Focusing on domestic football events, a unique perspective interpretation.
Be fair to state the point of view of the matter.
Please click to follow and wander the rivers and lakes together
As we all know, in the last round of the Chinese Super League, the impact of the Beijing-Shanghai battle was very large, not only Shanghai Shenhua lost the game and lost 3 points, and the points gap with Shanghai Port came to 5 points, but also the outside world compared the two offside penalties in the game of extensive attention and discussion.
We know that in this game, two key offside penalties directly affected the trend of the game, especially in the stoppage time of the game, Beijing Guoan Wang Ziming's stunner, which is likely to make Shanghai Shenhua's efforts this season come to naught.
Therefore, after the game, the outside media made an statement, and Shanghai Shenhua appealed the two key offside decisions in this game.
Just today, the referee review of the Football Association has the latest results, Shanghai Shenhua's appeal is invalid, and the game is not unjust.
According to the evaluation report of the referee of the Football Association, we learned that in the 16th review of this season, the two key offside decisions of Beijing Guoan and Shanghai Shenhua were mainly reviewed and analyzed.
In the end, the review panel found that both decisions were correct, but VAR made a mistake in the selection of the second-to-last individual court when judging the offside position.
According to the announcement, we are aware that this review was conducted in the form of a video conference, and two football supervisors from the media and society and the discipline inspectors of the Football Association were invited to attend the meeting.
In the first case of suspected offside, in the 48th minute of the game, Shanghai Shenhua No. 9 player scored, and the referee on duty initially ruled that the goal was valid, but after the prompt of VAR, the No. 9 was changed to offside first, and the goal was invalid.
Loading...
Loading...
In the review announcement, the correct operation after VAR intervention was further elaborated, so there was no objection to the decision.
For the second case of suspected offside decision, in the 97th minute of the game, Beijing Guoan 20 players scored, and the referee on duty initially ruled that the goal was valid, but VAR did not intervene after checking it, and the goal was judged to be valid.
The review announcement also clearly made further instructions, believing that the VAR viewing behavior is no different from the first suspected offside view, and after 3D marking, it is judged that the effective parts of the body of the attacking and defending players are almost equal to the defender's threshold, that is, almost parallel.
Loading...
Loading...
And after the 3D line confirmation, there is no gap between the two sides, almost overlapping, according to the unified penalty scale of the Chinese Super League, this time it is not an offside behavior, so it is consistent with the initial penalty of the referee on duty. No VAR involvement is required.
Subsequently, the announcement again gave a detailed interpretation of the second suspected offside penalty.
said that in the reconsideration after the review, it was believed that the VAR on duty made a mistake in selecting the defending player when drawing the line, and the No. 4 player who was closer to the defender's goal should be selected as the basis, so that it showed that the No. 20 player of Beijing Guoan was obviously not in an offside position and there was no foul.
This kind of review announcement is concise and clear, and the review process is clearly introduced, which is very friendly to fans from the outside world.
Loading...
Moreover, such measures have appeared frequently this season, reflecting the Football Association's desire to take every controversial decision seriously, so that the outside world can recognize and understand the situation at the time.
Moreover, the Football Association's review is not just from the referee's point of view, in many reviews, the Football Association has announced the mistakes of the referee on duty, and it is also the first time in many years that the Football Association has admitted that there was a mistake in the penalty and made it public.
It's just that such a move has a good intention, but after the translation, it does not have much impact on the outcome of the game, and even the referee who made the wrong judgment has little impact, so this system is more to block the mouth of outside fans.
I hope that in the future, the Football Association can introduce some fair and just measures more perfectly.
Image source: Internet
Disclaimer: The above content only represents the personal views of Jiulou West. The ninth floor west strives to be true and complete in content, and has a clear point of view. If there are other sources, but the official announcement of the true situation shall prevail. Jiulou West is not legally responsible for the consequences arising from the use of the above articles. The final interpretation right of the article belongs to Jiulou West.