Run, as the most out-of-the-circle homophonic stalk (run) in the past two years
At first, when immigrants or study abroad agencies advertised, they avoided searching for sensitive words and said that they had immigrated abroad, but later because it became a meme, it spread widely among young people.
There is even a "Runxue" in the online community.
In fact, I have always felt that there is nothing to talk about this issue, and I myself have come back from studying abroad for many years, and I have never felt that this is a problem.
Today, "run" and "not run" can become a kind of discussion, which in itself means that this matter is a mixed bag, that is to say, for many people, the cost of "run" is likely to be greater than the benefit.
And this matter, 30 years ago, there was no need to dwell on it. 30 years ago, as long as you said that you had the ability to "run", even if it was just to go abroad to study, you would get everyone, and remembering was the envy of everyone.
Didn't Gao Xiaosong tell a joke before, he said:
When you were able to study abroad, do you know what the treatment was? That is, you take your visa and admission letter, walk into any famous university in Beijing, and say to the school flower on the spot: 'Would you like to go to the United States with me to study?' 'If the school girl doesn't go back, I'll just go with you!'
Although this paragraph is somewhat exaggerated, it reflects the fact that "run" and "not run" were not a problem that needed to be discussed 30 years ago, but if you have a little ability and resources, you will definitely run.
At that time, it was not uncommon for directors of inland provinces to resign and go to the United States to drive trucks, and university professors to wash dishes in Chinese restaurants. Even the official inspection group needs to send people to keep an eye on everyone, so they are afraid that everyone will be stranded and will not return.
As a result, there have also been a lot of tragicomedies, such as the movies "Pekingese in New York", "The Great Satan", and "See You or Leave" all tell such stories.
Therefore, 30 years ago, China did not need to discuss whether it was moist or not, but after more than 30 years and nearly 40 years, China's development is still getting better and better, and more and more international students choose to return to China for development.
China did not collapse, and at that time, many people who had the ability and resources but chose to go out could not be said to be 100%, 96% of them were actually not as good as those who stayed in China and whose ability and resources were slightly inferior to their classmates and colleagues.
In fact, "moist" and "non-moist" boil down to whether you feel that this country has hope, and whether your future development in this country can surpass the rest of the world. And this country is worth investing in its own "youth", "time", and "life".
Although many friends like to put an unpatriotic hat on Run's people. But I think that patriotism, although it seems to have a very strong emotional element, is still essentially a profit-driven - that is, through the prosperity of the country, the people living in it can get more practical benefits.
If you look at this as an "investment behavior", then the logic of the choice is clear - look at the ROI (return on investment)
From the perspective of national development, although it is indeed a loss for talents to run out, looking back on the past few decades, a large number of real talents have not delayed the development of the country - and this kind of brain drain has improved a lot in recent years, so it is actually completely open-minded about this matter.
All in all, although I can't support the choice of personal run, I don't oppose it, and I don't agree with it.
It's just that there is a classic saying, which I have always agreed with, that is: a person's destiny, of course, depends on self-struggle, but it also takes into account the course of history.
Why do you mention this? This is also related to the gradual change of the general environment:
In the past three or four decades, the general environment has been stable – for China, it is reform and opening up, and in the United States, white leftism prevails, and universal values prevail; Economically, it is globalized, and the total amount of human wealth is increasing; Although Sino-US relations have been bumpy, they are also dominated by cooperation.
At this historical stage, after exploration, the Chinese successive generations of moisteners have roughly formed a set of more reliable "runxue" logic: both the low-level poor and the upper-class local tyrants are suitable for run, the technical middle class can run, and the non-technical middle class is not recommended to run.
The bottom is easy to understand: the working people at the bottom go to the West, whether you go to repair water pipes, move bricks or wash dishes, and earn much more than in China. Although they still live at the bottom of the local area after running out - but these things are actually the same in China, but the absolute material living standard and income are far stronger abroad than at home, so for this group of people, as long as they can endure the pain of homesickness, the harvest of running out is indeed far greater than the return.
The upper class of tyrants can better explain this: capitalists naturally prefer the capitalist system, in which capital is the most beautiful in the power structure. This indulgence of capital, and the extreme pleasure of belonging to capital, is the most addictive drug in capitalist society.
As for the middle class, this has to be distinguished: for those scientific research and technical talents, whether it is suitable depends on the situation - generally speaking, it is the trade-off between income and upside. People who want to run out must have a better income or working environment than in China, but the career upward space is usually limited - a tenured professor who is engaged in academia will reach the sky; Those who are engaged in technology in enterprises are at most middle-level. If you can accept this ceiling, you will go; I can't accept it, so it's okay to stay in the domestic roll - at least the upper limit of the career ceiling should be high.
