laitimes

In the context of the popularization of academic qualifications, what do teachers rely on to maintain their sense of superiority?

author:Zion Torch

In contemporary society, higher education is in a state of great popularity. Because from the late 90s to the present, higher education has continued to expand. And the expansion of academic qualifications is originally a matter of the back waves of the Yangtze River pushing the front waves. For example, in the 1980s, those who could be admitted to the technical secondary school were considered the top candidates, and those who could be admitted to the undergraduate program were no less than the current Qingbei resumption of diplomatic relations. But because of the continuous expansion. Therefore, in the 1980s, it was equivalent to the ranking of not graduating from primary school, and in the 2010s, you can go to a junior college.

In the context of the popularization of academic qualifications, what do teachers rely on to maintain their sense of superiority?

In the context of the large expansion of academic qualifications, it is difficult for teachers to maintain their sense of superiority by relying on academic advantages.

1. The crisis of teachers' superiority in academic qualifications

In the 1990s and 2000s, when the expansion of university enrollment was not yet obvious, primary and secondary school teachers were generally able to maintain their sense of superiority through academic qualifications. Because in those days, the main primary school teachers were technical secondary schools and junior colleges, and the middle school teachers had junior college and undergraduate students. Of course, this academic structure seems to be common now, and, from the mainstream point of view, most primary and secondary school teachers belong to non-high-quality players in the academic track - because at that time, they could be admitted to university but could not be admitted too well, so they would choose normal majors (although there are also 985 like Beijing Normal University, but the proportion is not large, and this article is talking about the mainstream). However, in the era of scarcity of academic qualifications, in the era when it is a victory to be able to read a secondary school, teachers do have a sense of superiority in academic qualifications.

In the context of the popularization of academic qualifications, what do teachers rely on to maintain their sense of superiority?

But now times have changed. Not only the undergraduate enrollment has expanded, but also the master's and doctoral students' enrollment has also expanded. In addition, there is a concentration of academic qualifications. The so-called concentration refers to the influx of undergraduate, master's and doctoral groups into big cities, while those with junior colleges, technical secondary schools and those without academic qualifications stay in small cities, counties, villages and towns. And this also means that the superiority of teachers' academic qualifications has also been impacted - for example, in urban schools, teachers hold parent-teacher conferences, and the parents may be mainly masters and doctors, but the teachers on the stage are undergraduates. This means that the superiority of urban teachers in terms of academic qualifications no longer exists.

Of course, even in small cities and counties, there are many parents of private undergraduates and college students. And many teachers in small cities and counties have about the same degree as a bachelor's degree. Compared with the parents of college students (or private undergraduates), the teachers of undergraduate students have some academic superiority, but it can also be ignored.

In the context of the popularization of academic qualifications, what do teachers rely on to maintain their sense of superiority?

So the superiority of contemporary teachers is in a state of crisis: after all, one of my fans said that when there is a parent-teacher conference, too many parents have higher education than teachers or even less than teachers.

2. Grief

In fact, there is a common misorientation among contemporary teachers in East Asia, that is, they think they are superior.

In Europe and the United States, teachers are actually waiters who receive money to provide services or teaching workers who provide teaching labor. Students and parents are the ones who purchase the services. Both sides are equal. But in East Asia, many teachers have the illusion of being superior to others and above society. For example, for the news of corrupt officials being arrested, ordinary people can applaud. When the news of male teachers QJ female students, or female teachers blackmailing parents, is exposed, it will be interpreted by some teachers and teachers' lackeys as smearing teachers, and even believe that there are conspiracy theories, and intimidate relevant journalists, believing that they are spies for the United States and Japan.

The lackeys of teachers are actually poor worms who are PUA by teachers. The hardships they have encountered in their lives are worthy of their recognition. Their wealth will be cheated away by the PUA methods of some unscrupulous teachers, and then, their children will almost face the tragedy of men becoming thieves and female babies falling into the dust.

Read on