Before reading the article, please click "Follow" to facilitate discussion and sharing. Authors will live up to expectations and create better content on time and in quantity.
Wen I dreamed of the night nine songs
Edited I Night
At this moment, let go of the things you don't want to care about when you're unhappy, and enjoy your happy time
A South Korean netizen had a brainstorm, and he asked a question on Quora, the largest Q&A website abroad: "Is there any way to kick China out of the UN Security Council and let South Korea replace it?"
You South Korea not only plagiarized China's traditional culture and food culture, but now you want to plagiarize the position of our United Nations, which really confirms the saying - South Korea does not create myths, if you want it, then take it, after all, the whole universe was created by you South Korea.
South Korea is really an amazing country, they are very fond of plagiarizing other people's culture, a long time ago, South Korea unilaterally claimed that Chinese characters were invented by them, and also listed a lot of history as evidence, saying that they would also take Chinese characters to the World Heritage List.
However, after verification, it was found that these so-called histories are not tenable at all, everything is made up by Korean netizens, and now there are people who have begun to covet China's position in the United Nations, which I can only say is simply whimsical.
Therefore, in the face of the problems of South Korean netizens, many people began to ridicule below, one of which was Singaporean netizens said that South Korea is simply not capable of sitting in the position of the Joint Security Council, and their economic strength is less than one-tenth of China's.
Moreover, they do not have sufficient manufacturing and production capacity, and whether or not they can become the five permanent members of the Security Council is entirely based on strength, does South Korea have strength? I don't think so, they still need the protection of the United States, so let alone the so-called military strength.
China, on the other hand, is not only economically developed, but also second only to the United States in military strength, and they made great contributions in World War II, which shows that China is more qualified than South Korea to sit in that position.
Why did China get the position of permanent member, they succeeded in driving the Japanese invaders out of China in World War II, severely damaged Japan's armed forces in the Asian theater, and secondly, after the founding of the country, China fought against the United States, which was the number one in the world at that time.
In the Korean War, the United States gathered the forces of 16 countries to form the United Nations Army, which is arguably the most luxurious camp, they have planes and aircraft carriers to cover, while China, on the other hand, they have nothing.
But even then China still won, and that's why China has become a P5, remember, all seats on the Security Council are won through war.
Then a netizen from the UK commented that South Korea is not qualified to replace it, and the question you asked made me think that you were stupid, do you know why? First of all, you are not a victorious country in World War II, and South Korea did not participate in any battle in World War II.
At that time, Korea was still a Japanese colony, and it was not until the end of World War II that Korea regained its freedom, and you did not risk your lives to fight the Japanese militarist butchers, and China did such a thing.
China fought against the Japanese invaders for 14 years, during which China sacrificed a total of 35 million soldiers and civilians in exchange for the final victory and the salvation of the world from destruction.
Immediately afterwards, French netizens said that why replace the position of China's permanent member, China has made a lot of contributions in the world, first of all, China loves peace and opposes war, and they are the country that has sent the largest number of peacekeeping troops.
The main responsibility of these maintenance forces is to protect refugees from harm, and whenever a country is devastated by war, China is also the first to send relief supplies, contrary to the United States, China has always been very respectful of the sovereignty of other countries.
No matter whether the country is strong or weak, it always treats everyone equally in the eyes of China, and if South Korea wants to replace China, can you guarantee that you are doing as well as China, I don't think you are necessarily doing as well as China.
Instead of trying to replace China in the United Nations, why don't you dare to replace the permanent seat of the United States, which has been waging wars all over the world in recent years, should he be replaced, or because of the US military stationed in South Korea, you dare not say so.
Then another netizen from Sydney said, we all know that China loves peace, and they have indeed done it, China has not dropped a single bomb on foreign territory, not a single one, so compared to the United States, I prefer China.
China has always been committed to maintaining world peace, they hope that there will be no more wars between countries, compared to the United States, China is more like a gentleman, and the United States is simply a war maniac, such a country will one day be rejected by everyone.
Now it seems that South Korea not only has a small population, but even a very small pattern, and uses the eyes of a frog at the bottom of the well to talk about things that do not belong to them.
If you want to kick China out of the Security Council, South Korea is somewhat whimsical, and when South Korea can learn to protect itself, let's talk to our country about its international status!
International relations are not simply the law of the jungle, but require consultation and game on the basis of fairness, justice and law.
In the face of a complex international environment, countries should solve problems through dialogue and cooperation, rather than trying to realize their own interests through unilateral power.