Summary:
This paper explores the impact of Frusel's media theory on the relationship between technological images and human beings. First, Luxel's main points of view are introduced, including the importance of media in society, the reconstruction of human identity and cognition by media, and the complex impact of media on individuals and society. Secondly, Frusel's theories of posthumanism and neohumanism are analyzed, and the coping strategies of individuals and societies in the era of technological images are discussed.
I. Introduction
With the rapid development of technology and the advent of the digital age, technical images have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. From photos and videos on social media to advertisements, news reports, and artwork, technological imagery is everywhere that influences the way we think, socialize, and pass on culture. However, the in-depth understanding and analysis of technical images is relatively inadequate, especially in terms of their profound impact on human relationships and social structures.
This research aims to explore Vilém Flusser's media theory to dissect the complex interactions between technological images and human relationships. As an interdisciplinary thinker, Frusel has a unique perspective on technological images and their role in the information society, and his theories have not only had a profound impact on the fields of communication studies and cultural studies, but also provided important ways to think about contemporary social and cultural issues.
II. Theoretical Construction of Technical Images
A. Definition and origin of the concept of technical imagery
As one of the core concepts of Froussel's media theory, the definition and origin of technical image are important prerequisites for understanding Freund's view. A technical image is not simply a reference to an image or photograph in the digital age, but a form of representation with a specific historical context and social context. In Frusel's view, technical images are produced through technological devices, including cameras, televisions, computers, etc., which act as intermediaries to transform the real world into images and present the images to the photographer or viewer.
The origins of the technical image can be traced back to the invention of photography. In the mid-19th century, the advent of photography revolutionized the way people understand and express images. Photography not only makes the production process of images more convenient and faster, but also changes the way people perceive and perceive the real world. With the continuous development and popularization of photography technology, technical images have gradually penetrated into all aspects of human life and become an important tool for people to record, disseminate and express information.
B. The triadic structure of Freund's photographic theory: installation, image, photographer
Flusail summarizes the process of generating technical images as the interaction of the three elements of installation, image and photographer. The first is the technological device, which includes a series of tools and equipment for the production and dissemination of images, such as cameras, television cameras, computers, etc. These installations use specific technical means to transform real-world scenes into images and present them to the photographer or viewer.
The second is the image itself, which is a visual representation of the real world generated by a technological device. Technical images do not directly reflect reality, but are presented after processing and processing by technical devices, which have a certain selectivity and subjectivity. Therefore, the image does not exist objectively, but is a subjective construction and expression, and its meaning and value depend on the viewer's interpretation and understanding.
Finally, there are the photographers or viewers, who are the consumers and interpreters of technical images. The photographer creates an image through the use of technological devices, while the viewer obtains information and expresses an opinion by viewing, interpreting, and disseminating the image. The presence and behavior of photographers and viewers not only affect the production and dissemination of technical images, but also shape the meaning and influence of images. Therefore, the significance of a technical image lies not only in its visual effect on the surface, but also in its interaction with the photographer and the viewer.
C. Analysis of the relationship between technological images and the information society
There is a close relationship between technological images and the information society, and their mutual influence and interaction not only changes the way human beings understand and use images, but also profoundly affects the social structure and the way of cultural inheritance. First of all, the popularization and circulation of technological images have greatly accelerated the dissemination of information, and people can obtain and disseminate information through images, strengthening the connection and communication between members of society. However, at the same time, technical images also bring information overload and authenticity problems, making people rely more on images rather than words to obtain information, resulting in fragmentation and superficiality of information dissemination.
Second, the advent of technological imagery has changed the perception and use of public space. Traditionally, public space has been redefined as a virtual space where people can participate in and shape public discourse through technological imagery, rather than being limited by geography. The emergence of this kind of virtual public space not only enhances the individual's sense of participation and right to expression, but also brings problems such as information overload and social media anxiety.
Finally, the popularity and popularity of technological images has also affected the way humans communicate and communicate remotely. Traditionally, face-to-face communication has been replaced by technological images, allowing people to communicate and video conferencing remotely through devices such as mobile phones and computers without having to physically be in front of each other. Although this method of remote communication has improved efficiency and convenience, it has also brought about the problem of virtualization and alienation of interpersonal relationships, making real communication between people less and less.
