Recently, a topic that has caused widespread controversy is the issue of "deemed payment" empty accounts. I'm sure you've all heard of this word, but do you know what it means?
In layman's terms, some old employees who have retired due to working years or other reasons were regarded as having paid pension insurance premiums when they did not pay pension insurance premiums every month like us and me.
As the issue of "deemed payment" was raised, public opinion began to debate endlessly. At present, some experts are proposing wage cuts for state-owned enterprises in an attempt to solve this problem that has plagued many people. However, behind the experts' advice, concerns and doubts about the wage cuts of state-owned enterprises have also begun to emerge. This issue has attracted widespread attention, and it is even more popular in the online comment section. This article will take you through the ins and outs of this topic, and take a deep dive into the conflict and harmony between expert advice and voices in the comment section.
Who will pay the empty account of "deemed payment"?
Recently, the issue of empty accounts for "deemed payment" has attracted a lot of attention, and many people have begun to question the social fairness and rationality caused by this practice. To put it simply, the so-called "deemed contributions" refer to the fact that some state-owned enterprises or institutions only list employees' salaries as expenses, and ignore the relevant social insurance and provident fund fees that should be paid. As a result, employees enjoy higher wages without corresponding social protection.
To solve this problem, experts said, state-owned enterprises should consider reducing the salary level of employees to make up for previous empty account losses. They believe that the salary cut of state-owned enterprises can fundamentally avoid the recurrence of the problem of "deemed payment", and can also enhance the social image of enterprises and enhance the sense of belonging and cohesion of employees. Although this suggestion seems to bring substantial benefits to employees, netizens have different opinions on it.
Fryer in the comment area to see the opinions of netizens
As soon as the issue of salary cuts in state-owned enterprises was raised, it immediately aroused heated discussions among netizens. In the comment area, everyone expressed different views and emotions about the expert advice. Some people support the move by state-owned enterprises to cut wages, arguing that it will improve the welfare of employees and increase the company's sense of social responsibility. They believe that social equity and equality can only be achieved if the costs are borne by all.
However, there are also many who oppose it. They are worried that the wage cuts of SOEs will directly affect the quality of life of employees, and may even lead to more employment pressures and social instability. They believe that instead of leaving the bills for empty accounts to employees alone, SOEs should take responsibility and find solutions.
Finding balance and solutions
Faced with the problem of "deemed payment" empty account, we cannot simply treat it as black and white. Wage cuts in SOEs may be one way to solve this problem, but they also need to take into account the rights and living standards of individual employees. Solving this problem requires the joint efforts of governments, experts, enterprises and employees to find a balance and solution.
As a member of society, we should also respect the existence of different voices in the comment area, communicate and understand each other. Only in this way can we find better solutions and promote the progress and development of society.