Recently, at Qiaosi Vocational High School in Hangzhou, an 18-year-old man committed an incomprehensible act when he secretly photographed a woman's skirt. This behavior was exposed on the spot, and in a panic, he kept apologizing and deleting the photos that should not exist. So the question is, is it enough to apologize and delete to compensate for the harm of privacy violation?
The problem was not resolved, but the school had a new move, they approached the lady, offered to meet and possibly wanted to settle the matter privately, but the woman decisively refused. It can be seen that people's awareness of privacy protection is gradually increasing, and it is no longer easy to soothe with an apology.
Loading...
There may be several reasons why the school tries to contact the girl to meet and resolve it privately:
Schools may want to know first-hand about the circumstances of the incident and the victim's feelings so that they can better handle the incident and provide the necessary support and assistance. Face-to-face communication with the victim allows the school to better understand the victim's injuries and needs, so that they can respond more appropriately.
Addressing such issues privately is sometimes seen as a way to reduce public concern and avoid further escalation. The school may want to reconcile to protect the student, the school's reputation, and avoid the negative impact of the incident being widely disseminated. At the same time, it may also be out of concern for the privacy of both parties involved, trying to deal with the problem in a more low-key way.
The school may also contact the girls and offer to meet them, in the hope that they can reach an agreement through communication and negotiation and avoid the complexities and long-term effects of legal proceedings or public battles. This may lead to a quicker resolution of the issue, while also providing substantial compensation or apology to the victim to minimize the harm caused by the incident.
Regardless of the school's intentions, it is important to ensure that the rights and interests of victims are respected and protected, and that appropriate measures are taken to prevent similar incidents from happening again.
Then, on May 12, the school issued a notice that the boy involved, accompanied by his parents, had voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau and began to bear the consequences caused by his misconduct. This 18-year-old boy may never have imagined that behind the impulse is such a serious legal responsibility and social impact.
Netizens have a lot of discussions on this matter:
Nor can a person under 18 do such a thing
Today's children are not in a good mood, and we didn't even dare to hold hands at that time
I used to go to Disney with my friends, and when I was queuing, a little sister asked me for help, and a guy was there to shoot, and I kicked his mobile phone away, and the sense of justice was bursting.
It's time for adults to take responsibility for themselves, and it's not appropriate to do this kind of thing without leaving a criminal record
After deleting, you can also retrieve it from the recent deletion, and it is better to call the police when you encounter this kind of thing
I really want to forgive a child who has just become an adult, but if it is so easy to be forgiven, I am afraid that he will feel lucky and will do it again in the future, so I still have to punish him
Although the gimmick is enough, it makes people ponder, what are the shortcomings of our society reflected behind such events? Is it a blind spot in education, a lack of moral constraints, or a lag in privacy protection behind the rapid development of the Internet? How can we address these issues at their root and prevent similar incidents from happening again?
Let us think again: how to balance privacy and online freedom? Is everyone clearly aware of the cost of personal misconduct? Should society and each of us pay more attention and be more disciplined in such incidents?