In 1947, the United Nations passed a resolution to establish two states in Palestine, one Arab and one Jewish, each occupying 45% and 55% of the territory.
The reason for the establishment of the union through Israel is that there is a problem of manipulation by the United States, and this issue will not be discussed for the time being. But there is a "common knowledge" historical basis for the fact that the Jews had established a state in Palestine, only to be driven out by the Romans.
The question is: Is the historical basis for Israel's statehood in Palestine credible? Surprisingly, modern archaeology overturns traditional perceptions, and yet another Jewish lie has been exposed.
The fictional book of Joshua
After Moses fled Egypt, he wandered in the wilderness for more than 40 years before coming to the east bank of the Jordan River. Next, Joshua led the Israelites across the river to the Canaan region of the West Bank, which is now known as Palestine. Below, Moses splits the Red Sea.
The book of Joshua in the Bible records that Joshua slaughtered 34 Canaanite cities, and "exterminated all the people in the city, young and old", and even "killed all the cattle with the sword", thus laying a foundation and gaining a foothold in Canaan.
Since the history of Israel or the Jews is largely derived from the Bible, the book of Joshua became an important historical basis for Israel's occupation of Canaan after its exit from Egypt.
So, is the book of Joshua credible? The answer given by archaeology is subversive - the book of Joshua is fiction!
In the book of Joshua, a total of thirty-four cities have been conquered or destroyed, but only three or four have been found to be clearly destroyed. At the same time, it is uncertain whether these "cities with obvious signs of destruction" were the work of Joshua and the Israelites.
Thus, the contents of the book of Joshua have been falsified by archaeology and the lies have been exposed!
The book of Joshua was falsified, washing away Joshua's brutality, but denying the authenticity of the book of Joshua! Since the book of Joshua is fictional, then this part of Israel's history is naturally false, so can the history of Israel's occupation of Canaan be credible?
In fact, not only the book of Joshua, but also more than 40 sites recorded in the Bible as having taken place, the American archaeologist William Deaver found that only two or three sites showed signs of destruction in the late 13th century BC.
It can be seen that not only the book of Joshua, but also much of the Bible may be fictional. So, can the history of Israel based on the Bible still be believed?
In short, the biblical history of Israel is clearly not credible, and there is reason to suspect that the Israelis may not have established a state in Palestine at all.
It should be noted that the Bible is one of the key documents in the history of West Asia and Egypt constructed by the West, and once there are problems with this book, there will be problems with cuneiform and ancient Egyptian scripts.
The Western narrative of the double standard
According to the biblical narrative, in the 13th century B.C.E., Joshua destroyed several nations and conquered the region of Canaan. But the strange thing that happened here is that the Israelites did not establish a state immediately, but waited until about the 10th century B.C. to establish the United Kingdom of Israel, which soon split into the kingdom of Israel in the north and the kingdom of Judah in the south.
In the process of human civilization, the "emergence of the state" is certainly one of the important symbols of civilization. But in Western narratives, for example, the American scholar Albright argues that Joshua's massacre of Canaan is an inevitable and historically necessary measure for a higher civilization to a lower civilization.
In fact, from the perspective of "state", the Israelis at that time may have been "barbarians".
More importantly, since the Bible says that Israel established a state in Canaan, should the West's serious and rigorous research on Chinese history (such as the Xia Dynasty) be unearthed?
Needless to say, we can't be lenient with ourselves and strict with others, and the standards must be the same!
But in fact, there is no "literal evidence" or "self-proof" archaeological evidence that can prove the existence of the United Kingdom of Israel, the Kingdom of Israel, and the Kingdom of Judah.
In other words, there is no ironclad historical evidence for the founding of modern Israel, but only a Bible that tells the world "one thing in a serious way": Canaan is Jehovah's promised land to Israel!
But the problem is, in the Book of Songs, it is said that "under the whole world, it is not the king's land, and the shore of the land is not the king's minister", and the Han book says that "everything that the sun and the moon shine on, and where the rivers go, it is the Han land", according to the logic of Israel, is it not that the entire earth is Chinese?
In short, the historical basis for Israel's establishment of a state in Palestine is either not credible documentary evidence or there is no archaeological evidence, and it is simply "you have to believe what I say".
In fact, even the belief that Israel established a kingdom in Canaan does not serve as a basis for modern statehood, because ancient Israel were colonizers, not the natives of Canaan. Of course, the West will not deny the basis for Israel's founding on this point, because Britain, France, and the United States are all colonial countries, and to deny Israel is to deny itself.