In the absence of evidence, the U.S. government sanctioned and suppressed Huawei on the grounds of endangering U.S. national security.
Regardless of the outcome, I strongly support Huawei's use of legal means to defend its interests. At a time when the U.S. government is violating the puritanical spirit of the founding fathers, Huawei's approach has also made Chinese companies more convinced of the power of the law.
At the bottom of commerce is a stable and solid order composed of civilization and law. On the basis of order, business can create wealth stably.
A few days ago, Guo Ping, Huawei's rotating chairman, issued a sonorous and powerful voice to the world at its headquarters in Shenzhen: challenging the U.S. government for whether Article 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act issued by the U.S. government is unconstitutional.
On May 16, 2019, we woke up in the morning to see a piece of news that shocked the world: Trump signed an executive order to sanction Huawei on the grounds that it threatens U.S. national security.
This is a trick by Trump and an excuse for some interest groups in the United States, but this botched performance has caused great harm to Huawei.
Since then, Huawei and its subsidiaries have been included in the Entity List for Export Control by the United States, and the design and import of high-end chips for mobile phones have been directly stifled.
As of last year, in the four years of suffering, Huawei's mobile phones have almost disappeared.
This has caused huge losses to Huawei's management: Huawei, which lacks mobile phone business, has seen its profits plummet and even has to sell the Honor brand.
But five years have passed, and the U.S. government has not produced effective evidence that Huawei endangers U.S. national security.
Is the U.S. government too inefficient? Or is the U.S. security detection technology not good?
The truth of the matter is that Huawei's communications equipment simply does not have the backdoor claimed by the United States, and it does no harm to the national security of the United States at all.
Continued to crack down on a Chinese technology company on trumped-up charges. Is the U.S. government really concerned about the safety of the American people? Or is it the U.S. government, for some other purpose?
With 37 years of growth, Huawei has become an international company, and the premise of becoming an international company is to constantly adapt to the local market.
How could Huawei, which does global business, not know the importance of complying with local laws?
The development and growth of an enterprise is a process of life and death from non-standard to standardized.
If it had only relied on rogue methods, would Huawei have come so far? Is this looking down on hooligans or looking down on Huawei?
Huawei certainly has its own shortcomings, but Huawei also has a lot to offer. What is the difference between looking at Huawei in black and white and suppressing Huawei by the U.S. government?
There is also a huge controversy in the U.S. legal community over the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act promulgated by the U.S. government.
The U.S. sanctions against Huawei are the result of a ruling by the U.S. Congress and do not allow U.S. executive agencies and U.S. courts to adjudicate any such allegations against Huawei.
Congress has no jurisdiction, but Congress is directly working in the face of Huawei, does the US Congress violate US law?
What is the purpose of the U.S. Congress's aggressive and violent targeting of a Chinese technology company?
Can the U.S. Congress really represent the true interests of all the American people? Or is it an ulterior motive?
In response to these facts, Huawei's international legal team sued the U.S. government for violating the U.S. Constitution.
The progress of science and technology is beneficial to all mankind, and the people of any country have the right to enjoy better scientific and technological products and services.
Common sense that kindergarten children know: to speak, you need to talk about evidence.
The U.S. government shouts and kills Huawei all day long, and at every turn, Huawei endangers U.S. national security and Huawei engages in espionage, what about the evidence?
Regardless of who wins or loses the lawsuit, Huawei's lawsuit against the U.S. government provides us with a valuable opportunity to observe the level of rule of law in the U.S. up close.
If the U.S. government and Congress still can't produce evidence to prove that Huawei has violated the law, and still suppress Huawei on trumped-up charges, then the rule of law in the United States is a big historical joke.
Americans long for a life of stability, prosperity and happiness, and Chinese certainly want to live such a life.
Is it against the spirit of the United States to suppress China's science and technology in the name of security?
If the rulers of a country tear down the foundation stones of their own statehood, the country will only become more and more degenerate.
I hope the United States can give Huawei a fair, just, open and transparent answer!