A dashcam video showed the private car and a police car driving almost side-by-side on the highway, with trucks in front of both sides. At this time, the police car in the right lane has a tendency to change lanes to the left lane, but the distance between the two vehicles is close.
Anyone who drives should know that this kind of distance, and it is at high speed, it is impossible for a normal person to change lanes, because your car butt is almost against the front of the other party's car.
At this time, there are two ways for private cars to deal with it, one is to accelerate over the large truck in front; The second is to step on the brakes and let the police car next to it turn around and go first.
The private car accelerated past the truck in front of it, then changed lanes to the right, giving way to the left lane to the police car. However, this behaviour had already angered the police car, which sounded its siren to speed up and force the private car to stop that had changed to the right lane.
Let's look at the picture below, it's not too much to say "force to stop", right?
The next step was when the police car pulled up to the emergency lane in front of the private car, and two men who were not wearing police uniforms got out of the car and asked the private car "why it didn't give way to the official car" and said that the private car had a "dangerous car" behavior, and asked him to show his driver's license.
It's just laughing to death, who is driving dangerously?
Even if it comes to "making way for official cars", it should be an official car during official duty, right? And the two men in this police car did not even wear the most basic "police uniform".
Driving a bus without a police uniform?
According to the "People's Police Law", the two of them have already violated the law. Because the traffic police must wear police uniforms according to the regulations when performing official duties, it is at least an administrative violation.
In addition, it is obvious in the video that the police car is not honking its horn until it wants to change lanes. It is after the private car does not apply the brakes to give way, and then starts honking and forcing the other party to stop.
The law does stipulate that "when a police car is performing an emergency mission, other vehicles shall give way", but a police car that does not honk its horn or wear a police uniform is also performing an emergency mission? If the task is so urgent, why not take the emergency lane at that time?
So I'm curious, what's wrong with a private car that is not breaking the law to be stopped on the highway? If something happens to this accident, it is an unbearable burden of life, who will be responsible? Who can afford that?
People are not stupid, there must be a reasonable reason for all kinds of unreasonableness, obviously, this is a kind of revenge for the private car did not give way to themselves, a kind of official authority, a kind of display of power.
If you don't give way to me, I'll trouble you. As soon as the documents are taken out, do you dare not cooperate?
The two policemen may have felt that their majesty had been provoked or offended. But in fact, they "misunderstood" the private car, and the private car "took the initiative to accelerate and divert to the right", isn't it also courtesy? Otherwise, why would it take the initiative to change to the slow lane? And speeding up through re-avoidance was actually the most correct way to do it in the scene at that time.
That's on the high speed, if there is a car behind, how to avoid the risk of rear-end collision caused by sudden deceleration?
Any driver can tell who is right and who is wrong, who is reasonable and who is not, who is legal and who is illegal, and there is no room for argument at all. The only thing worth mentioning is that the police car is terrifying in the way it wields its power.
This is not disguised, and it completely proves the sentence in "Nine Sesame Officials", which is "Nine Grades" and "such a great official authority".