Sanyuanli's "power ban" initiative has caused controversy from all walks of life, with many people supporting it and some people holding different opinions. However, it has been proven that we need to face up to the problems caused by electric bicycles and strive to find a balance.
Looking back on last year, Judge Chen Haiyi in Guangzhou had pointed out the problem of electric bicycles and put forward solutions to it, but unfortunately it was not taken seriously at that time, and netizens still had many misunderstandings. Now that Sanyuanli has taken action, we can't help but wonder whether Judge Chan was justified in what he said in the first place. Do we need to give Judge Chan a sincere apology for this?
Electric bicycles have indeed brought a lot of convenience to urban transportation, but the accompanying parking difficulties and safety hazards are increasing day by day. In recent years, fire accidents have continued to occur, and many electric bicycle fires in Beijing, Nanjing and other cities have caused great losses to communities and citizens.
And with the explosion of numbers, any neighborhood and roadside is full of parked electric vehicles, which is really difficult to walk. This is contrary to the propaganda of "green travel" of electric vehicles themselves. As early as a year ago, Judge Chan pointed out that the number of e-bikes is too large to manage.
She called for limiting production capacity, controlling quantity, and forming a complete set of management norms to balance the convenience and safety of electric vehicles. But at the time, many people did not pay attention to this argument, but questioned her "lack of practical experience". Nowadays, with the "power ban" in Sanyuanli, all sectors of society have faced up to this problem and have begun to realize the seriousness of the excessive number of electric vehicles.
Sanyuanli conveys a clear message with practical actions: electric vehicles must be effectively managed, and failure to manage will bring potential safety hazards. Limiting production capacity and volume growth is exactly what Judge Chen wisely pointed out as early as a year ago. It's a pity that many people didn't really listen to it at that time, otherwise it might be possible to take effective measures to alleviate the current situation as soon as possible. Sanyuanli's decision has opened the curtain for us to think about, and it also proves that what Judge Chen said at the beginning was not entirely unreasonable.
So, at this time, should we give Judge Chen a sincere apology for this? Of course, we should not blame her skepticers too much, because the complexity of the issue will take time to be revealed. And each of us citizens should learn from this, stop making arbitrary judgments, and consider different points of view. In the face of any social problem, we need to think with an open and unified attitude and test it with action, rather than easily denying it on the pretext that we have no experience.
Looking back at Sanyuanli's "power ban" initiative and Judge Chen's original advice, we can't help but ponder: is the reason why electric bicycles have become a problem precisely because we have collectively ignored and lost control of the potential crisis behind them? How to ensure the convenience of use at the same time, but also give users a safe grasp of the space, will be a system engineering needs to be considered by every citizen. Considering the views of others and examining oneself with an open mind is also the fundamental way to deal with any social problem.
In short, the measures taken by Sanyuanli have shown us the seriousness of the electric vehicle problem, and we are even more moved to express our sincere apologies to Judge Chan for this. We hope that through this experience, all sectors will be able to take a more pragmatic and responsible approach to various social issues, and strive to find a balance between the issues and bring practical development solutions to the city. Only by listening to each other can we build a more harmonious and prosperous society together!