"There is always only one truth, and time will tell."
The case, in which 12 young people were arrested for picking quarrels and provoking trouble in Qinghai Province, continues to brew in the public eye. The legal procedures and trial procedures that should have been frank have caused a lot of waves under the collision of forces of all parties, and even caused an uproar on the Internet. As a society governed by the rule of law, we must face it calmly. But it is more necessary to maintain a rational attitude in order to find traces of truth in the voices of all sides.
The Haixi Intermediate People's Court reported that one stone stirred up a thousand waves
On May 13, the Intermediate People's Court of Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Qinghai Province suddenly issued a circular, publicly responding to the case for the first time. The report comprehensively explained the ins and outs of the case and pointed out that the defense lawyer had disrupted the order of the courtroom. This announcement immediately set off a lot of repercussions on the Internet, and many forces also expressed their views.
In particular, lawyer Li Zhuang issued a 20-point rebuttal of the content of the circular, strongly questioned the court's practice, and once again requested that the entire court video be made public. In the eyes of the outside world, the Intermediate People's Court's move is a bit like dropping a bombshell, directly naming and naming names to trigger a debate, which can be described as a tough defense lawyer camp. The strength of the method makes people have to ponder, is the Intermediate Court going to have peace with the lawyers?
All the lawyers responded to the hard and rigid intermediate court
After the Haixi Intermediate People's Court issued the circular, the five lawyers involved in the defense of the case quickly issued a joint response, refuting the contents of the circular one by one. They said that the Intermediate People's Court's report was seriously inaccurate and deliberately ignored the truth. The defense lawyer also said that the accusation of disrupting the order of the court by the Intermediate People's Court was completely fabricated. In fact, every action of the lawyer during the trial is within the scope of the law.
They stressed that all arguments are based on reason to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Compared with the strong wording of the Intermediate People's Court's circular, the response of the lawyers' group appeared to be more calm and rational. They said they would not be brought down by the pressure of the Intermediate Court, and once again strongly called for the full video of the court to be made public to restore the truth.
The back and forth between the two sides has made the situation more complicated, and it is difficult for people to understand the truth for a while. However, it can be seen that the lawyers' response is full of rationality and determination, and they are confident that they will defend the rights and interests of the client in this case through the legal process. This calm and firm response also makes people more recognize the justice of the lawyer's profession.
Fair administration of justice requires a multifaceted effort
Whether this case can return to rationality in the confrontation between the two sides requires the joint efforts of all walks of life. Impartial administration of justice should not only rely on judges or lawyers, but also require supervision and restraint from all sectors of society.
As the core of justice, judges shoulder the sacred mission of upholding justice. They must always remember that everyone is equal before the law, enforce the law impartially, and stick to the bottom line. At this moment, judges need to remain calm and rational, use sufficient facts and logic to resolve doubts from the outside world, and use fair trials to prove themselves to society.
As a court defender, a lawyer should also uphold the original intention of upholding justice. When defending the rights and interests of their clients, they need to abide by the rules of the court, maintain rational communication with the judges, and not affect the credibility of the judiciary in a radical way. After all, the power of reason is far greater than anger.
The public needs to be rational and objective. In the face of complex and chaotic information, we must deeply understand the position of each side, supervise the possible problems, but also give time and space to verify the truth. Because it is noble to respect others and respect others. Standing in the course of history, each of us should contribute to fairness and justice.
Only when all the people are united and every cell of society is functioning, can the great machine of justice truly become a solid barrier to uphold justice and punish evil. Together, let us move forward and continue to work for truth and justice. It may be difficult, but as long as we don't give up, we will eventually see the dawn of hope.
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to carry it to other platforms within 72 hours, and the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding