Editor/Nine Sisters
This May Day, Mr. Fang from Taizhou, Zhejiang, ushered in a big day, and he and his beloved are about to enter the palace of marriage.
It was originally a happy and happy thing, but because of the unreasonable request of the wedding rental company, it made me upset and affected my mood.
What happened
Loading...
Mr. Fang from Taizhou, Zhejiang, the wedding was scheduled for this May Day, and he booked a wedding car in advance at a rental company.
Wait for Mr. Fang to pay the deposit.
The leasing company sent him a long message.
Mr. Fang felt that it was wrong, and there were many items attached to this message:
Other rental companies have three packs of cigarettes, but this rental company asks for six packs.
One driver for one car, cigarettes are twice as expensive.
In addition, the rental company also requires that a driver be arranged to eat at the table for a meal in the evening.
Mr. Fang's wedding banquet in the restaurant is 4,780 yuan per table.
He calculated that if the driver served the table to eat, the average driver would spend 500 yuan more.
In other words, Mr. Fang's rental wedding car should be ten, and in total, it will cost almost 5,000 yuan, and one more table of banquets will come out, so much money, he will definitely not agree with the driver to eat at the table.
The price has been negotiated and the deposit has been paid, why should the leasing company add these more items?
It turned out that before Mr. Fang paid the deposit,
The head of the rental company said that the driver worked from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., and the nine hours of work was too long and had already exceeded the meal.
The person in charge negotiated with Mr. Fang whether he could have a simple meal in the small restaurant next to him, or give 50 yuan to each driver to solve the problem of eating by himself.
But Mr. Fang disagreed, he said that the driver could wait outside the hotel entrance, and after the guests finished eating, the driver would go in to eat.
When the leasing company heard Mr. Fang's words, it was very angry and said: Mr. Fang asked our driver to eat the leftover meals of the guests, which was insulting.
The requirements of the leasing company were not negotiated,
In the end, Mr. Fang still paid the price according to the previous project.
But after paying the deposit, the leasing company repented.
Sending a message, the cigarettes need to be doubled, originally a driver three packs of cigarettes, thirty packs of cigarettes are enough, now sixty packs of cigarettes are enough.
The extra money for thirty packs of cigarettes is at least a thousand yuan.
asked the driver to go to the table for dinner, and Mr. Fang invisibly had about 6,000 yuan more, and he would definitely not agree.
Mr. Fang said earlier that it was insulting to let the driver eat the leftover meals of the guests?
Everyone's understanding of this problem is different, and some people think that eating other people's leftover meals is a bad feeling.
But Mr. Fang doesn't think so, he thinks that the guests eat less, so many dishes can't be eaten, and it is a waste to pour, and there is no insult for the driver to eat.
Netizens' views on this matter.
Those who support Mr. Fang say that they should not take care of the food, and that the company should be responsible for the lives of its employees.
Netizens said that the per capita cost of a good banquet is not low now, and they only rent a car and don't say that they have food, so they can't be morally kidnapped.
Some netizens said that the leasing company should be responsible for the lives of its own employees, and the host family is happy that you can eat as much as you want, and you can't let you go to the table if you are not happy.
In addition, there are also people who support leasing companies and feel that the main family is too small.
Netizens said that as long as you are thick-skinned or stingy, you don't need to worry about the meal, but it is too much to let people eat leftovers, and it is insulting to let people eat leftovers.
Some netizens said that as for multiple people adding more chopsticks, ten people at a table, eleven people can't sit down?
Some netizens said that everyone who came on the big day was a guest, and there was no shortage of a table of food, so there was no need for people to scold themselves in their hearts.
Everyone's perspective is different, and their views on this matter are different, and there is no one right or wrong in this matter.
But this matter is different, it is negotiated in advance, and the driver's living expenses are not provided, and there are so many items after paying the deposit, and the rental company is not right.
epilogue
Should the driver of the rental company eat at the table?
This question comes up a lot and is often discussed.
Let's take a look at what a person who has ever had a wedding thinks about it.
Netizens said that he used to do weddings, and he ordered takeout by himself, the workers ate together, and the boss reimbursed him.
In Mr. Fang's case, the leasing company was at fault first.
First of all, the person in charge of the rental company discussed with Mr. Fang the issue of the wedding car driver's meal.
Mr. Fang did not agree to provide living expenses and did not agree to serve the table, but he could wait for the guests to eat before serving.
If the leasing company does not agree, it can not sign the contract and not do the business.
Why don't you agree to sign a contract, wait for Mr. Fang to pay the deposit, and then impose the project, and say that Mr. Fang said that the matter of eating leftovers is insulting.
The leasing company just wants to make this money, and wants to kidnap Mr. Fang morally.
Returning to the rental company, the question of whether the driver should go to the table for dinner.
This question can be decided according to the different customs and habits of each place and the different economic conditions of each family, and there is no hard requirement.
In today's society, it's not easy to make money, and a table of wine is not cheap.
If the rental company signs a contract with the owner, the owner does not bear the cost of providing the driver's living expenses, and the owner cannot be morally kidnapped for being stingy afterwards.
What do you think about this issue?
(Material source: Xiaoqiang hotline)