As for liberal arts, business, and arts, this is highly related to race, civilization, and country, and this kind of person goes out to find himself unhappy - unless he earns enough money and goes out directly to retire.
This set of distinguishing methods has been prevalent for many years and is considered to be a long time tested, so it has been used to this day. But in reality, it is already on the verge of collapse.
What kind of world is the world now: the dividends of the third scientific and technological revolution have been wiped out, and the four sciences are far away - this means that the ceiling of the total amount of human wealth has reached the bottleneck; At the same time, the conflict between the westward countries that dominate the rules of the game and the emerging countries that want to re-establish a new set of rules is becoming more acute.
In this case, globalization is gradually disintegrating, populism is prevalent in the West, and the contradictions between the East and the West, especially between China and the United States, are becoming increasingly intensified.
So what does this have to do with "Run"?
It's a big deal!
First of all, the ebb of globalization and the advent of stagflation mean that there are fewer jobs - the West is already a mature economy in the late stage of development, and the ceiling of the third industrial revolution has almost been touched by them, and there is not much room for incremental growth, and this is still facing the strong competition of China's industrial upgrading.
Second, ultra-nationalism and even fascist populist ideas are gradually on the rise, replacing the universal values of the white left, which is rooted in the prosperous economic growth of the past, and under the current situation of economic involution, racism and populist ideas will inevitably rise, and now it is only ideological discrimination, and I personally predict that if this development continues, within 10 years, there will inevitably be a global sensation of racial violence in developed countries. The more we go, the more organized and systematic this ideology will be, similar to McCarthyism or even Nazis.
Finally, it is inevitable that Sino-US relations will deteriorate and even become confrontational. Social emotions need to be poured out, and Americans can't directly vent their anger on Chinese citizens, and the only ones who bear the social anger are Chinese Americans in the United States, which can be referred to the situation of Japanese Americans after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. And the ethnic groups of Chinese Americans, who have always been the most vulnerable and timid overseas, will inevitably become a middle ground in conflict – commonly known as "cannon fodder".
This is a holistic change in the macro environment. This change in the general trend is not something you can reverse by just relying on art. Moreover, each class of Runmin will suffer corresponding blows:
And this change in circumstances will have to bear a corresponding price regardless of class, from the capitalists to the dishwashers.
For the capitalists who run out, the Russian tycoons are a lesson from the past. Even if the United States does not liquidate its Chinese capital, it will still not be able to integrate into the core capital circle of the United States, and can only continue to do business related to China, losing the right to participate in the economy of the United States.
Needless to say, the first people to be unlucky when populism is rampant are the bottom, and they are the direct targets of the surging public anger. No matter what dimension, Chinese Americans are the most vulnerable group of people, first of all, they are not united, and secondly, anti-China is the largest or even the only consensus in American politics, and the mainstream public opinion in the United States has always dumped the social problems of the United States on the Chinese and robbed them of their jobs. The capitalists can still stay in the rich areas and maintain superficial harmony with the white rich businessmen, but the people at the bottom can only feel the most real malice in the middle of the red neck.
The middle level is also uncomfortable, and it was originally for a better life, but with the thinning of interests, the gap between the rich and the poor, and the intensification of social contradictions, the good days are really coming to an end. To put it bluntly, China's technology Runmin went to the United States, and the picture is nothing more than the growth space in the field of income and technology. And both of these are likely to deteriorate in the future environment. Moreover, this deterioration of professionalism will also be accompanied by the deterioration of the living environment of Chinese Americans in society, which can be described as a double ghost knocking on the door, which makes matters worse.
All in all, the trend of de-globalization, the trend of economic stagflation and even the Great Depression, the trend of populism in the West, and the trend of confrontation between China and the United States. As long as these four major trends remain unchanged, the situation of the Chinese in the West, especially the Chinese in the United States, can be said to be a tragic situation that can be seen by the naked eye in the future.
When the economic downturn forces the West to shed the pretense of political correctness and reveal the true face of right-leaning, all the so-called bargaining chips that individuals think they can rely on are actually not worth mentioning in the new atmosphere of radicalized political correctness. The technique is irreversible, this is the law of eternity!
In this environment, under this general trend. If you still want to moisten, then you have to think about it! No one will stop you. But if you run, don't regret it, and don't cry and shout to come back when the time comes, or let you go back and make a fuss about treatment - after all, you can say it yourself whether you run it or not. But after the run, I regret it and want to come back, when the time comes, this side will not accept you, and how to settle you after accepting it, that is China's final say.
People, after all, have to pay for their own choices.