The term "plum blowing" refers specifically to those groups who greatly admire Messi and often belittle Ronaldo. Whenever the headlines are filled with such extreme remarks, readers will always feel strong disgust and physical discomfort, and even vomit. This strong emotional response is not only a direct feedback on the content of the speech, but also a reflection of the collision of deep social psychology, cultural identity and personal values.
1. Intensification of competition and antagonism
In the world of football, Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo are often seen as a pair of immortal rivals, each with a huge fan base. When the "Mei Blow" remarks not only praise Messi, but also involve the disparagement of Ronaldo, it actually draws a clear line between the two camps. This approach not only exacerbates the sense of competition and antagonism between fans on both sides, but also touches fans who appreciate fair play and respect the values of their opponents. The feeling of vomiting may be the instinctive rejection of this unhealthy competitive culture.
2. Pollution of the information environment and emotional overload
In the era of information explosion, social media has become a channel for the rapid dissemination of opinions, but at the same time, it is also easy to breed extreme and one-sided speech. "Mei Blow" knelt down and licked Messi and attacked Ronaldo's remarks, which brought pollution to the information environment under frequent exposure, and made users who pursued balanced and objective information feel tired and dissatisfied. The rebellious psychology caused by emotional overload causes these users to develop a defensive aversion response in the face of such information, both physically and psychologically.
3. The conflict between individual identity and group belonging
Everyone has their own idolatry, and this worship is often closely tied to personal identity. When an individual's sense of identity is challenged when they see their favorite star being treated unfairly, especially by belittling others, it can lead to anger or disgust. For those viewers who appreciate Messi and Ronaldo at the same time, or have a higher pursuit of sportsmanship, this extreme "plum blowing" behavior destroys their respect for sportsmanship, hurts their pure love for football, and thus produces strong negative emotions.
4. Group polarization and labeling
From a socio-psychological point of view, the phenomenon of group polarization explains why the rhetoric tends to go to extremes. In a particular online community, like-minded people gather to reinforce each other's views, which ultimately leads to more extreme positions. At the same time, labeling (e.g., "Umebuki") simplifies complex interpersonal differences, reinforces the boundaries between inner and outer groups, and further stimulates intergroup hostility. For outside observers, this black-and-white mode of speech not only lacks depth and objectivity, but also struggles to resonate, triggering physical discomfort.
epilogue
In short, in the face of the phenomenon of "plum blowing" and the strong emotional response it evokes, we need to realize that this is not only a simple disagreement in the discussion of sports competition, but also a product of the intertwined influence of information dissemination, group psychology and social culture in the Internet age. It is our common responsibility to advocate rational discussion, respect for diverse voices, and maintain a healthy online communication environment, and it is also an effective way to alleviate such negative emotions and promote social harmony.