laitimes

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

author:Jingshi Xiao Rain Pack

Sentence | Jingshi Xiao Rain Pack

Edit | Meditate on the light rain lotus

Hello Toutiao friends

Don't miss the wonderful topic when you pass by~ I wish you all the best and all the best~

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

Today's topic:

Is it that the civil science will call the three-body problem a masterpiece?

For the three-body animation, it can only be said that this is an alienated three-body problem.

One thing to say, indeed

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?
The original Three-Body Problem is no problem, my Three-Body Problem is no problem, I can't watch the Three-Body Problem for five minutes, and I can't watch the TV series Three-Body Problem for five minutes, and I can't watch it even after watching one episode of the TV series [Black Face]

By mention, he is the old man of Interstellar's scientific advisor and a producer. He is also the initiator of the Gravitational Wave Observation Project

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

Kisso is he trying to say, "If your novel is adapted into a movie, I can be a scientific advisor?"

[So that there won't be some people looking for fault frame by frame [Think]]

I have read Mr. Suo's popular science books, they are very well written, and I can see that he is a particularly pure scientist. There is also a little story in the prologue of his "Black Hole and Time Bending", which is quite good.

After Da Liu and Kip Thorne finished chatting, maybe they had the inspiration to write a new work again.

Is it possible that he is domestic [witty]

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

Using the first two to look at the three-body problem, it is naturally full of loopholes and almost no useful reference value;

However, as a novel, the focus of the three-body problem should be on literary value, and this can at least rank in the world.

Under many topics of the three-body problem, the three-body problem has become a book that can see the whole picture of human civilization, and it is a book that combines a variety of theories, and it is the fifth masterpiece [laughing and crying] Okay, to be serious, I personally think it is a great science fiction novel, and some three-body people have developed some kind of religious feelings

Someone asked: How high is Da Liu's attainments in physics

There is an answer: It is about the same as Mr. Jin Yong's martial arts [laughing and crying]

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?
Almost as a part, after reading "Three-Body Problem 3" during my undergraduate physics at NTU, I began to feel ashamed that I didn't take this path

By the way, it's not just the civil sciences that call the Three-Body Problem a masterpiece, it is said that Obama also sees the Three-Body Problem and uses his presidential status to take a shortcut to find Liu Cixin to see if it is not published.

If Da Liu is really an American, then it is really big, Chinese science fiction is going to sink completely, an American can write such a novel with Chinese thoughts, you say horror is not horror [think]

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

That Da Liu will have an ending with Kubrick

In 2185 or the village teacher was born and died peacefully, there was no need to wait for 1999

Da Liu: It's an electrician, not an electrician [angry]

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

But if this kind of work appears in the United States, I'm sorry, I think it does need to be reflected, but it is impossible in the current United States

It is estimated that the fans of the Three-Body Problem of the National Nano Center and the Collision Center have been looking forward to it for more than ten years, after all, there is a high probability that they will come to them to make a three-body film and television drama.

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

The face of the three-body problem is beyond the imagination of most people.

To be honest, I was an art student, and I didn't study physics and chemistry in high school. But the Three-Body Problem makes me look up to science and revere scientists.

It shows that the nano center and the collision center do not need to be kept secret at all, and it was said before that the reason for keeping it secret is because I don't want to talk to unrelated people, and the shooting can be carried out under supervision, and it is acceptable that the three-body problem will be troublesome

Actually, no, after all, Zhizi's quantum entanglement theoretically cannot transmit information normally, and the information transmitted by the quantum entanglement principle is a bunch of garbled code.

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?
If the Three-Body Problem is defined as science fiction that is only sought after by civil science, then what about the interstellar crossings of those black holes that travel at will

But I don't think it's a masterpiece if I don't watch science fiction, his pattern has never appeared in this world, and the previous science fiction works are just playing in the well

The curvature engine in the three-body problem is infinitely close to the speed of light

It can be interpreted as "quantum entanglement" in three-dimensional space, which may actually be connected and communicative in high-dimensional space.

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

Zhizi is actually a bug, so the third part will deal with Zhizi.

No way, if there is no synchronous communication like Zhizi, then civilization will never be able to escape the blow of the dark forest,

Suppose that the speed of light can detect the impact particle by light, and the light observes that the strike particle immediately flies back to the warning site, and it will arrive at the same time as the light-speed particle.

In order to avoid blows, civilization discovered this law for the first time to create a dead light belt and fence itself to avoid blows, so that there would be no stories in the universe.

Strictly speaking, faster-than-light exists. Theoretically, tachyons can exceed the speed of light without violating the theory of relativity.

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

I've bought and read this book, but there are too many formulas in it to read.

If there is no explanation, in many places, I don't know how to push this step to the next step [cover my face]

And popular science is not easy to do, everyone's understanding is different, some people say that the formula is too many and too complicated, some people say that it is not rigorous, and each has its own statement.
Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?
At that time, looking at a bunch of formulas and charts, he wondered if he hadn't heard Stephen Hawking's summary: one more formula, sales will be halved

But then again, the end of science is theology!

Why is only Minke unilaterally calling "The Three-Body Problem" a masterpiece?

So, friends of Toutiao, what do you think?