The first shock came from ASML, the world's largest manufacturer of lithography machines. The company's net profit plummeted by 37.4 percent in the first quarter, almost 4 percent! What is this concept? Their profits just evaporated, and the reason behind this was unexpected by the West.
In today's ever-changing technology, Huawei's three blockbuster news shook the whole world like spring thunder. When we turn our attention from the reaction of the West to the domestic, it is not difficult to find that behind these three pieces of news is the rise of mainland technology enterprises in adversity, and it is also the embodiment of people's livelihood demands.
First, let's take a look at the news that ASML's net profit plummeted by 37.4%. This number is a heavy blow to any business. However, behind this lies the tenacious vitality of mainland technology companies in the global competition. When Western companies tried to suppress mainland companies in the field of low-end chips by restricting the export of high-end lithography machines, Huawei caught them off guard with Mate60 and Kirin 9000s chips. This not only broke the technological blockade of the West, but also a counterattack by mainland technology companies in global competition.
However, we cannot ignore that this battle of lithography machines is not only a competition between enterprises, but also a manifestation of people's livelihood demands. In the current international environment, the development of mainland science and technology enterprises is not only a matter of the enterprise itself, but also a major event related to the development of the country and the well-being of people's livelihood. Therefore, while we are cheering for Huawei's counterattack, we must also see that behind this war is the difficult progress of mainland technology companies in global competition.
Secondly, we must see that Huawei's counterattack is not accidental. Behind this is the continuous investment in scientific and technological innovation by mainland science and technology enterprises, the importance of talents, and the keen grasp of market demand. These are the key factors for mainland technology companies to be invincible in the global competition. However, we must also see that behind this counterattack is the difficult progress of mainland technology companies in the global competition. In the face of the technological blockade of the West, we must not only see Huawei's counterattack, but also see the difficult progress of mainland technology companies in global competition.
While cheering for Huawei's counterattack, we must also see that behind this war is the difficult progress of mainland technology companies in global competition. In the face of the technological blockade of the West, we must not only see Huawei's counterattack, but also see the difficult progress of mainland technology companies in global competition. This requires us to continue to increase investment in scientific and technological innovation, increase the cultivation of talents, and increase the grasp of market demand. Only in this way can we remain invincible in the global competition.
Finally, I would like to say that Huawei's counterattack is not only a powerful response to the Western technology blockade, but also an incentive for mainland technology companies. It tells us that as long as we insist on scientific and technological innovation, insist on talent priority, and adhere to market demand, we will be able to be invincible in global competition. At the same time, we must also see that behind this counterattack is the difficult progress of mainland technology enterprises in global competition. This requires us to continue to increase investment in scientific and technological innovation, increase the cultivation of talents, and increase the grasp of market demand. Only in this way can we remain invincible in the global competition.
In general, Huawei's three blockbuster news is not only a powerful response to the Western technology blockade, but also an incentive for mainland technology companies. It tells us that as long as we insist on scientific and technological innovation, insist on talent priority, and adhere to market demand, we will be able to be invincible in global competition. At the same time, we must also see that behind this counterattack is the difficult progress of mainland technology enterprises in global competition. This requires us to continue to increase investment in scientific and technological innovation, increase the cultivation of talents, and increase the grasp of market demand. Only in this way can we remain invincible in the global competition.
Therefore, I suggest that the mainland government should increase its support for science and technology enterprises, especially in the areas of scientific and technological innovation, personnel training, and market demand. At the same time, we should also encourage enterprises to increase R&D investment and improve their independent innovation capabilities to meet the challenges of global competition. Only in this way can we remain invincible in the global competition and achieve the sustainable development of mainland science and technology enterprises.