It is strange that the peasant class is reluctant to accept it. Obviously, they have made significant contributions to the country and society, but people of all stripes take "suffering and suffering" for granted, and individuals have come out to point fingers.
Most of them are "worried about farmers" as the chastity archway, seeking traffic rewards. Some of them have become lobbyists for capital and interest groups, and there are even "vanguards" in the Western world. Of course, there are those who worry about the sky, they don't care about the right things, and there are also those who are very trivial.
Today, we will take "farmers selling green savings" as a mirror. Farmers also commented on all walks of life and people to see how they reacted. Of course, I am a farmer, but my views are only my own, and if I cause discomfort, I have nothing to do with other farmers.
Let's talk about CCTV and CCTV first. They said no to "selling green savings". Moreover, it is defined as the act of destroying grain, destroying food security, and so on, and it almost labels the peasants as "distracting the people".
"If the law does not prohibit it", I think CCTV and CCTV should also know. The premise of "selling green savings" is that someone buys green savings, and I am afraid they also know it. The purpose of buying Qingchu is to raise livestock, and obviously I also know that the purpose of raising livestock is to develop animal husbandry, enrich the people's table, and also to reduce costs and improve the quality of livestock. If you don't buy green reserves, you will buy more grain, doesn't the central broadcasting know? So whether it's green storage or grain, doesn't it end up in the same way as the mouth of the livestock? What is the difference in essence?
Selling green savings, farmers earn a little more, live, simpler, the land is planted by the farmers themselves, "the law does not prohibit" things, when will it be the turn of the central radio to say "no"?
You don't want the peasants to earn an extra three or five hundred, or do you want to find a way to make up for it from other places? For example, you also said "no" to the increase in farmers' social security fees to 380 yuan a year? Say "no" to the real estate industry's encroachment on agricultural land? Say "no" to returning forests to farming, cutting down fruit trees, destroying forest land, and damaging the interests of the common people? Even if you are a green reserve, I haven't seen you say no to the acquisition of green reserves, and no to the capital that smuggled green savings to Japan and Europe and the United States!
Speaking of such a small incident of green reserves, it has risen to the height of affecting food security, and it is just a matter of worrying about the sky. Just as the common people were worried that the cooperation between CCTV and Japanese media would affect the security of our public opinion. Regardless of the strong opposition of the people, CCTV stubbornly reached a strategic partnership with the Japanese media, which really shocked everyone. Who is the person in Little Japan, who still cooperates with others on the battlefield of public opinion? This is very easy for little Japan to take advantage of loopholes and engage in infiltration, and our public opinion position, is it safe or not? You say that we farmers are not safe, that is not safe, let's first clarify your own "security issues".
Don't doubt the patriotic enthusiasm of the peasants, please go to the countryside to see, this season, the peasants are anxious because they can't plant rice because of the weather, not because they really don't have anything to eat, and there is no problem with the stock of every household to eat for a few years! It's a pity to panic in fear, it's a pity to be afraid of dragging the country back, and it's afraid that the compatriots in the city won't have food by then!
To put it mildly, if you come again to defend against foreign enemies, be active in the position, and send food to our PLA, basically all of them are peasants and ordinary people! As for CCTV, there are at most a few war correspondents.
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs said that it would investigate the Qingchu incident. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs is the most responsible. It was their dereliction of duty that caused the common people to sell the green savings for a few hundred yuan more.
Straw burning ban, your opinion has been taken, measures have also been taken, after the ban on burning a series of problems, when will they be solved? How to fix it?
In the past, the planting of economic forests and fruit trees was encouraged, but now the forests have been withdrawn to encourage animal husbandry and breeding in rural areas.
But as long as you can take the people to earn a few more money, who still has the heart to sell green savings?
To find out who is buying the green reserve, I am afraid the best direction is to find out who is buying the green reserve? Is it a domestic enterprise, individual, because of their own breeding needs, or engaged in green storage feed trade? If it's its own needs, it's reasonable, and if it's trade, then it's time to crack down! Don't point the finger at the peasants and let the peasants take the blame!
Don't be coerced by others. The main direction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs is to revitalize the countryside with farmers.
The Ministry of Education should also keep up and not allow education in rural areas to grow further.
Should the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security also consider that the social security paid by the elderly in rural areas should not rise again? Is it the same as urban retirement?
Here we have to talk about some well-known and famous people who eat traffic fees and even serve jobs in the Western world. People who do not live in the countryside and do not know anything about farm work, the countryside, and the peasants talk nonsense with evil purposes.
Here is just one typical example. After being known as a famous family, a big financial Internet celebrity. It does not recognize the peasants' hard work, nor does it care about the peasants' real suffering. It's a pleasure to talk about farmers and earn traffic fees. Whether it is the sacrifice of the peasants during the Anti-Japanese War, the selfless dedication of the peasants during the period when the intellectual youth went to the countryside, and the payment of public grain, etc., this guy is all distorted. I really want to ask him to go to the countryside to roll up his sleeves and plant for a few days, and experience that "on the afternoon of hoeing day, sweat drops into the soil", maybe he can close his stinky mouth.
To be honest, what farmers need is not to point fingers, let alone be taken advantage of. What the peasants need is real help, not guarding and pressing everywhere. If anyone can make the peasants' grain go with the market like other commodities, it will be the greatest help and the greatest motivation for the peasants.
"Emancipating the enthusiasm of the peasants" is the beginning of the revitalization of the countryside, and the rest of the so-called "arrangement", "worrying", and "pointing fingers" really do not play a role at all! The land, the peasants know how to plant, the country, the peasants also know how to love, more than anyone else loves passionately, love thoroughly, you can't eat, pot, but let the peasants carry it.
There is a spring breeze and summer rain, and there is a new year, and there will naturally be fifteen.
With all that said, who supports it? Who is against? See you in the comments section. #农民种地都说不挣钱, why are they still planting##农民积极性##为什么反对收割小麦做青储?##农民#