For a long time, many parts of the country have imposed various restrictions on electric vehicles. From speed limits to wearing helmets, from overweight to overweight, from restrictions to total bans, it seems that there is an iron determination to eliminate electric vehicles from people's lives. In fact, ordinary people are not stupid, electric vehicles are not only low cost, but also very convenient and fast, which can greatly save time and economic costs. If I have to say that it is a reason for safety, this reason is not tenable at all, so don't be busy arguing, I will talk about the specific reasons below. The reason why all parts of the country are shouting and shouting and killing electric vehicles, we do not rule out that there are capital forces behind it, that is, the problem of shared bicycles and shared electric vehicles, mainly the problem of data security, we will talk about it in detail below.
1. Are electric vehicles really unsafe?
It seems that this is not the case, the number of deaths in traffic accidents that occur every year in the country is much lower than that of cars, but why are cars not banned? People on the earth know that cars are convenient for life, and electric vehicles are actually more convenient for life, which is also an important reason why many foreigners have a soft spot for electric vehicles made in China. From the safety point of view, electric vehicles in the production, manufacturing, transportation and sales have been inspected layer by layer, there can be no huge safety hazards, if there are really huge safety hazards, then these electric vehicles have long been not allowed to produce. But once it is in the hands of the masses, why does it become unsafe? Some people say that it is because the quality of the people riding electric vehicles is too poor and they do not abide by the efficiency rules, so the potential safety hazards are great. For this, I do not deny that there are some delivery people and couriers who do not follow the traffic rules due to time reasons.
But we should see that most of the electric car owners are more honest, and they are able to abide by traffic rules, after all, they are at the bottom of the society, their own life is not easy, most of the people who go out to work are the pillars of the family, these people have a family behind them to maintain, they pay more attention to their own safety. And some parents who send their children to and from school also pay more attention to their own and their children's personal safety, so this reason is a false proposition. Furthermore, if traffic rules are violated, they can be punished by relevant laws and regulations, and can be governed by strengthening traffic penalties, but the electric vehicle itself should not bear this pot, which is obviously unreasonable. Recently, some forces have begun to hype the hidden dangers of electric vehicle charging, causing the central media to pay attention to this matter. In fact, we can also find in our lives that there are many cases of spontaneous combustion of new energy vehicles or spontaneous combustion of electric vehicles, which is clear at a glance. Therefore, banning electric vehicles on safety grounds is definitely a false proposition.
2. Why ban electric vehicles?
In fact, there are two groups that stand to benefit from banning electric vehicles, one is the car manufacturer, and the other is the bike-sharing provider. In the past, it was very convenient to ride an electric car on a road of several kilometers or even more than ten kilometers, and you could get there immediately, but once electric vehicles were banned, the people had only two choices: either to buy a car or to share a bicycle. And for the latter, it is obviously more convenient and efficient. I don't know if you have seen the news, recently electric vehicles in a certain place have just been restricted, and shared bicycles and shared electric vehicles will be settled immediately. As we all know, there is not much difference between the two, and the most fundamental difference is that one is one's own and does not need to spend any money, and the other is a capitalist, and each time it is used, it has to pay a fee. I remember that last year the state also forced 3C safety helmets, and because of this, many people had to spend money to buy some helmets, and some of the poorer quality helmets would even be confiscated and fined.
But everyone found that no, each shared electric car is also equipped with a helmet, and the strange thing is that these helmets are very simple, but they can be recognized by law enforcement officers. Isn't this surprising? The simple helmets that the people buy themselves are not qualified, but the simple helmets equipped with shared bicycles are. On the other hand, in recent years, the cost of sharing bicycles has risen all the way, and in the past, various discounts for riding a few kilometers of road only cost 2 yuan. In fact, it is because electric vehicles have been subject to various restrictions, taxis need to wait for a long time, and buses are extremely inconvenient, so the masses can only choose to share bicycles for the convenience of travel.
3. What are the hazards of bike sharing?
In fact, the harm of shared bicycles is not small, the first is traffic safety. You must know that the performance of every vehicle is different, for example, cars, we are used to driving a car, and suddenly we feel very uncomfortable changing to a car. In fact, some shared bicycles are unstable in the center of gravity, difficult to control, and prone to fall injuries or traffic accidents. The second is health and safety. The so-called sharing means that everyone can use it, and this is where the problem arises. There are a lot of people who use shared bicycles every day, so various diseases and infectious diseases will also make shared bicycles a carrier, such as grips, such as seat cushions, and helmets, which will become an important channel for disease transmission.
In fact, the most critical hazard is data security, we know that once a person uses a shared bicycle, where is your home, where do you often go, your driving route, your payment methods and habits, etc., will be collected by the shared bicycle APP. If you use the current big data system for analysis, you don't even have a little bit of privacy. Do you remember that Didi's listing was halted a few years ago, but in fact, the main problem is data security. In fact, everyone knows that cars are relative to the middle-income group, and now cars not only have a navigation system for precise positioning, but some cars such as Tesla have a clear grasp of your information, so there is no privacy anymore. The shared bicycle is facing the general public, and it also better makes up for the lack of data. With the sharing of bicycles, it can be said that all the information of the people of the whole country except for children and the elderly will be mastered by these apps.
After mastering this information, the next role is more, you can use big data to accurately push advertisements, and you can understand the situation from specific people, such as the problem of big data killing, such as the problem of personal behavior habits for some people to formulate some strategic references. Of course, if good aspects are used, such as grasping people's livelihood and suffering, grasping people's basic living standards, and providing a basis for the formulation of national policies, this is of course good, but I am afraid that once these data and personal privacy are used in some improper places, the harm is considerable. What's even more terrifying is that if these data are in the hands of some hostile forces, I think everyone should know very well what the consequences will be.
I remember a sentence that said: the future world is the world of big data, and if you master big data, you will master the future, and for some capitalists, if you master big data, you will have endless pigs and leeks that you can't cut. Of course, I hope that this idea of mine may only be my personal opinion and does not represent the actual situation, but this concern is still necessary, and this possibility exists. Because of this, I used to be very puzzled by the ban or restriction of people's favorite means of transportation, let alone understand that some media and experts are talking in the name of "safety", but now it seems that I understand. Maybe it's not for safety, it's just for profit.