Parents are tough teachers, find teachers with different topics to make mistakes, parents think it is right, stifling imagination shamelessly
Hello everyone, I'm a crying kitten. Here's wishing the friends who read this article in advance, family harmony, all the best, financial resources, and all wishes come true!
Some netizens posted a test paper with the topic of finding differences, a child was deducted ten points, and he didn't get any points.
The first question is cars, fire trucks, trains, ambulances,
The child chose the car, which was thought to be wrong, and the answer was the train.
The second question is fish, ducks, geese, chickens,
The child chose the chicken, which was considered wrong, and the answer was fish.
The teacher asked the parents to sign and confirm, but the parents wrote down such a sentence - Hello Mr. Wang: I have communicated with the child, I think the child answered no problem according to the question, the first question, he said: The car can be bought by himself, and the other three can not be bought by himself; In the second question, he said: Fish, geese, and ducks can swim, only chickens can't swim.
If you only look at the standard answers, the child is indeed wrong. However, after listening to the child's explanation, everyone found that the child's understanding was completely reasonable.
In cars, fire trucks, trains, and ambulances, the standard answer is trains, because the other 3 are all wheeled, and trains use tracks. But the child said that the car can be bought with money, it is a private car, and the other three are public cars, so if you understand it this way, there is no problem at all.
The second question is fish, duck, goose, chicken, and the standard answer is fish, as the other three are counted as poultry. But what the children said is right, fish, ducks and geese can swim in the water, but chickens can't, from this point of view, there is no problem.
Therefore, the majority of netizens agreed that when the teacher saw that the answers were inconsistent, he directly deducted the score and did not ask, which is really not right.
——Anhui netizen: As long as the child can say a certain truth, it is right! Looking at the side of the ridge into a peak, the distance and the height are different! The teacher is superficial!
——Henan netizens: It's so good! The cultivation of critical thinking is to open the floodgates of children's thinking, not to limit it with traditional standards!!
——American netizen: Obedient children have no ability to think actively, and what is even more terrifying is that they have cultivated a pleasing personality. Parental responsibility is the greatest.
——Henan netizens: Chinese-style education is always easy to fall into the solidification of thinking, either black or white, but things are two-sided, according to the requirements of the topic, it is not wrong for children to change their perspective to look at the problem.
As a teacher in the lower grades, there is certainly nothing wrong with sticking to the standard answers, and there is no problem with deducting the child's marks. But the teacher must tell the child that there is nothing wrong with his thinking and that he should be encouraged to think in a diffuse way.
Education should tap children's strengths, not stifle children's talents, but our standardized education has been stifling children's imagination, and eventually cultivating a bunch of modeled talents. This is indeed food for thought.
The same talent, in fact, is not a talent, it can only be said to be a screw.