III. The Impact of Technological Imagery on Human Relationships
A. The rupture of human connections and the disintegration of public space
The popularity and popularity of technological images has led to a rupture of human connections and the disintegration of public space. Traditional face-to-face communication is gradually being replaced by technological images, and people rely more on mobile phones, computers and other devices for remote communication and social interaction. While this virtual form of communication increases efficiency and convenience, it also weakens the real communication and emotional connection between people. In the virtual space, people tend to pay more attention to the superficial form and ignore the deep emotions and values. As a result, the proliferation of technological images has made human connections increasingly fragile and social relationships more and more superficial.
The disintegration of public space is also a consequence of the proliferation of technological images. The traditional sense of public space has been redefined as a virtual space, where people can participate in public discourse and social communication through platforms such as social media and online forums. However, in virtual spaces, people tend to communicate more with the screen and ignore the real world and others around them. The emergence of such virtual public spaces has led to the marginalization and neglect of real spaces, making people more isolated and alienated. As a result, the proliferation of technological images has challenged the meaning and function of public spaces, and social relations have become increasingly fragmented and fragile.
B. Theoretical conception of a society of dialogue and telecommunication
The popularization of technological images has changed the way people communicate and communicate remotely, and human society has entered a new stage of dialogue and remote communication society. In this new social form, people are no longer limited to face-to-face communication, but also conduct remote communication and video conferencing through mobile phones, computers, and other devices. While this method of remote communication has improved efficiency and convenience, it has also brought a new set of problems and challenges.
First, the virtualization of conversations has led to the alienation of interpersonal relationships and the deterioration of social skills. In virtual spaces, it's often easier for people to show their superficial image and ignore the real emotions and communication needs. As a result, virtual conversations often lack sincerity and depth, making relationships increasingly superficial and fragile.
Second, the proliferation of remote communication has brought problems such as information overload and social media anxiety. In the virtual space, people are often overwhelmed by the amount of information and noise, and it is difficult to sift through valuable content from it. At the same time, the advent of social media has made it easier for people to fall into social comparisons and anxiety, leading to increased mental health problems and interpersonal strain.
C. Integration of Device and Man: The Generation and Definition of "Device and Man".
The popularization of technological images has not only changed people's social relations, but also profoundly affected people's own identity and lifestyle. In the world of technological images, people are no longer simply viewers and consumers, but a new type of subject that merges with technological devices: "device-person".
First, the proliferation of technological images has led to a greater reliance on technological devices to capture and express information. Mobile phones, computers and other devices have become the necessities of people's lives, and people can take pictures, record their lives, and communicate with others anytime and anywhere through these devices. Therefore, technological devices are not only tools of human life, but also an extension and expression of human beings themselves.
Second, the proliferation of technological images has also limited human freedom and choice. In the world of technological images, people are often bound by technological devices such as social media and online advertising, and it is difficult to get rid of their influence and control. Therefore, while technological devices bring convenience and efficiency to humans, they also bring certain risks and challenges that require vigilance and a critical attitude.
IV. The philosophical ideas of Luxel's media theory
A. Theoretical fusion of posthumanism and neohumanism
Frusel's media theory proposes a posthumanist idea that emphasizes the reconstruction of human cognition and identity by technological images. Within this theoretical framework, traditional anthropocentrism is subverted and replaced by a techno-image-centric perspective. At the same time, however, Frusel also calls for a re-examination of the value and dignity of the human being through the approach of neo-humanism, rather rather than completely indulging in technological images.
The theoretical fusion of posthumanism and neohumanism emphasizes the interactive relationship between humans and technological images. In Frusel's view, the technical image is not only a tool or medium, but also a challenge and reconstruction of human cognition and identity. At the same time, however, humanity can also re-examine its identity and worth through the path of neo-humanism, so as to better respond to the challenges and changes brought about by technological images.
B. The challenge and reconstruction of human subjectivity by technical images
The challenge of technological images to human subjectivity is mainly reflected in two aspects: one is the impact on individual cognition and identity, and the other is the change of social relations and values.
