Before reading this article, in order to facilitate your discussion and sharing, please click "Follow", which can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Text: Mo Hanxue
Edited by Mo Hanxue
[Preface]
"Is it tolerable or intolerable!" The United States issued three successive letters of challenge in a short period of 48 hours, and this act is undoubtedly challenging the mainland's bottom line.
Blinken has just returned from a visit to China, and he can't wait to "take chicken feathers as a sword" and point fingers at the mainland, which is really taking himself too seriously!
In the face of what the United States has done, our country has not been accustomed to it at all, and it has directly sounded the "bell" in the People's Daily......
What are the three war letters issued by the United States, and how did the mainland respond forcefully to this?
[There is no red carpet for Blinken's visit to China]
Taiwan issue, South China Sea issue, Ren'ai Jiao, the Philippines, China-Russia relations...... In recent years, almost all of the mainland's big and small situations and problems have been inextricably linked with the United States, and they have always been constantly demanding and imposing sanctions on the mainland, as if only in this way can they demonstrate their hegemonic status.
However, the United States seems to have forgotten that the world pattern has undergone tremendous changes now, and our China is no longer the China of more than 70 years ago, so their "finger-pointing" cannot change anything.
During Blinken's visit to China some time ago, the mainland's attitude has actually been very good proof, but it is a pity that the United States still seems to be unable to understand it.
As the secretary of state of the United States, Blinken's position is not low, so it stands to reason that when he visits China, the treatment he receives is not low, but the mainland has not prepared any red carpet for him during his two visits to China within a year.
Most importantly, when Blinken landed at the airport for his visit to China, only Kong Fuan, director of the Shanghai Foreign Affairs Office, and US Ambassador to China Burns were greeted by other heavyweight officials.
This kind of reception is relatively cold compared with traditional diplomatic etiquette, but this cannot be blamed on China, but only on what the United States has done in the past two years, which really hurts the hearts of our Chinese.
Either they are imposing sanctions or on the road to sanctions, or they are inciting Taiwan to oppose us, or they are instigating the Philippines to make trouble at Ren'ai Jiao......
No matter what it is, we don't want to greet the United States with a smile, so as soon as Blinken's plane landed, we arranged for him to go directly to the hotel where he was staying.
And the name of the hotel where Blinken stayed this time is also very interesting, called "Peace Hotel", which literally means that we in China can already understand what we are hinting at.
In fact, the principle that China has always adhered to is "peaceful coexistence", after all, in the original war years, both our country and our people paid too much, so war is the last thing we want to see and experience.
But obviously, Blinken, who visited China this time, did not take what we hoped for in mind, so as soon as he returned to China, the United States began to be restless again, and directly issued three "war letters......
[The United States has 3 challenges in a row]
Some time ago, the U.S. election has been in an uproar, and the contest between Biden and Trump is also dazzling.
After all, we just need to wait for the results of other countries' presidential elections, but the first thing Blinken did when he returned home was to claim that there was "evidence" that China was trying to "influence and interfere" in the U.S. election.
He noted that the United States has found evidence that China is trying to "influence and potentially interfere" in the upcoming U.S. elections and said it wants to ensure that such behavior is cut off as soon as possible.
Blinken's behavior is undoubtedly opening his eyes and telling nonsense, and they are trying to smear China with such trumped-up charges, and at the same time, they are also giving us a challenge in disguise to test the mainland's bottom line and reaction.
In response to Blinken's remarks, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a regular press conference that non-interference in China's internal affairs is one of the basic principles of China's diplomacy, and the US should not be suspicious and chase after the wind.
Lin Jian also stressed that the US election is an internal affair of the United States, and China has never been interested in and will not interfere in any way.
Our country's response was frank and unrestrained, leaving no mercy on the United States, and at the same time making the United States understand that blindly smearing others will not end well in the end.
In addition to this incident, Blinken also threatened us with China and demanded that we "break up" with Russia.
