Thank you for your support, share news events in real time every day, if you like this article, just use your rich little hands to pay attention, share more, comment more~
Text|Netizens commented on Lele
Editor|Netizens commented on Lele
Preface
In Shaoyang, Hunan, during the trial of a case, the defendant Xiao looked at the letter of commitment submitted by the plaintiff.
The video can be viewed here
Loading...
Video source: @Jiupai News
Suddenly put the letter of commitment into his mouth, and the presiding judge immediately stopped it.
The loan dispute between Xiao and the plaintiff Liu originated from a loan commitment of 200,000 yuan.
Image source network
According to Liu, Xiao failed to repay the loan on time, so she was forced to seek a solution through legal channels.
Liu submitted the original written commitment of Xiao as evidence in court, hoping to prove the fact of the loan and Xiao's repayment obligation.
Image source network
During the trial, Xiao questioned the authenticity of the written promise and asked the judge to allow him to examine the evidence again.
The judge agreed to his request, and Xiao abruptly tore up the document and tried to swallow it in an attempt to destroy the evidence.
Image source network
The presiding judge quickly intervened and stopped Xiao's behavior, but the evidence had been partially destroyed.
As soon as the topic was posted on the Internet, the comment area instantly exploded! Let's take a look
Netizen: Destroy the evidence, and the court directly acquiesces that the evidence is valid.
All evidence will be copied and submitted to the court before the lawsuit
Netizen: It's good to stay 21w for 15 days
To destroy the evidence is to acquiesce
Netizen: Is this a saving of 190,000
Destroying evidence, even if the evidence is false, the court finds it to be true, and as for the arrears and fines, the fines should be repaid
Netizen: This borrower is so cold, don't borrow money!
Well, not a single point is subtracted, plus ten thousand and 15 days
Netizen: The judge took out a stack of copies: You're hungry, aren't you?
Spend 10,000 to swallow paper, talent
Court decision
Xiao's move was immediately defined as a serious act of deliberately destroying important evidence and obstructing the people's court's hearing of the case. Under Chinese law, intentional destruction or falsification of evidence or obstruction of witnesses from testifying can be punishable by administrative detention or even criminal punishment depending on the severity of the circumstances. Considering Xiao's attitude of admitting his mistakes, the court finally decided to detain him for 15 days and impose a fine of 10,000 yuan.
Social repercussions
The incident quickly sparked heated discussions on social media and news sites, with many netizens expressing anger and incomprehension at Xiao's actions, believing that they not only violated the law, but also corrupted the social atmosphere. At the same time, the incident has raised concerns about judicial fairness and court discipline, with many expressing support for the dignity of the law and the authority of the courts.
Reflection and discussion
This incident is not only a severe test of Xiao's moral and legal awareness, but also a public demonstration of the transparency and impartiality of the mainland's judicial system. The incident shows that although the judicial system has some capacity to deal with emergencies, there is still a need to strengthen the prevention of similar situations and the legal education of the public.
In addition, the high level of public interest in this case reflects the high importance that society attaches to the rule of law and the general expectation of justice. This public sentiment can be transformed into a social force that promotes judicial reform and improves the relevant legal system, and enhances the authority and effectiveness of the law.
epilogue
Although Xiao's case has become a topic of conversation for its unusual behavior, more importantly, it reminds us that everyone is equal before the law and that any attempt to evade legal punishment will ultimately be punished as it deserves. The handling of this incident demonstrated the determination and ability of the judicial system to uphold the dignity of the law and ensure the fair implementation of the law. In this way, we can gradually build a more just, civilized and orderly society.
#网友##评论##邵阳##湖南##男子不想还钱当法官面把证据塞嘴里#