The United States has repeatedly fabricated the "mainland threat theory" and even vigorously played the "Taiwan card" in Sino-Russian relations. And China is not accustomed to the United States at all, and has directly proved with its actions that the Taiwan Strait does not need Russia's "action".
1. The mainland shot 2 formations at the same time
According to Taiwan media news, Taiwan's coast guard department detected 5 mainland coast guard ships and 7 mainland official ships on the 9th, with a total of 12 ships assembled in Kinmen waters.
Taiwan immediately dispatched six coast guard boats to the on-site waters to continue to monitor the situation, and immediately shouted to the mainland to immediately stop its irrational behavior.
The Taiwan Strait Patrol also said that the formation carried out suspected maritime exercises in the so-called "restricted waters" on several occasions, and finally sailed out of the waters of Kinmen at 4:30 p.m. on the same day.
At this time, the Taiwan authorities suddenly discovered that something was wrong, and only 10 days had passed since the beginning of May, and the mainland had already sent a formation into the waters of Kinmen for the fourth time.
They even found that the mainland's formation sailing was different from the past, and for the first time, a coast guard ship and an official ship were dispatched to sail into the waters of Kinmen at the same time.
(For the first time, the mainland dispatched a coast guard ship and an official vessel to the waters of Kinmen at the same time)
Before the 9th of this month, the mainland had launched law enforcement inspections in the waters off Kinmen three times, and the Taiwan Strait Patrol Department had used the usual "real-time response" to these three inspections.
In other words, they can only watch the movements of mainland ships from a distance but do not dare to make a sound, obviously for fear of being "warned" by mainland ships.
However, the frequent entry of mainland ships into the waters around the Taiwan Strait to conduct inspections has obviously put the Taiwan side under pressure, and the Taiwan Strait patrol department has been exhausted in dealing with the mainland's continuous shrinking of the interval between inspections of Taiwan, and can even only do something in a hurry but have no choice but to do so.
Now, three months have passed since the "14 February vicious collision incident," and the Taiwan authorities have never given a reasonable explanation to the people on both sides of the strait on this matter.
At present, the time for Lai Qingde's inaugural speech is getting closer and closer, and in addition to the "Taiwan independence" elements on the island who are constantly preparing to move, the United States has also begun to vigorously play the "Taiwan card" in order to highlight Taiwan's importance to the United States and to find an excuse for itself to contain China.
Second, the United States frequently attacks China-Russia relations
Prior to this, the United States has been fabricating the "mainland threat theory" with empty words and white teeth, and has repeatedly provoked China on the grounds of "national security".
Recently, there has been an upsurge of anti-war protests in the United States surrounding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and a senator from the US Democratic Party, Jeanne Shaheen, has pointed the finger at China, claiming that China is funding protests in the United States.
Although Director of National Intelligence Haines later said that there was no evidence of China's involvement in the event, Shaheen continued to insist that there were reports of Chinese involvement in anti-war demonstrations at American universities.
(Jenny Shaheen publicly stated that China funded anti-war demonstrations in American universities)
This also proves that the United States is constantly playing up the "continental threat theory", and the most typical example of this is the Sino-Russian relationship.
Previously, the United States had repeatedly made a big fuss about "Sino-Russian relations," claiming that China and Russia had been carrying out strategic cooperation, and had also blamed China's "backland aid" for Russia's military industrial strength.
He even said around the Russia-Ukraine conflict that China has been exporting dual-use items to Russia, and Russia is likely to use these items for the "Russia-Ukraine conflict".
(The United States has repeatedly hyped "China's aid to Russia")
Although China has repeatedly refuted the United States' malicious smear of "China-Russia relations" and said that China has not provided weapons and equipment for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the United States obviously disagrees with it and even fabricates the argument that "Russia will help China on the Taiwan Strait issue".
Obviously, the United States wants to drive a wedge between China and Russia through public opinion pressure, so as to advance its strategic layout in the Asia-Pacific region and the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
China and Russia are obviously aware of the "conspiracy" of the United States, and have not "taken the bait", and even made more possibilities for cooperation between the two.
Liu Xuesong, director of the Department of Eurasia of the Ministry of Commerce of China, has made a public statement, saying that the bilateral economic and trade between China and Russia has overcome the complex external environment and continues to show vigor and vitality, and Liu Xuesong also said that China and Russia will continue to take positive measures in the next step to reach further cooperation in many fields and regions.
Third, the Taiwan Strait does not need Russia's intervention
Focusing on the US argument that "Russia will help resolve the Taiwan issue," let's briefly talk about a few points.
First of all, the argument itself is false.
China and Russia have always been good partners and have not reached an "alliance".
In a strategic sense, neither China nor Russia has the will to reach an "alliance," and they agree that the "alliance" is a strongly binding cooperation against a third party, and even believe that once an "alliance" is formed, it is very likely to lose its "flexibility" in diplomacy.
Second, there is indeed a lot of cooperation between China and Russia, including not only financial and economic cooperation, but also geopolitical security cooperation, in short, China and Russia are each other's rear.
This also allows China to deal with pressure from multiple directions such as the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, and the China-India border, while Russia can also feel comfortable with the pressure from Europe.
But this cooperation does not represent an "alliance" between China and Russia in the de jure sense.
Third, as far as the Taiwan issue is concerned, Chinese mainland will not rely on any third-party forces to solve it.
On the one hand, as far as Chinese mainland's existing military strength is concerned, it is very easy to solve the Taiwan issue, and it is obvious that Chinese mainland does not need any external intervention. Moreover, the mainland's preferred direction for resolving the Taiwan issue is still "peaceful reunification."
On the other hand, Chinese mainland has repeatedly stressed that no country will be allowed to interfere in China's internal affairs, and this sentence is not only for Taiwan but also for itself, and Russia has also publicly stated on many occasions that it will never interfere in China's internal affairs.
(The mainland does not rely on any external force to resolve the Taiwan issue)
In other words, there is no possibility of an "alliance" between China and Russia, China will neither participate in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, nor will Russia intervene in the Taiwan issue.
Obviously, the argument of the United States to smear "Sino-Russian relations" is untenable.