There is evidence that Blinken and his aides are trying to unite the G7 countries to force China and Russia to "draw a line" and strongly demand that China stop supporting Russia.
During his visit, Blinken also conveyed to China the strong dissatisfaction of the United States and its allies, especially about China's continued supply of key technologies and products to Russia.
In fact, Blinken's demands on the mainland are all superfluous, which in itself is a matter for our country, and their behavior is to meddle in the internal affairs of other countries.
On the matter of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the United States has been jumping back and forth in it, and they have not mentioned anything about helping Ukraine, but now they are pointing fingers at the matter of Sino-Russian friendship and cooperation.
What the United States has done is really an incomparably "double standard", and they have also used this incident to once again issue a "challenge letter" to China.
There is also a "challenge book", which is actually a bit cliché, because this matter has been going on for a long time, but the United States is still clinging to it.
Perhaps the United States clearly knows that in the field of chips, China cannot completely break away from foreign technology for the time being, so Blinken once again mentioned the United States' "chip ban" on China in an interview.
The U.S. "chip ban" on China is a series of export control measures taken by the U.S. government to restrict China's access to advanced technology and equipment, especially in the field of artificial intelligence chips and semiconductor manufacturing.
These measures include, but are not limited to, banning the export of certain AI chips to China, restricting U.S. companies from selling chips to China, and banning the use of U.S. money and expertise to help China develop its own products.
On October 17, 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security issued a new export ban on chips, which is a further upgrade of the previous export control rules.
These new regulations cover not only products from companies like Nvidia, but also technologies and equipment from companies such as Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA.
In addition to this, the United States has also placed special emphasis on export control measures against China's advanced computing chip and semiconductor industries.
And this time, it seems that the United States is going to increase its efforts again, and according to informed sources, the United States not only does not sell it to us this time, but does not even want to repair it for us.
This series of measures by the United States, in fact, to put it bluntly, is to prevent the mainland from acquiring advanced semiconductor technology, because these technologies may promote breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, especially in military use.
This series of operations after Blinken's visit to China is really chilling, so the mainland is not prepared to put up with their nonsense on the sidelines, there is an old saying: "Shoot when you should shoot!"
[People's Daily rings the bell]
Recently, the People's Daily published an article in the "Bells" column entitled "China and the United States Should Be Partners, Not Rivals," which emphasized the importance of cooperation between China and the United States, and proposed that the two sides should learn lessons from the development of relations over the past 45 years.
The article also mentions the principles that the mainland has always adhered to: mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation!
The article published by the mainland is undoubtedly in response to the three "challenge letters" issued by the United States one after another, and at the same time, it is also a wake-up call to the US side, telling them not to keep smearing the mainland and not to keep thinking about sanctioning the mainland.
In fact, this article is already very meaningful when it was published in the "Bells" column, because "Bells" is an international commentary under the pen name of "People's Daily", and it is the abbreviation of "Voice of China".
In addition, the article also pointed out that the stable development of China-US relations is the common expectation of the international community, and the two sides should adhere to the three principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation, and promote China-US relations to return to the track of sound and stable development.
In fact, such rhetoric already indicates that Chinese officials hope to send a positive message through this article, that China and the United States should seek cooperation rather than confrontation in order to deal with the current complex and volatile international situation.
【Conclusion】
With regard to the United States, we have always adhered to the principle of "peaceful coexistence," but the United States does not see it that way, and they have always regarded us as an "imaginary enemy......
The bell ringing in our People's Daily is a hint at the seriousness of the situation, and at the same time, it is also a warning to the United States not to insist on sanctions and isolation, which is not beneficial to the development of the two countries!
Resources:
People's Daily reported on April 28, 2024 that China and the United States should be partners, not rivals (bells).
Caixin reported on April 27, 2024, "Foreign Ministry on Blinken's Visit to China: Whether China and the United States Should Be Partners or Adversaries Is the Root of China-US Relations".
#头条创作挑战赛#