laitimes

The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right

author:Obayer

On Tuesday, the review team of the referee committee of the Chinese Football Association announced the results of the fifth phase of the referee review work, Ma Ning's penalty in the 8th round was determined to be a wrong decision, and Fu Ming's penalty in the Shanghai derby was invalid.

The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right

In the 86th minute of Guoan's match against Zhejiang, Yang Liyu fell to the ground after scrambling in the penalty area, and the referee did not award a penalty. Subsequently, Ma Ning, who served as the video assistant referee, intervened to award the penalty, and the referee reviewed the slow motion and awarded a penalty. After the game, Guoan was dissatisfied with the decision and appealed.

The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right
The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right

The review team finally determined that Ma Ning and the referee's decision was wrong, "Zhejiang team No. 45 player fouled first during the scramble, and the subsequent action of Beijing Guoan team player No. 17 should not be regarded as a foul, and the referee's decision to change the penalty was wrong; ”

In the 5th minute of stoppage time, Wang Haijian scored from a distance, but after looking back at the slow motion, Fu Ming thought that Yu Hanchao was in an offside position, interfering with the goalkeeper, and finally ruled that the goal was invalid.

The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right
The referee wrongly judged that Ma Ning should not intervene, and Fu Ming was right

The review team held that "the No. 20 player of Shanghai Shenhua team was in an offside position when his teammate shot and touched the ball, and the action of dodging the ball was an obvious move that affected the opponent's goalkeeper's ability to handle the ball, which constituted an offside foul that interfered with the opposing team, and the offside decision of the first assistant referee was correct; the referee's decision to invalidate the goal and uphold the penalty after reviewing was correct; and VAR intervention was wrong." ”

Read on