What a car needs is a durability test, not a car score.
There is a very strange and unreasonable phenomenon in the mobile phone circle, and the "running score system" that is not directly related to the sense of use experience appears, which transmits an important hint signal to outsiders when choosing mobile phones:
Whoever has a high score in the mobile phone will have a strong performance.
Indeed, the running score can reflect part of the performance of the product, but whether it is good or not depends on the heating, battery life, charging, feel, stability, system optimization, fluency, etc.
A really good mobile phone never looks at the running score, and the pursuit of running score in a simple sense has no meaning.
Ranking the running score of the car's car machine system seems harmless, but in fact, it will also pull a large number of user groups into a misunderstanding: whoever has a higher running score is a good car.
Not everyone understands cars, and the reason why the needs of young consumers to buy cars will change is that companies are leading.
As a car, the important points should lie in the solidity and rationality of the body-in-white, the stability and durability of the quality of a car, the detailed performance and comfort of the vehicle design, the handling performance of the chassis, and the toughness of the steering feel.
None of this will be shown by a running score.
In addition, what electric vehicles should consider is not the charging speed and charging power, but whether they have the same charging speed and battery capacity as new cars after 3 or 4 years.
But these cannot be presented simply by relying on a car-machine scoring system.
The car machine system has indeed become a point that many young consumers look at when consuming, but for a car, the value of the car machine system should be ranked last.
Whether the car machine system is smooth or not is not so important, over-reliance on the car machine system, the later performance of the vehicle will be reflected by the stuck car machine system.
The characteristic of electronic products is that color, smoothness, and speed will be greatly affected over time, so put the running score system on the car and watch it for fun.
Taking a step back, the large central control screen of a car is more of a Pad tablet to display basic entertainment information, and some models are implanted with functional buttons.
But more work is done every day, and more important than the in-vehicle system is suspension, steering, crash safety, comfort, seats, reliability, and so on.
Putting this kind of rather low-level marketing thinking in the technology circle in the automotive circle must first be corrected, which is basically not of much use.
If there is a quality problem with a mobile phone, the most you can sell it will be. However, if there is a quality problem with a car, it is related to personal safety, and the cost of selling it is too high.
Therefore, we have been saying that we must choose mature, reliable, and market-proven products to ensure the maximum budget in hand, and indeed the current domestic passenger car market has been injected with the gene of science and technology, but as a car, the core will not change at all.
First of all, it should be reliable, durable, safe and comfortable, and secondly, it should be the expressiveness of the vehicle system and intelligence.
The smoky miasma of the science and technology circle, since it has blown to the car circle, there should be a new cognition, no matter how high the running score is, it only has a certain advantage in the "car machine Pad".
Whether the "car machine Pad" is fast or not is not necessarily related to whether it is a good car, this is just a way and a means of marketing by new forces.