First, technological images have changed the way people perceive and the process of identity construction. Under the traditional anthropocentric concept, people tend to see themselves as subjects and technological images as objects. However, with the popularization and popularity of technological images, people gradually realize that they are also part of technological images, and the process of individual cognition and identity construction has also been reconstructed. Therefore, the challenge of technological images to human subjectivity is to redefine the relationship between the individual and technology, as well as the identity of the individual in the era of technological images.
Second, technological images change the social relationships and values between people. In the traditional social order, people often rely on face-to-face communication and physical interaction to establish and maintain social relationships. However, with the popularization and popularity of technological images, people have gradually shifted social relations and communication to the virtual space, which has led to the superficialization of interpersonal relationships and the transformation of social values. Therefore, the reconstruction of human subjectivity by technological images lies in redefining the relationship between the individual and society, as well as the status and role of the individual in society.
C. Critique and reflection on the values of the technographic society
In a society of technological images, people tend to fall into utilitarianism and superficial values, ignoring real emotions and humanism. Therefore, it is essential to critique and reflect on the values of the technological image society.
First, there is a need to re-examine the impact of technological images on human cognition and identity, as well as the role of technological images in social relations and values. It is only through criticism and reflection that people become aware of the problems and challenges posed by technical images and actively seek solutions.
Second, people need to promote the human spirit and human dignity, and maintain sincere and deep communication between people in a society of technological images. It is only by valuing the human spirit and human dignity that people can truly achieve self-worth and social harmony.
V. Practical Applications and Implications of Frucsell's Media Theory
Analysis of the impact of technological imagery on contemporary society and culture
In contemporary society, technological imagery has profoundly influenced the way we live, our cultural perceptions, and the way we interact with society.
First, technological images have changed the way we access information and express opinions. Through the internet and social media, people can easily acquire various forms of technical images such as pictures, videos, and animations. This convenient way of disseminating information has led to a sharp increase in the amount of information, but it has also increased the challenges of information fragmentation and authenticity, leading to problems such as information overload and the spread of rumors.
Second, technological imagery has changed our cultural perceptions and aesthetic tastes. With the popularity of mobile photography and image processing software, everyone can become an image creator, resulting in a large number of image content emerging. The rise of this image culture not only enriches our lives, but also brings the problem of aesthetic fatigue and information overload, which makes us more selective about the selection and appreciation of image content.
B. Prospects for the application of Freund's theory in today's information age
In today's information age, Frusel's media theory has important application prospects, which can provide useful insights for us to understand and respond to the challenges posed by technical images.
First, Frusel's media theory can help us understand the reconstruction of human cognition and identity by technological images. By analyzing the role and impact of technological images in social culture, we can better understand the impact of technological images on individual and group cognition, so that we can respond accordingly.
Second, Frusel's media theory can help us navigate the ethical and legal challenges posed by technological imagery. By analyzing the application and impact of technical images in social life, we can better formulate relevant laws, regulations and ethical guidelines to protect the rights and interests of individuals and society.
VI. Conclusion
Frusel's theory of media presents a number of important points that are important for understanding the impact of technological images on human relationships. Its key contributions include:
First of all, Frusel emphasized the importance of media in human society. He believes that media is not only a tool for information transmission, but also an important part of social structure and cultural form, which has a profound impact on human cognition and behavior.
Second, Flusail focuses on the media's reconstruction of human identity and cognition. He argues that media has not only changed the way we live and socialize, but has also influenced our cognitive patterns and identity construction, leading to the rise of posthumanism and neohumanism.
Finally, Frusel emphasized that the impact of media on individuals and societies is complex and diverse. He pointed out that the media can not only promote social change and individual liberation, but also lead to social control and individual alienation, so it is necessary to be cautious about the influence of the media to protect the rights and interests of individuals and society.
Author: Lu Xilin
Bibliography:
Flusser, V. (2000). Writings. University of Minnesota Press.
Röttger, B. (Ed.). (2002). Vilém Flusser: Kommunikologie. Knight.
Disclaimer: All articles (including graphics, papers, audio and video, etc.) under my account can be reprinted or quoted at will after 72 hours from the date of publication, without informing me. If you need to request a manuscript, please contact [email protected]