Shocking event! A local court actually uses WeChat software to conduct trial command! The news shocked society as a whole and raised deep concerns about the fairness and transparency of the judiciary.
The picture comes from the Internet
It is reported that this incident occurred in a local people's court, where the judge and the president of the division actually commanded the trial in real time through WeChat software, and even used words such as "no need to discuss with him", "interrupt" and "hard point" in the group chat. This kind of command of the judicial process is simply incredible! What's even more shocking is that the defense lawyer's law enforcement recorder was turned on by the bailiff, causing chaos at the trial scene!
The picture comes from the Internet
This incident has aroused heated discussions and questions from all walks of life. First of all, is it legal for WeChat to direct the trial? Why did the court choose this abnormal method of communication? Does this mean that there are hidden dangers in the existing court command process? In this regard, I believe that a more standardized and transparent command procedure should be established within the court to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents.
The picture comes from the Internet
What is even more worrying is that the defense lawyer secretly filmed the presiding judge's WeChat chat during the adjournment, which was found to be a violation of court discipline. This raises questions about the role of the presiding judge in the trial. Isn't it a distortion of the principle of judicial impartiality that the presiding judge, as the leader of the judicial process, has been affected by external interference? In this regard, I believe that the presiding judge should remain neutral and impartial, and not be affected by any external interference.
The picture comes from the Internet
According to the court report, the media reported that the matter had sparked public opinion and was found to have interfered with the normal conduct of litigation activities. However, if there is opacity or impartiality within the courtroom, isn't public opinion supervision a powerful weapon for the public to uphold judicial fairness? How can the judiciary balance the relationship between supervision by public opinion and judicial independence, and ensure the impartiality and transparency of judicial activities? In this regard, I believe that the courts should pay more attention to the feedback of public opinion, actively respond to public concerns, and enhance judicial transparency and fairness.
The picture comes from the Internet
What is even more encouraging is that the lawyers dared to stand up and express their dissatisfaction with this abnormal judicial phenomenon and jointly report to the police. This highlights the important role of lawyers in the judicial process, and they are an important force in safeguarding the rights and interests of clients and judicial fairness. However, the court notice appears to treat the lawyer's act of filming the presiding judge's WeChat chat during the adjournment as a violation of court discipline. This has led to a discussion about the code of conduct for lawyers and the definition of their rights and responsibilities in the judicial process. In this regard, I believe that lawyers should strictly abide by laws and regulations and exercise their duties and rights while safeguarding the rights and interests of their clients.
The picture comes from the Internet
The picture comes from the Internet
The revelation of the whole incident has sparked public shock and outrage, which also reflects the public's high concern for judicial fairness and transparency. Whether the courts should pay more attention to the feedback of public opinion, and how to respond to public concerns by enhancing judicial transparency and impartiality, is an issue that needs to be seriously considered.
The picture comes from the Internet
Netizens are hotly discussed
Netizens have discussed this incident a lot, showing their anger and concern about the dean's remote control of the trial and judicial fairness:
"This kind of dean should not only be cleared out of the team, but also sentenced to prison and let him be punished!"
"I finally know why the court doesn't allow photography, videotaping, and audio recording."
"Knowing the law and breaking the law, the crime is added to the first!! Criminal responsibility must be pursued in accordance with the law! Severely punish the !! who do not lend"
"Governing the country according to law should start with the political and legal departments and government organs. A long way to go"
The picture comes from the Internet
"If you can't take pictures, videos and audio recordings, how can it be fair and just";
The picture comes from the Internet
This is an effective means to eliminate external interference and achieve fair law enforcement:
"I believe that in the future, the court and other departments will ask for the surrender of the mobile phone";
The picture comes from the Internet
"We've been like this for a long time, and you can only enter if you put all your mobile phones in the storage box before you enter the court";
The picture comes from the Internet
There should be whole-process trial monitoring, which can effectively supervise the trial process, which is conducive to achieving openness and transparency and fair law enforcement:
"All courts should be allowed to take videos so that they can improve the professionalism of judges";
The picture comes from the Internet
"All trials must be broadcast live to see who still dares";
The picture comes from the Internet
"Power is not overlooked. How terrible"
The picture comes from the Internet
This incident involved many aspects such as the internal management of the court, the fairness of the judicial process, and the professionalism of lawyers. This is not just a simple WeChat command case, but also a severe test of judicial fairness and transparency. Only through in-depth investigation and reflection can public trust in the judicial system be restored and the fairness and transparency of judicial activities can be ensured.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.
The picture comes from the Internet