are likely to usher in new changes in the Middle East.

Iran's counterattack is not only a military operation, but also a catharsis of popular emotions. In the aftermath of the retaliation, both Sunnis and Shiites, people poured into the streets to celebrate the long-lost voice of justice, as if they had finally vented the evil breath that had been stored in their chests for a long time. Inside Iran, state television broadcasts shocking images of missiles piercing Israel's night sky against the backdrop of a rousing melody, announcing a prelude to revenge. And the street celebrations in Tehran, Mashhad and other cities have pushed this sentiment to a climax. Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank of the Jordan even posed for photos with missile fragments to remember this rare moment of "victory......

It is Israel's insatiable greed and bloody brutality that are uniting the Middle East region. If the Arab countries can overcome the problems of organizational capacity, weaponry, and the quality of the troops and build a united front, then Israel will face unprecedented challenges. And United States, as a staunch supporter of Israel, will also have to be involved in this "black hole".

In short, Iran's counterattack, while militarily ineffective, has dealt a blow to Israel's arrogance in the Middle East. United States should also understand that it is not invincible, and once the Middle East is reshuffled, Israel's future living space will face great uncertainty.

In this world of crisis and insecurity, the strengthening of national strength and a strong army are important guarantees for maintaining the security of the people. Without the support of these forces, we would still want to celebrate the National Day and enjoy a peaceful life, which would be a luxury. Therefore, we should cherish the existing peace and stability, while at the same time being wary of those forces that seek to destabilize the situation.