Our topic this time is very strange, let's pick it up, talk about it, this messy thing, think deeply, look far away. So let's have an in-depth analysis, let's take this matter out and put it on the table, just the follow-up to this "curtain hearing".
Speaking of which, this article is to the point, and I am very angry when I look at it. Nowadays, court cases are actually like remote-controlled toys, with one conductor at the top and one jumping below. This "superiors guide subordinates" is really beautifully said. Peel off the skin and take a look, in fact, it is control and intervention, we ordinary people are not stupid, this eye is very bright.
Look at the explanations of the law enforcement side, a set of sets, it sounds dazzling. First of all, the defender did not follow the rules, so he had to rush up to take pictures while the court was adjourned. Hey, you think, if you don't find something strange, who has nothing to do? Besides, our lawyers are performing their duties and protecting the interests of their clients, shouldn't this be a top priority?
Why does this official rhetoric sound so awkward? How did the kind "guidance" suddenly turn into a fatal "remote command"? And what do you say "seriously disrupt the order", oh I said, didn't you just take two photos! If it weren't for this farce, we, the people, would still be in the dark.
Speaking of the word "compliance" in this article, I think it is called the spirit of the law at best, and moral character at worst. How can we, the judges, who should be the guardians of these two, violate the principle of independence and impartiality for the sake of so-called "guidance"? It's really chest-tight.
The law explains this matter, and the people must be convinced. You have changed your appearance, where is there still the shadow of the law, it's just a trick of the law. What is the bottom line of the law? Where exactly?
Now that the Internet is so developed, our people's eyes are also bright, the matter has broken out, the court can be on the hot search, and there are a lot of people who don't think it's a big deal to watch the excitement. Although your public opinion is not easy to control, you have to let the dignity of the law stand up. If it is really like the "Bottom Line" said at the end of the article, the judges can be so right, we will rest assured.
Finally, let's critic say a few words, the law is not merciful, the circumstances are excusable, and the law must be strict. This matter of "hanging the curtain to hear the trial" can be put aside and talk slowly. However, there must be a process of clarifying the truth and returning the law to a clean slate. Otherwise, where will we put the face of the rule of law society? Where does the confidence of our citizens go?
Don't say much, we have to continue to pay attention to this matter, after all, this is the business of each of us, the bottom line of our rule of law, and the rights and obligations of each of us. The court's response, and the future direction, must be open and transparent, and ensure the fair and just enforcement of the law. The voices of our little people are chattering here, looking forward to a clear destination. We respect the law and abide by the law, and we hope that the law will abide by justice.